well being中文翻譯的八卦，YOUTUBE和Yahoo名人娛樂都在討論

Cheers! Our movie ‘Babi’ has been shortlisted by the Around International Film Festival and Thai Film Festival! Kop kun krap!🙏🙏🙏

To be frank, I have completed 2 films last year, one was ‘Nasi Lemak 1.0’ which was filmed above board and another film was ‘BABI’ which was filmed secretly. We never talked openly about this project because it is a banned film (Well, it’s pretty obvious even from the film title…) and we don’t want to get into unnecessary attention…

Due to the COVID-19 pandemic, the release date of ‘Nasi Lemak 1.0’ has been delayed indefinitely and it has caused quite a big deal to us… While we were amidst of the dark clouds, we found our silver linings! ‘BABI’ was selected in 2 internationally famed film festivals, the ARFF Berlin (Around International Film Festival Berlin) and the International Thai Film Festival! We were really really happy about it!

‘BABI’ is a film based on a real-life event, the movie sheds light on a massive school racial riot which took place in year 2000 in a small town somewhere Southern in Malaysia. During that time Malaysia was still under the authoritarian rule of one-dominant party, abuse of power and corruption were frequent, media and news were being stringently controlled and filtered. Thus, the incident was being ‘compromised’ by relevant authority, most of Malaysians doesn’t know about this incident.

The script was actually written 7 years ago, the main reason that the film was not in production that time was because nobody would ever consider to invest on a zero-profit, must-be banned film. The second reason was I had no idea whom should I ask for help, I believed after hearing the film title, everyone would be scared off... Yet in the end, I’m still managed to finish this film with a very very very tight budget. I want to thank all the people who have contributed greatly to the movie, especially the producer Joko Toh

We decided to put the 7-year-old script in production is to tell the truth behind the story but most importantly sending a message to all Malaysians that we must be more unified disregard of our ethnicity and race. In short, we shall always lend a helping hand to each others and communicate with our hearts and souls, therefore we won’t be exploited by politicians who incite racial sentiment to reach their end goal. Otherwise, more tragic like this will happens…

The idea of be able to screen this film in Malaysia has never crossed my mind before, that’s why we never tried to register the film after the production. Rightly next, I hope that this film can be seen elsewhere other than at Thailand’s or Germany’s film festival, I wish there are better methods in exposing the film and to reach out to everyone. Currently, we are still on our lofty quest but please do cheer for us! Happy Merdeka Day in advance! Malaysia Boleh!

*Versi BM*
Tahniah! Filem kami [BABI] telah dipilih dalam Around International Film Festival dan Thai Film Festival ! Kop Kun Krap! 🙏🙏🙏

Sebenarnya pada tahun lepas kami telahpun menghasilkan dua buah filem. Yang pertama adalah filem [Nasi Lemak 1.0] yang penggambarannya dijalankan dengan berani dan terang, satu lagi adalah filem [BABI] dimana proses penggambaran dijalankan dalam keadaan yang sulit dan rahsia. Kami tidak pernah membuat apa-apa pengumuman mengenai perkara ini, kerana khuathir filem ini akan menimbulkan kontroversi (lihat sajalah nama filemnya...) Kami tidak mahu memburukkan keadaan.

Disebabkan isu pandemik Covid-19, filem [Nasi Lemak 1.0] tidak dapat ditayangkan di pawagam dan telah membawa kerugian yang teruk pada kami. Walaubagaimanapun kami menerima berita baik berkenaan pemilihan filem [BABI] dalam dua festival filem antarabangsa yang berprestij iaitu ARFF Berlin (Around International Film Festival Berlin) serta International Thai Film Festival! Kami berasa amat gembira!

