thing用法的八卦，YOUTUBE和Yahoo名人娛樂都在討論

消防故事130
「豐功偉業，光榮退休」

今天看到內政部長和四個官都要一起退休，網路上還有篇對葉署長歌功頌德的文章（http://udn.com/news/story/1/1673813），的確消防署是看到任務就接起來給自家基層作，被病患追打家屬告也要自我檢討吃申誡，陳情被說成是廢話，甚至退休前還換了制服和官階…

所以我說那個負責任呢？不是說把基層視為己出、當成兄弟？自請下台沒有，現在申請退休。

算了，我就拿前幾天花栗鼠見到比利時消防總長的經驗來分享，大家自己看就知道了。
-

前幾天，我闖進比利時消防隊總部，見到他們的消防總長。
.
消防總長穿著一身白襯衫，衣擺略略的塞進褲頭裡；發言人用法文跟他解釋我來自台灣，跟搭檔在做消防員的漫畫。他聽完後笑得十分開心，翻了翻漫畫，笑著對我說：「台灣漫畫的閱讀方向跟我們不一樣呢！」
.
我這人官沒有見很多，但一個人誠懇不誠懇，多少還是看得出來。
.
比利時的政治有些混亂，中央政府時常停擺，各單位必需學會自行運作，所以有時候會看到單位機構公幹中央政府，就為了爭預算的場面（譬如2013年的抗議，其實總部有特別派人支援，這在台灣根本無法想像）
.
發言人說，他跟總長是基層消防員當上來的，曾經一起在火場裡出生入死。我們聊起了新屋大火、聊起台灣近一兩年死了不少消防員、聊起余宗翰得到的那句「廢話」、聊起台灣因為警專警大體系的因素，導致很多上位者，其實未曾到過第一線，卻握有決定的權利。
.
總長皺了一下眉，這是這場對談中第一次看到他面露不悅。他斟酌著用字的說，或許是因為他是基層出身吧，所以知道基層要的是什麼，消防員要的不多，要的其實就是安全罷了。
"The first thing I concern is the safety of my men."（我以我弟兄們的安全作為優先考量）
.
我開玩笑的說這句臺詞好帥，如果畫成漫畫，他的戲份裡一定會有這一句。
但他說，這是所有在上位者都該有的思維。
.
是啊，這是所有在上位者，都該有的思維。

-

現在就一起來搶救消防員

------------------------------------------------------------
網路購買「火人FEUERWEHR」 >>>
讀冊網路書局：http://goo.gl/FQLkWG
博客來網路書局：http://goo.gl/XhXLgK
金石堂網路書局：http://goo.gl/ZN80Yv
誠品網路書店：http://goo.gl/yJpz26
「香港」二樓書店：http://goo.gl/aVe4gR
以及各大實體書店、漫畫便利屋都買得到喔！
-------------------------------------------------------------

LINE貼圖
蠢羊與奇怪生物
https://store.line.me/stickershop/product/1113494/zh-Hant
鴿是傳說
https://store.line.me/stickershop/product/1117222/zh-Hant

《流利英文的秘密》

叔叔：由今個星期開始，蕭叔叔的明報專欄由biweekly改為weekly，逢星期一刊出，今次大檸樂。

【明報專訊】蕭叔叔成日同學生講：Conquer the small words, and you’ll conquer the language. 學英文，最難學的，係 is am are was were，of for in at with 這類小字，而不是望落去高深，又長又難讀的字。小字通常有連接意念的作用。好多人學講英文，唔係識字唔夠多，而係唔識將意念串連起來，流暢地表達。

譬如我想講：今日要同大家講我最鍾意嘅課題－正確學習 small words 的重要性。英文唔流利嘅人，可能重點字眼都講得足，就係聽落去唔流利，broken，disjointed。錯誤示範：

Today I talk about something I love. It is important to learn small words

這句就是怪，而且不像說英文的人說話。這句蕭叔叔會怎樣說？假如不怕長氣，場合又唔太formal的話（說話不同書寫，說話假如太少廢字，聽落去反而唔自然）。蕭叔叔示範：

Today it’s a bit of a lovely one for me in that I’m talking about the importance of learning small words, and how it’s gonna contribute to your fluency. It’s something that I’ve been obsessed with since I started teaching English.

