that which用法的八卦，PTT和Yahoo名人娛樂都在討論

【同志驕傲月🏳️‍🌈 我台灣我驕傲】

6月是同志驕傲月，快去搜尋引擎查詢，有彩蛋 !!

同志驕傲月緣起自1969年6月的美國「石牆酒吧事件」，警方臨檢與同志發生流血衝突，而開啟了一系列同志族群爭取權益的序幕，因此也將6月視為 #同志驕傲月。

台灣🇹🇼自2003年起每年10月底舉行同志大遊行，至2019年成為 #亞洲第一個同性婚姻合法化的國家；2021年初司法院提出涉外民事法律適用法第46條修正草案，希望未來可以擴大與外籍人士結婚的適用範圍，進一步實現 #愛情沒有界線 的普世價值。

正如彩虹旗上的多元顏色，每個人都不同，都應獲得同等的人權與尊重，台灣正致力與理念友我相近國家共同努力，打造一個LGBTQI友善的環境，讓所有人都能以最真實的樣貌，驕傲自信地長大，勇敢的去愛、追求屬於自己的幸福。

June is #LGBTQIPrideMonth, commemorating the #StonewallRiots in the #US back in 1969. We’ve seen progress in many countries around the world since then in terms of the rights of LGBTQI+ citizens, including in Taiwan, which legalized #SameSexMarriage in 2019.
We continue to move forward with late February seeing the introduction of a draft bill from the Judicial Yuan which would remove certain restrictions applied to transnational same-sex marriages.
The law should not stop you from being who you really are or loving who you love. Taiwan is proud to be a pioneer in Asia in respecting #HumanRights. We hope that the people of this country can take pride in being themselves.

毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

我們呼籲市民出席今天晚上八時於公民廣場外的集會，讓我們以最響亮的咆哮，向中共宣示香港人的決心不會因此而退縮。我們相信，威權永遠敵不過真理，人民終將獲得勝利。

【聲明】
中共粗暴釋法 辱沒港人意志
議會制衡勢危 民主路見艱難

高等法院剛就特區政府入稟取消四名議員資格的司法覆核作出裁決，羅冠聰、劉小麗、梁國雄及姚松炎被裁定喪失立法會議席，不單象徵香港民主的倒退，連同早前被褫奪議席的梁頌恆及游蕙禎，合共超過名十八萬名五千名市民的聲音遭藐視。香港眾志強烈譴責政府褫奪民選議員議席並打壓民主人士。

宣誓風波源於香港政府濫用法律手段逼害民選議員，北京政府甚至不惜賠上破壞法治的代價，自行僭建基本法，圖一切手段把反對聲音拒於議會之外。律政司兩度入稟褫奪民選議員資格，試問毫無民意授權的港府憑甚麼辱沒人民的意志，難道這十八萬名市民不配擁有代議士？今天我們被奪去的，不只是作為議員的四個議席，不只是作為民主派的關鍵否決權，不只是作為代議士為監察政府的抱負，不只是作為選民的政治權利，更是作為香港人最基本的自由與尊嚴。這從來不是幾個人的事，是七百萬香港人的事。

香港眾志及羅冠聰感謝法律團隊多個月來的幫助，他們竭盡所能研究及整理文獻，並提供專業意見。我們也特別感謝所有在去年立法會選舉投下神聖一票的選民，2016年極高的投票率不但顯示市民監察政府的決心，更反映選民透過選票表達對民主自由的追求。目前，香港眾志正在考慮上訴以捍衛香港市民表達聲音的權利。

在這個黑白顛倒的世代中，我們失望，我們憤怒，但我們不敢怠慢，不忘一顆矢志為香港人服務的心。不論我們在議會，在社區，我們仍會謹守崗位，繼續推進民主，爭取落實普選制度。我們呼籲市民出席今天晚上八時於公民廣場外的集會，讓我們以最響亮的咆哮，向中共宣示香港人的決心不會因此而退縮。我們相信，威權永遠敵不過真理，人民終將獲得勝利。

香港眾志
2017年7月14日

------------------------
‼️八點，集結。‼️
日期：7 月 14 日（星期五）
時間：下午 8 時
地點：金鐘公民廣場
------------------------

STATEMENT REGARDING HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT

As ruled in the judgment handed down today, Nathan Law, Lau Siu Lai, Leung Kwok Hung and Edward Yiu lost their Legislative Council seats. Together with the previously disqualified Baggio Leung and Yau Wai Ching, more than 180,000 voters had their voices silenced in the legislative body. Demosisto condemns the manifest interference of the Beijing government to cripple Hong Kong's legislative power through reinterpretation of the Basic Law - a constitutional document agreed upon in the Sino-British Joint Declaration of 1984.

This is the second time that the Department of Justice attempted to oust democratically-elected lawmakers, in addition to the already ongoing political persecution and removal of veteran democratic activists and leaders of the Umbrella Movement. In light of manipulation of election results by Beijing, it is more important than ever for Hong Kong to stay strong and firm against the autocracy. We implore Hong Kong citizens to acknowledge the significance of this judgment and mobilise to prevent further intervention and political persecution against other pro-democracy legislators.