Filem [BABI] adalah lakonan semula sebuah rusuhan perkauman yang berlaku di sebuah sekolah menengah yang terletak di bahagian selatan Malaysia pada tahun 2000. Pada ketika itu Malaysia masih berada di bawah kepemimpinan parti yang dominan. Pemimpin-pemimpin menyalahgunakan kuasa dan pihak media dikawal sepenuhnya oleh kerajaan. Oleh yang demikian, tragedi ini akhirnya telah 'diselesaikan' oleh pihak tertentu dan rakyat Malaysia telah 'disekat' dari peristiwa tersebut.

Skrip asal untuk filem [BABI] telah saya tulis sejak 7 tahun yang lalu. Namun antara sebab utama saya tidak dapat menghasilkan filem ini adalah kerana isu modal, kerana tiada yang sudi mengeluarkan modal untuk sebuah filem yang mungkin akan diharamkan dan tidak akan ditayangkan di pawagam. Sebab kedua adalah kerana saya tidak tahu siapa yang akan sudi menghasilkan filem ini bersama saya kerana saya pasti, hanya dengan mendengar namanya saja sudah tentu tiada yang akan ingin mengambil bahagian. Namun dengan segala daya usaha dari semua pihak yang sudi membantu dan menerusi modal yang teramat-amat rendah, kami akhirnya berjaya menghabiskan filem ini. Saya dengan ikhlas ingin berterima kasih pada semua krew, petugas, pelakon dan kakitangan belakang tabir yang terlibat dalam menjayakan filem ini, terutamanya penerbit Joko Toh

Tujuan utama kami merealisasikan skrip yang ditulis sejak 7 tahun yang lalu adalah untuk membongkar perkara sebenar seluruh peristiwa ini. Juga menerusi filem ini, kami ingin menyampaikan mesej betapa pentingnya perpaduan dan keharmonian diantara kaum supaya dielak dari dipergunakan oleh ahli politik demi untuk mencapai matlamat dan motif masing-masing. Jika tidak, kami percaya pasti pasti lebih banyak tragedi ngeri bakal berlalu...

Tak pernah terlintas dalam fikiran kami untuk menayangkan filem ini di Malaysia. Oleh yang demikian, kami tak pernah mohon dari mana-mana pihak berkenaan permohonan penayangan. Kami berharap selepas ini, filem ini bukan saja akan ditayangkan di festival filem Berlin dan Thailand, kami mahu supaya filem [BABI] dapat ditonton oleh lebih ramai penonton di seluruh dunia. Kami akan tetap berusaha, silalah berdoa dan sokong usaha kami! Selamat Hari Kemerdekaan untuk Malaysia! Malaysia Boleh!

*中文翻譯*
恭喜恭喜! 我們的電影【BABI/你是豬】入選了【ARFF環球國際電影節(柏林)】還有【泰國國際電影節】! Kop kun krap! 🙏🙏🙏

其實去年我在馬來西亞完成了兩部電影拍攝，一部是光明正大在拍的叫【辣死你媽-續集】，而另一部電影則是秘密進行的，叫【BABI/你是豬】。這件事情從頭到尾我們都沒有公開過，因為這是一部禁片（看戲名就知道了），我們不想節外生枝...

【辣死你媽-續集】因為疫情的緣故沒辦法上映，造成了嚴重的虧損... 當我們在愁雲慘霧之際，卻收到了天大的好消息! 就是【BABI/你是豬】入圍了國際上著名的兩大影展 【ARFF環球國際電影節(柏林)】和【泰國國際電影節】! 真的很開心!