唔係話咁樣講先叫做好，因為好多人會認為廢話太多，語氣又不夠肯定（如 a bit of a），and this is only one of the countless number of ways to say the same thing，BUT，咁樣講，的確是正常，自然，流利嘅 informal 英文口語。要聽蕭叔叔開口示範，請 follow the link below：

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hP4FNDKO6hI&feature=youtu.be

分析一下。A bit of a 是日常口語常用 expression，尤其英國人愛用。In that 意思大概就是「因為」。留意 how it’s gonna contribute to your fluency，這是個 noun phrase，通常用正常詞序，而不用問句的詞序（how is it going to）。留意其中 it’s，a，bit，of，a，one，for， in，that，I’m，about，the，and， how，gonna，to，something，with，since，就是我所謂的 small words。要英文說得流利自然，一定要 conquer 這些小字的用法，反而長字，深字，content字，不難學。

再給大家一個例子。英國首相，保守黨的 David Cameron 最近拍了段短片，講英國新的稅務政策。一開首佢咁講：

Today is called Money Back Monday, and the reason for that is that some of the most important tax and pension changes come into place today in the new financial year. And there’re two that I think are particularly important.

又係時候學 small words。大家知道要留意的字啦？is called，and the reasons for that is that，some of the most，come into place，in the，and there’re，that I think are particularly。這些，才是學習的重點。Again，要聽蕭叔叔示範，follow the link below：

https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=hP4FNDKO6hI&feature=youtu.be

那，small words 怎樣學？多聽多講就可以了嗎？錯。假如身不在全英文的環境，只靠多聽多講，不會進步。聽之餘還要動動腦筋，用腦分析，思考，點解呢句說話要咁講，點解呢度要放呢個字。唔好再只看深字長字啦，remember：Conquer the small words, and you’ll conquer the language。蕭叔叔話嘅。

文︰蕭愷一

作者簡介

蕭愷一，aka蕭叔叔。夢想做男神、現實是大叔的英文教學狂熱分子，law grad，哲學碩士dropout，語言學愛好者，以speak English like an educated native為教與學的終極目標。

蕭叔叔的Facebook專頁《蕭叔叔的英文學會》 ：https://www.facebook.com/unclesiu

毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

無印さんは今回約１１００品目の値下げに踏み切りました。
しかも結構大幅値下げで、増税後も価格の変動は無いそうです。
神ですね！！

※UP後に気づきましたが、ノイズ？雑音ひどいですね。。
原因究明しますorz


⬇️チャンネル登録はこちら！SUBSCRIBE HERE!⬇️
http://www.youtube.com/channel/UCb_sptgjsM9RyPPEqqOTdbw?sub_confirmation=1

⬇️ファッションチャンネル FASHION CHANNEL⬇️
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEva6aQhCY1-lEjlzB59RYQ?view_as=subscriber

⬇️Instagram⬇️
https://www.instagram.com/amy.gram____/

⬇️Twitter⬇️
https://twitter.com/amy_tweet__

⬇️スタイルヒント⬇️
@amy.fuku


【Music】
NO.1
Track Name: "It's Near"
Music by: Dj Quads @ https://soundcloud.com/aka-dj-quads
Official YouTube Channel HERE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCusFqutyfTWRqGhC8kHA5uw 
SoundCloud HERE: https://soundcloud.com/aka-dj-quads
Twitter HERE: https://twitter.com/DjQuads
Spotify HERE: https://open.spotify.com/artist/2VZrdImbvB03VWApYtBRr3
Instagram HERE: https://www.instagram.com/djquads

NO.2
Song: LAKEY INSPIRED - Smile
Music Link:https://www.youtube.com/redirect?event=video_description&v=jd4nRLhWQUk&redir_token=Y7SQTg6rDkWy_g49gtiwFI3vTyp8MTU0ODQ3NDA2N0AxNTQ4Mzg3NjY3&q=https%3A%2F%2Fsoundcloud.com%2Flakeyinspired%2Fsmile


NO.3
Track Name: "The Forecast For Today"
Music by: Dj Quads @ https://soundcloud.com/aka-dj-quads
Official YouTube Channel HERE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCusFqutyfTWRqGhC8kHA5uw 
SoundCloud HERE: https://soundcloud.com/aka-dj-quads
Twitter HERE: https://twitter.com/DjQuads
Spotify HERE: https://open.spotify.com/artist/2VZrdImbvB03VWApYtBRr3
Instagram HERE: https://www.instagram.com/djquads