【BABI/你是豬】真人真事改編自一起大型校園種族暴動事件，發生在2000年馬來西亞南方小鎮的一所學校裡。當時的馬來西亞處在一黨獨大，濫權腐敗，媒體被嚴格控管及消息封鎖的階段。因此這起事件在當時已被相關單位“和諧”，在馬來西亞幾乎沒有人知道。

其實這是我七年前寫的劇本，我沒拍出來的第一個原因，當然是因為沒有人會願意把錢丟進一部即將被禁，賺不回本的電影裡。第二個原因則是我當時不知道要找誰幫我拍，相信聽到這個戲名，大家應該都怕了吧... 但最後我還是以很低很低成本的方式，拜託了很多人幫忙，才完成了這部電影。真的要謝謝參與電影拍攝的每一個台前幕後的人，尤其監製 Joko Toh。

我們決定要把這部七年前的劇本拍出來的目的，就是要揭露整起暴動事件的真相，也要藉此電影提醒馬來西亞人，種族之間必須更團結，互助，交流，才不會一直被政治人物利用，以操弄種族情緒而達到政治目的。否則將會發生更多類似的悲劇...

我從來都沒有想過這部電影能夠在馬來西亞上映，所以我們拍完了之後從來都沒有拿去申請過。接下來，希望這部電影不止在泰國和德國的影展能看到，期待以後能夠以更光明正大的方式讓所有人都能看到。我們還在努力中，請為我們加油吧！預祝馬來西亞獨立日快樂! Malaysia Boleh!

FINAS Malaysia Kementerian Dalam Negeri (KDN) Polis Diraja Malaysia ( Royal Malaysia Police ) #LPF Lembaga Penapisan Filem

【2017烈酒大賽回顧（布魯塞爾世界酒類競賽烈酒評選）】

〖台灣在世界烈酒舞台，繼續發光發熱！〗

布魯塞爾世界酒類競賽烈酒評選（Spirits Selection by Concours Mondial de Bruxelles），是全球最富盛名的烈酒賽事之一。台灣今年在此大賽中，再次獲得佳績，所獲獎牌數量為參賽前五強。第一名是法國（本土44面，海外屬地53面），其次是中國（47面）、墨西哥（27面）、義大利（25面）與台灣（22面）。

台灣雙金獎1面（金車噶瑪蘭 Kavalan Solist Fino Sherry Single Cask Strength）、金獎11面（得獎者包括金門酒廠、信義鄉農會、台灣菸酒公司、國立高雄餐旅大學）、銀獎10面（得獎者包括金門酒廠、台灣菸酒公司、優米企業、金車噶瑪蘭、國立高雄餐旅大學、霧峰農會酒莊）

〖關於本屆賽事〗

布魯塞爾世界酒類競賽烈酒評選，巡迴世界各地，今年邁入第17屆，在智利拉塞雷納（La Serena）舉辦。

本屆將近一千兩百種參賽酒款，來自54個不同的國家，66位來自22個不同國家的評審團成員，利用8月22日到24日三天的時間，進行評審工作。

評審團每六人一桌，每桌由大會指派一名評審團主席（俗稱桌長），來自台灣的陳千浩與王鵬，都是本屆的評審團成員，並雙雙兼任評審團主席。此外，王鵬也擔任大會《烈酒風味評判準則》（Spirits Sensory Guidelienes）編纂計劃總召集人及主編，這項計畫從兩年前萌芽，一年前正式開始籌備，並於本屆順利推出，成為本屆賽事亮點之一。

根據慣例，各類組最優勝酒款會由十餘位評審團主席，共同選出本屆特別提點酒款。本屆獲此殊榮的品項共有四種：
1. Rhum Blanc Agricole Karukera Canne Bleue by Marquisat de Sainte-Marie Sas, Guadeloupe
2. Château du Tariquet Bas Armagnac Folle Blanche 12 years, France
3. Mezcal Don Aurelio Reposado by Don Aurelio Lamas, Mexico.
4. Ekiss Vodka 2012 by Domaines Francis Abecassis, France.

〖《烈酒風味評判準則》登場〗

我在布魯塞爾世界酒類競賽烈酒評選擔任評審委員，因為相關經驗豐富，擅長品評與風味描述，並通曉多國語言，因此受到該項賽事主辦單位委託，主導烈酒評比標準與風味準則的起草工作。我在這項編纂計畫裡，擔任總召集人與總編輯。這套準則在日前已經如期編纂完成，並將於本年度開始正式使用於國際烈酒大賽。

我在2016年九月，從法國波爾多進修葡萄酒結業，並在上一屆烈酒大賽結束後，就開始著手研擬準則編寫架構，集結國際評審團成員們多年累積的經驗，共同編纂烈酒風味評判標準，作為評審團的評分參考依據。

今年烈酒大賽的評審日程為期三日，在8月22日大會開幕典禮上，將正式發表這部《烈酒風味評判準則》（Spirits Sensory Guidelines），目前這部作品以英文發行。

〖我受邀擔任評審團主席〗

這次大會也邀請我擔任評審團主席，這不是我第一次在酒類競賽裡擔任這項工作，但在烈酒評選裡卻是第一次。評審團主席分為兩個等級，一是評審總長，通常只有一位；二是評審桌長，通常每桌都會指派一位。

我曾經受邀擔任地區級啤酒競賽的評審總長，但由於已經安排前往另一個國際賽事擔任評審，所以很可惜沒有機會接下這項富有挑戰性的任務。評審總長負責規劃賽前評審相關工作配置，確保品評順利，並在賽事進行當下，隨時待命解決突發狀況。

一個賽事的評審團，通常必須拆分成不同桌次，每個桌次可視為一個獨立的評審團。評審桌長，就是這個獨立評審團的主席，通常我們私下都稱為table captain（桌長），但是正式的說法是president of jury（評審團主席）——位階聽起來威風凜凜，但其實就是桌長。身為桌長，任務內容簡單許多，基本上只要確保該桌工作進度沒有落後，文件資料填寫齊全。但是我擔任桌長時，也希望同行專家都能透過討論，從彼此身上學到一些東西，並確保評選結果符合應有水準素質。

在我擔任桌長的經驗裡，同桌的專家們都滿欣賞我的作風，相信我這次也能從同桌的同事們身上，得到同樣的回饋。

〖相關文章連結與電視採訪〗

〈本屆優勝名單〉
http://www.spiritsselection.com/…/PrizeList_Spirits_Selecti…

〈智利國家電視台TVN Canal 24 Horas〉Comenzó concurso mundial de destilados
http://www.24horas.cl/…/comenzo-concurso-mundial-de-destila…

〈智利電視台Ahora Noticias Central MEGA〉2017年8月24日
https://www.facebook.com/AhoraNoticias.Mega/videos/1808116732536317/

〈前進蛋黃區——我個人的一小步，酒類評選的一大步〉2016年11月13日
https://www.facebook.com/paul.peng.wang.wine.beer.spirits.specialist.taster/photos/a.494256434017180.1073741828.445086668934157/1040610686048416/?type=3&theater

〈國際烈酒大賽風味評判標準——由台灣人主導草擬〉2016年9月6日
酒類專家王鵬，接受國際烈酒大賽主辦單位之邀，負責起草世界各類型烈酒的評判標準。這將是台灣人在國際酒類專業舞台上，再次創下的一項成就。
https://www.facebook.com/paul.peng.wang.wine.beer.spirits.specialist.taster/photos/a.494256434017180.1073741828.445086668934157/977909122318573/?type=3&theater

〈台灣奪得五金三銀！〉2016年9月12日
https://www.facebook.com/paul.peng.wang.wine.beer.spirits.specialist.taster/photos/pcb.983723481737137/983720845070734/?type=3&theater

〖演講全文〗王鵬主編《烈酒風味評判準則》正式發表

王鵬主導編纂的《烈酒評判準則》（Spirits Sensory Guidelines）正式推出，是本屆賽事的亮點之一 。以下是王鵬在8月22日大賽開幕典禮上的英文致詞全文，以及中文翻譯。

＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊ ＊

My dear fellow judges,
各位評審團的同仁們，

As a judge, we never stop learning. I believe you feel the same way. There are so much to explore in the world of spirits. The diversity of our drinks and cultural richness behind them are fascinating; yet, its complexity can be frustrating sometimes. No one is a perfect judge. However, we try to do our best and fulfill our mission.
我們身為評審，總是在不斷學習，相信大家都有同感。烈酒的世界，是無止盡的探索。烈酒種類的多樣性與豐富的文化背景，非常引人入勝，然而卻也非常複雜，有時甚至讓人感到挫折。沒有人是完美的評審，但是我們依然盡力而為，完成所託。

And we are lucky being in this family of Spirits Selection, because fellow judges always share thoughts and knowledge at the judging table. I was inspired to collect valuable comments, and compile them into Guidelines, so that such information become available for each member in the team, rather than limited within one single jury at a given table.
我們非常幸運，因為「布魯塞爾世界酒類競賽烈酒評選項目」這個大家庭裡，評審桌邊總是不乏有人慷慨、積極分享自己的想法、知識與經驗。而我心想，若是能夠蒐羅這些討論與分享內容，編成《烈酒評判準則》，那麽全體成員都能共享這些珍貴的資源，而不是限於特定桌次而已。

Hopefully, these guidelines will help you in the challenging task as spirits judge, particularly when you are faced with certain categories that you are less familiar with. We recommend you spend some time on the “Users’ Guide.” You can find it in the beginning of your booklet. Appropriate use of these guidelines will be helpful in your judging, and will ensure our mission in promoting great culture of fine spirits.
烈酒評選工作極富挑戰性，我希望手邊的這部《烈酒評判準則》可以幫助你順利完成評審工作，尤其是當被指派到較不熟悉的酒種梯次時。我建議你花些時間閱讀手冊前面的〈使用指引〉。正確使用準則，能夠幫助迅速掌握類型，提升你的評審工作效率，並落實我們推廣優質烈酒文化的宗旨。

Let’s imagine that each bottle or each sample is a person, and it tries to express itself in its own language. To better communicate, we have to learn its language. The diversity of spirits can be compared to diverse languages, and we managed to bridge over that gap, by revealing the secret of “how to speak its own language,” in other words, how to evaluate the spirits from their unique cultural backgrounds. This is what these guidelines are for.
讓我們來想像一下，你所面對的每一杯烈酒樣本，都是一個人，在品評的當下，它試著用自己的語言跟你溝通。若是我們不懂它的語言，那麼就無法充分交流。烈酒的多樣性，可以比擬為不同的語言。這本《烈酒評判準則》就是要幫助你跨越語言的鴻溝。我們想要確保你能「用它的語言和它溝通」，亦即「用每種烈酒獨特的文化、生產背景與自身標準來評判品質」。

In these Guidelines, we aimed at pointing out common features and frequent faults within each category, and these are often useful tips for judges. We believe, your expertise paired with this powerful tool of Guidelines, will enhance your performance as a judge. I hope you enjoy using these Guidelines before or during judging. Discussions are encouraged, since guidelines themselves are a compilation of these useful comments. When you find them, write them down and send them to us. They are much wanted and desired.
這部準則的編纂重點，在於指出類型特徵與常見缺陷，對於評審工作來說，這些會是非常實用的重要提示。我相信，以各位既有的專業能力與經驗，再搭配使用這部準則，將能讓你如虎添翼。你可以在評審工作開始之前，或者評審工作進行的當下，翻閱類型描述相關內容。在評審工作進行時，我們也鼓勵同桌評審之間彼此討論交換意見。這部準則的編纂初衷，原本就是要收集這類分享內容。而當你發現值得分享的重點，也請記錄下來並告訴我們，我們很需要你的回饋意見。