NO.4
Track Name: "www is a thing”
Music By: Dj Quads @ https://soundcloud.com/aka-dj-quads
Original upload HERE - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cqqU...
• DJ QUads YouTube channel HERE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCusF...
• Dj Quads on SoundCloud HERE: https://soundcloud.com/aka-dj-quads
• Dj Quads on Twitter HERE: https://twitter.com/DjQuads
• Dj Quads on Spotify HERE: https://open.spotify.com/artist/2VZrd...
• Dj Quads on Instagram HERE: https://www.instagram.com/djquads/

NO.5
Track Name: “Closing Time”Music By: Jay Man @ http://ourmusicbox.com/Official "OurMusicBox" YouTube Channel HERE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCEXX5i6961zc4-L8thTctBgLicense for commercial use: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY-4.0) License.Full License HERE - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Music promoted by NCM: https://www.youtubetomp3musicdownload.com/


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

【使用機材】
〈SONY α7Ⅲ（カメラ本体）〉
https://amzn.to/34cW3Rw

〈レンズ（TAMRON 28-75mm F2.8 Di Ⅲ RXD(Model:A036）〉
https://amzn.to/3h6Y1q8

〈マイク（アフレコ用/オーディオテクニカ AT2020USB+）〉
https://amzn.to/2Q4eBLf

〈カメラ外付けマイク（RODE video micro）〉
https://amzn.to/2Q0G1BK


※上記製品リンクURLはAmazon.co.jpアソシエイトのリンクを使用しています。

【Amazonリンクの掲載について】
Amazon.co.jpアソシエイト、Amazon.co.jpを宣伝しリンクすることによってサイトが紹介料を獲得できる手段を提供することを目的に設定されたアフィリエイトプログラムである、Amazonアソシエイト・プログラムの参加者です。


------------------------------------------------------------------------------

加入吉娜英文FB 粉絲頁
學習更多美式口語英文
https://www.facebook.com/wordsgo/

**********************
聯絡吉娜：
KK音標
基礎英文從頭學起
學好英文諮詢
請寫信到
webmaster@wordsgo.com

**********************
吉娜家教招生中：
影片中有三個小對話，可以學會What's wrong的用法，有外師的錄音朗讀，還有Gina的口語發音解說，有連音和變音。

三個小對話內容：
對話一：
A: What's wrong? You were late again.
(怎麼了? 你又遲到了。)
B: My car broke down. I need to get it fixed after work.
(我的車拋錨了。下班後我要找人修理。)
A: Do you need a ride to the mechanic?
(你要我載你去找修車師傅嗎?)

對話二：
A: What's wrong? You look upset?
(怎麼了？你看起來不太開心。)
B: I'm feeling sad because my friend moved away.
(我覺得傷心，因為我的朋友搬走了。)
A: I'm sorry to hear that. Do you want to talk about it?
(我很難過聽到這樣的事情。你想說說嗎?)

對話三：
A: What’s wrong with you? Why would you say that awful thing to her?
(你怎麼搞的? 你為什麼對她說這麼糟糕的話? )
B: B: She made me angry.
(她讓我生氣。)
A: You should apologize. She cried because of what you said.
(你應該要道歉。她因為你所說的話哭了。)

-----------------------------
我是Gina，我來自台灣，我是一位英文老師，我喜歡學習英文和教英文。我的職業生涯大部分都在教授文法，但是當我真正想要說英文時，問題來了，我不太能自然表達自己。我開始改變自己的教學和學習目標，我想說英文，這時我才知道文法閱讀與聽說可是很大的不同。我發現口說卡住的是自然造句的能力以及口語發音。我慢慢研究口說語音的變化，透過外師的幫助，我的口說和聽力都變好了！：)

我的影片課程，是我對於英文教學的熱情與成果，我的目標並不是幫助你發音跟美國人一樣，我自己也做不到，因為區域性的口音就不同，每個人都帶著自己母語的影響在說英文，這很棒，這是我們的identity(身分認同)，不要不敢開口。我的課程目標是幫助我自己以及大家，可以輕鬆的發音。了解口語的語音變化，學習時會踏實有力量，開口說英文就會有信心！

#Vivziepop #HELLUVABOSS
我並不擁有此影片 影片所有權歸屬於Vivziepop
I do NOT own this video, all rights go to Vivziepop

贊助影片原作者,幫助她製作更多精彩的動畫!
贊助 HAZBIN HOTEL 的 PATREON 網址: https://www.patreon.com/VivienneMedrano