This document is designed to evolve over time, based on your remarks and suggestions. Some pieces are still missing, but I believe they are about to come, thanks to your feedback. Please capture any thought that arises during judging, and let’s share with the whole team in the next edition. Ever-improving guidelines will help reproduce quality judging, which is of utmost importance for the reputation of the renowned Spirits Selection, where we are united as a family and whose reputation is also ours.
《烈酒評判準則》將根據每一屆評審團的回饋意見進行調整。某些烈酒類型在這個版本裡付之闕如，但是我相信在諸位的協助下，這部準則的內容將漸趨完備。請各位在評選工作過程中，將自己的想法記錄下來，我們才有機會將這些珍貴的內容編進下一個版本裡。不斷修訂改進這部準則，能夠幫助維繫每屆賽事評審工作品質穩定，而這是頗負盛名的布魯塞爾世界酒類競賽烈酒評選項目，能夠維持國際聲望的重要因素之一。我們身為這個團體成員，當然榮辱與共。

I feel so proud and happy being part of the project. Although it was me who took initiative in the creation of these guidelines, were it not for the support of competition organizers and help from fellow judges, the project would not have been carried out with success. We would like to thank all those who have devoted their time and expertise to producing this first version. My special thanks go to Mr. Thierry Heins, who supported this project with great knowledge on spirits and particularly on human resources. He knows his people very well, and always have good contacts. Those fellow judges who contributed to the Guidelines, provided insights and advices, are listed in the Acknowledgements. I believe, in the next edition, this list will definitely grow longer because of your participation.
我感到非常高興與驕傲，參與這項編纂計畫。雖然《烈酒評判準則》是由我倡議主導，但若沒有大會支持與評審團同仁們的協助，也不會在本屆成功推出第一個版本。我們要向所有在這次編纂過程中，付出時間與精力的專家與同仁們表達謝意。我尤其要感謝主任經理提耶里・漢斯，他不僅熟悉烈酒專業，也對評審團人力資源瞭若指掌，總是能夠指引我找到適合的諮詢對象。這次第一版準則順利推出，有賴評審團同仁們提供參考資料與專業審定，在主任經理在方才的致詞中，已經逐一誌謝，各位也可以在手冊裡看到誌謝名單。我相信，因為有各位的支持，明年這份誌謝名單會變得更長。

Thanks for your attention and support. Enjoy your tasting. Let’s get prepared for work!
謝謝各位的聆聽與支持，祝各位品評順利，我們準備開工！

我之前去考也是這樣
大概是考不上就特別記仇吧哈哈哈!
以下中譯....
-----------------------------------------------
// 今日令我感到震驚的一幕 //
今天是我第一次在公眾場合、眾人面前表達我的憤怒與失望。
這一切開始於美好的一日，我以為這天只會因為參觀台北街頭藝術家徵選而更美好。當我看到所有的表演者們都在散佈於中正紀念堂各地的徵選位置準備時，一切都看起來完美極了。但在我看到評審團主席如何對待這些奮力演出的街頭表演者時，我無法對這一切保持沈默。
先讓我說明，每位表演者都必須支付報名費參加街頭藝人的徵選。徵選時他們獲得3分鐘的時間來呈現他們的表演，希望透過徵選獲得街頭藝人證，所以他們可以有機會透過他們熱愛的事物（表演）賺取收入。照片中的這位評審，帶領著一組看起來對觀看或聆聽街頭藝人的表演完全不耐煩的評審團。演出大約進行一分鐘時，他暫停了歌手的演唱，並對歌手說：許多歌手能唱不同語言的歌，像是英文，唱另一種語言！隨後歌手唱了一首台語歌，但大約唱了2句，他就和另一位評審交談，並不在意歌手的表現，這位評審團的主席就離開了，並招手要其他評審跟著他。
這位歌手只唱了不到一分半鐘（他們規定為3分鐘，而且這位評審中途不斷地打斷），請記得，這位評審的出席費是由這些充滿的期待的表演者們支付的，過程中他不斷的踐踏這些藝術家的熱情與努力。沒有任何一個正面的字眼，他的行為就像他是這裡的大老闆，高高在上的看著這些卑微的表演者們。他隨意地與他人閒談以及離場，從未有任何言語或動作上給予任何人肯定。一位擊樂演奏者的呈現被打斷，並被要求演奏不同的內容，第三次時他就離場了，而其他評審就跟著他這麼做。
所以，我禮貌的接近他，詢問他的姓名以及希望索取他的名片。我告訴他我希望未來能與他對談。他鄙視的問我是誰？他用看待一位學生的眼神看著我，但我並不是。我是一位已40歲，並曾於世界各地的大學與藝術節工作的的舞蹈、電影、和教育工作者。
他不想給我他的名片，他看起來很不耐且驚訝有人對此表達意見。所以我說我可以給他我的聯絡資訊，但我們必須對徵選方式做討論。
今天台北市徵選街頭表演者的方式是對整體的藝術工作者與環境的不尊重與侮辱，我不想否定這一切，但他讓我無從選擇。
我和他說，第一點，他對待表演者的方式過於失禮。身為一位教育者，我無法對我所見的保持沈默。
第二點，評選的流程對藝術領域來說並不公正，若他不能尊重藝術家，那他對藝術的觀點又是什麼？我可以看出他對我的發言嗤之以鼻。但他的行為使我無從選擇。他嚴重踐踏這些表演者，我自己身為藝術家與藝術支持者，我必須要做點什麼。
承辦人對我表示道歉，並說程序必須要繼續下去。我和他說我並沒有意思要停止他們，我僅不過是想知道我該怎麼與他們取得聯繫，討論這件事情。如果你對我有足夠的了解，會知道我的個性，我是一個隨遇而安，很好相處的人。我幾乎未曾在公眾場合發過脾氣。但今日他們對在場所有藝術家做的一切，是真正的污辱與踐踏。
我可以從這位傲慢的評審眼裡看得出，他並不在意我的意見。他認為他是權威，而且他的做法是對的，他也總是這麼做。所有的年輕職員總是畏懼他。今天他的無禮、粗暴、傲慢，使我非常想了解他為何這麼做。
事後，幾個人前來感謝我站出來發聲，表示他們也有同感但沒有勇氣對評審、主辦單位反應這些評議、授權機制的問題。其中一位新北市政府承辦人說，她也對藝術家被對待的方式感到難過。
我不懂為什麼人們不為彼此挺身而出。台北市的社會已經失去它的功能，在藝術領域更是嚴重。
身為一個理應支持與保護藝術的機構，不論在文化或專業上，今天他們都完全失格。這一切看起來像是一個考一條狗、一隻貓、一隻鳥和一尾魚去爬樹一樣的荒謬。
我留給了他們我的聯絡資訊，他們說他們會聯絡我，如果他們沒這麼做，這可以是我下一部電影的標題《一部關於那些帶著希望與期待的表演者被如何對待的紀錄片》。
我非常的憤怒，我真的希望能夠改變他們對藝術膚淺的觀點。
翻譯William Lu文章
中文翻譯來自 黃翊
https://www.facebook.com/huangyimoving/posts/1727036437312305

謝謝大家關注這個議題，我剛剛把評審的照片拿掉了，原因是我希望大家不要將這位評審當成壞人，而也我們把焦點專注在這個事件上，而不是人身上，我們才能真正長期的改善這個問題．因為我不會中文，所以我會和我的夥伴們一起再產出一篇更詳盡完整的中文文章，屆時也煩請大家一同關注，讓台灣的藝術環境更好，最好也謝謝幫我翻譯以下文章的朋友，我非常訝異這篇造成的影響力，感謝你們！

I CAUSED A SCENE TODAY IN THE PUBLIC

Today I got very angry and upset for the first time in public in front of a crowd.

What started out as a nice day, I thought it would only get better by attending the street performance artist's exam in Taipei. Everything seemed nice when I saw the performers were all prepared in their provided locations around the Sun Yat Sen Memorial Hall. But after I saw the head of the judge panel treated the street performers while performing, I couldn't keep my mouth shut.