原影片網址(Original Video Link):
https://youtu.be/kpnwRg268FQ


這次的影片由大麻煩翻譯組
& 栗奇 & Sophie 共同製作

封面是也栗奇大大做的喔！

栗奇的個人頁面:
https://www.facebook.com/ricky.furry.908

與上次一樣同一位會畫畫又會英文的大佬
一樣歡迎大家去他那邊關注他喔！
這次還加上另一位支援者Sophie!
十分感謝他們兩位的幫忙到天亮！

一方面是我前幾天實在很忙
然後我們幾個又在細節吹毛求疵了有夠久XD
才忙到現在哈哈，總之謝謝大家的耐心等候啦～


註解區:

0:50
Stolas是叫他的女兒"Special little starfire"
這顯然是個愛稱，但我們商討後覺得翻出「我特別的小星火」好像太土太不中文了點
中文可以說人對自己很特別，但如果要放在這裡就不能以那樣的順序去闡述
因此就以愛稱的含譯去翻成我「親愛的小星星」了

2:00
"seven rings collapse"的那個七環
在我們瘋狂找資料之後最終從官方推特推論出是以七宗罪去做分類的地獄分層
例如官方曾說過Lucifer(地獄旅店女主角Charlie的爸爸)掌管著傲慢的那層
而這次的Loo Loo Land則屬於Greed(貪婪)的那層地獄區域
資料佐證: https://twitter.com/IMPmurderpros/status/1337287692082503680?s=20

8:30
Blitzo說"I am not a day hooker." 就是說我可不是個在白天出來賣身的
被某阿姨側目後，他說"What? I said I am not one, prude." 就如同字幕那樣
值得一提的是Prude是指那種比較正經或是比較保守而顯得無趣的女人
我們商榷後決定使用這個有點好笑，來自海綿寶寶的說法XD

10:06
這裡的梗恰好被我們的中文字幕遮住了
其實在我們字幕那個「東西」那邊可以看到那隻娃娃有個標籤
上面還真的是寫"thing?" 表示那隻娃娃還真的就是叫做「東西」
所以那兩位才把這個字講的那麼強調XD

10:37
原本我們常說"What the hell" 類似「是怎樣啊」或「什麼鬼啊」的口語用法
但這裡Moxxie想避免造口業所以說了改編版的 "What the heaven is wrong with this thing."

11:11
從這裡開始大家可以明顯地聽到Fizzarolli每次都叫Blitzo "Blitzo" (看不懂齁XD)
試播集的時候Blitzo本人有強調過他的名字裡面的o是不發音的
因此唸起來其實是"Blitz" (可以回去看第一集或是仔細聽其他人叫Blizto)

因此後面 11:19
在Blitzo強調 "The O is silent now." 「我名字的o現在不發音了」之後
被Fizzarolli反嗆 "Just like your audience always was when you told your lazy jokes here."
延伸上句的silent(安靜) Fizzarolli嗆說這個silent是跟當年你在這裡工作的時候講爛笑話觀眾的反應(安靜)一樣嗎?

11:35
人be salty 帶有那個人惱羞成怒或是不服輸而不悅或生氣等意思

13:02
這段有夠靠北XD Nathan好慘=__=
其實還能看到娃娃頭有掉眼淚

14:10
Stolas對女兒說 "I know it's a lots. I should have listened."
我們的解讀是這樣的「我知道(我後來跟你母親處的不好以及出去跟別的人鬼混等事情)令你難以消化/承受/接受」「我當初應該好好傾聽妳的想法的(就不會讓妳累積痛苦到今天了)」

15:17
Stylish Occult是一家店的名字喔
Loona也有去過呢，可以在她的IG上看到
資料佐證: https://www.instagram.com/p/CGwCZzMAbDd/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link
而Stolas後來似乎也真的幫他女兒買了個標本
資料佐證: https://www.instagram.com/p/CIl9U5LAIZW/?utm_source=ig_web_copy_link




希望大家能多多支持我們翻譯組!
訂閱頻道追蹤更多我們的影片!
IG看我們的日常與製作進度: weed99coco1
關於我們翻譯組: https://home.gamer.com.tw/creationDetail.php?sn=4035888
動畫與額外翻譯的網誌:https://weedtrouble.blogspot.com/
我們的Twitter: https://twitter.com/TransWeedVABOSS