Let me explained: each performer had to pay to register for the license exam. They were given 3 minutes to present their work(s) hoping they'd get a lisence so they can earn some sort of living from their passion. This one particular judge (pictured) leading the group seems impatiently listen and watch the street performers. It barely hit the one minute mark, he aggressively cut into the song of a singer and told the performer "many singers sing in different languages like English etc, sing in another language!"(I paraphrased with my bad Chinese translation). Then the singer started singing in Taiwanese language. But barely two sentences, he talked to another judge barely paying attention to the performer this head judge basically just left and gestured to the rest of the group to follow him.

The singer sang barely a minute and a half (they were promised 3 mins and they kept being interrupted by this judge). Bare in mind, this judge is earning a wage while these hopeful performers were paying him to be there. He basically did the same thing over and over again disregarding the artist's intent and hard work. Not a single word of appreciation. He just acted as he was a big boss looking down on these petty performers. He chatted as he wished and walked away without saying a "thank you" or a gesture of acknowledgement. A percussionist kept being interrupted asking him to do something different. Then he just left after the third time. The rest of the judges just followed.

So, i approached him politely asking for his name and his business card. I told him I wanted to talk to him one on one in the future. Degradingly he asked me who I was. I could see in his eyes that he saw a young man who looked like a student to him. But I was not and am not. I am a 40 year old dance artist, filmmaker and educator that have taught around the globe and in many prestigious colleges and festivals.

He didn't want to give me his business card. He seemed annoyed and surprised that someone spoke up. So I said I can give him my contact info but we needed to talk on how the exam went.

The way Taipei city exams the performers today was both disrespectful and insulting to the arts community in general. I didn't want to say this all out. But he left me with no choice.

I told him, for one, the way he treated the performers was disrespectful. As an educator I could not be quiet when I see something like that. Second, the process of the exam is not doing the art community any justice. If he cannot see the artists as a human being first, then what does it say about his view on the Arts. I could see him pissed off. But again he left me with no choice. He was very degrading towards these performers. As an artist myself and an art advocate I had to do something.

The organizer apologized to me said the process needed to go on. I told him I wasn't trying to stop them. I merely want to know how I could get in touch with them to discuss this. If you know me well enough, you should know my temperament. I am a happy go lucky person. I almost never get angry in the public. But it was genuinely insulting and degrading to every artists based on what I saw today.

This arrogant judge didn't care of my opinion. I could see it in his eyes. He was basically the superior in his world and his way was the right way. That's how he had always done it. All the young staffers there were afraid of him. Today he was disrespectful, rude, and arrogant. I really want to know why he does what he does.

After the incident, a few people came up and thanked me for speaking up. They felt the same way but they didn't have the courage to say it to this judge or the organization that issues these licenses. One organizer from the New Taipei City said even she felt bad seeing how the performers being treated.

I don't understand why people don't stand up for each other. The Taipei City has failed their community and even more so to their arts community.

For an organization that is supposed to advocate for the arts, culture and authenticity, they did miserably today. It is like giving an exam to a dog, a cat, a bird and a monkey then telling them that their exam is climbing a tree. It's absolutely ridiculous.

I left them my contact information. They said they will contact me. If they don't, this could be an interesting subject for my next film project. A documentary on how these hopeful, aspiring performers being treated.

I am mad and I am angry. I really hope they will change their shallow way of seeing Arts.

P.S. Share or repost in Chinese. They need to change. Thanks.

台北國際藝術村－寶藏巖 Taipei Artist Village－Treasure Hill
Taipei National University of the Arts
臺北表演藝術中心 Taipei Performing Arts Center
National Theater and Concert Hall, Taipei
中正紀念堂 Chiang Kai-shek Memorial Hall
National Taiwan University of Arts