Nathan Law thanks the endeavour of the entire legal team for their tireless preparations and professional advice. He also delivers his heartfelt gratitude to all who came to support him at the court and every citizen who voted in the Legislative Council Election in September 2016, in which Hong Kong saw the highest turnout rate in elections since the transfer of sovereignty. Direct election ensures that the people take part in monitoring the government and therefore having a voice.

The party supports the lawmakers' decision to appeal in order to restore the voice of the civil society. Demosisto will continue to engage itself actively in community work and policy research, and is determined to ensure the well-being and rights of Hong Kong citizens, especially at this time of peril. The fight for democracy and universal suffrage will only amplify, for time is on our side.

Demosisto
14 July 2017

我的文法課程 ▶ https://grammar.cool/
我的發音課程 ▶ https://columbus.cool/

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨

我的免費講義 ▶ https://columbus.english.cool/
我的英語教學部落格 ▶ https://english.cool/
我的 FB ▶ https://www.facebook.com/littlecolumbus
我的 IG ▶ @littlecolumbus

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨

課程相關問題請聯絡 ▶ courses@english.cool
合作邀約請聯絡 ▶ columbus@english.cool

✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨

我是哥倫布！我是在加拿大長大的香港人！現在喜歡在 YouTube 做出有趣好懂的英文教學內容。
YouTube 頻道外，我在 2020 年創立了 English.Cool 英文庫，目前已成為台灣/香港地區 No.1 英文教學資訊網站！

#高評価とコメントがパワーになります!
英単語クイズの答え
↓





last strawというのは直訳すると最後のストロー。意味は「我慢の限界」という意味です。
語源が「It's the last straw that breaks the camel's back（どんなに重いものも運べるラクダでも、どこかのラインでストロー一本さえ乗せれなくなる極値点がある）」ということわざから来ています。




「【高校英語】関係詞」
を初めからご覧になりたい方はこちらからどうぞ☆
https://www.youtube.com/playlist?list=PLd3yb0oVJ_W2yeeZEb7ZBnjlOxsm5RxJm


【前回の動画はこちらからどうぞ！】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4KnB-FKPw5A&feature=youtu.be

「チャンネル登録」はこちらからどうぞ！☆
https://youtu.be/HeN3L9QM8FI

【超わかる！授業動画とは】
「東大・京大・東工大・一橋大・旧帝大・早慶・医学部合格者」を輩出！「学年トップ」「全国偏差値70以上」続出中！本物の実績がある唯一のYouTubeチャンネル！難関大合格に必須の重要問題だけを「圧倒的に丁寧・コンパクト」に解説！チャンネル登録者から感動の声多数！大手予備校で500人以上の生徒を1:1で授業したプロ講師の「独創性」「情熱」の世界は、君を夢中にさせる！さぁ、今すぐ始めよう！

■講義プリントはこちら（４ページです）
http://eduplotion.com/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/80553c340205a71582334a51759665bf.pdf

■動画内容
✔️　制限用法、非制限用法の意味は？
✔️　一瞬で違いがわかる図解！
✔️　ネイティヴが使う２種類の非制限用法
✔️　非制限用法を使う時の２つの注意点


■自己紹介

久次米智（くじめさとし）

奈良県出身　塾講師、英語講師、小中の特別支援員、英語アシスタント、少年野球のコーチ等数多くの教育活動をしている。

同志社大学グローバルコミュニケーション学部卒

中学の時から英語の数々に疑問を持つが、納得した答えを得られず英語が嫌になる（笑）浪人時代に予備校の先生から深い英語を学び、英語の楽しさを再認識する。その後独学で英語を勉強。大学では認知言語学を中心に言語について学び、その知識と受験英語を組み合わせて学校教育に役立つ英語を世に広めている。塾では中学、高校生に対して核心をついた英語を伝える授業を展開し、約５００人中、授業コンテストランキング「優秀賞」を取った経験もある。

中学生、高校生だけにとどまらず、大学生、社会人などにも英語を伝えており、自身の英語メルマガ【下克上英語メルマガ】ではこれまでの英語の誤解を紐解き、楽しい丸暗記をなくした英語を広めていて参加者に好評！
https://maroon-ex.jp/fx45112/H38bXy%20



■ブログ
・ 久次米智　公式教育ブログ　
「http://eduplotion.com/」

教育、心理、自己啓発を中心に幅広くブログを書いています。大学生を対象にした「学べる物語ブログ記事」も書いてますよ〜


■教育メルマガ
自身の経験を元にした教育メルマガを発行中。

教育メルマガ（10秒で登録できます）
　「https://maroon-ex.jp/fx45112/Caf066」

教育、自己教育に関して、無料メルマガを発行しています！「マンガ　ワンピース」「お笑い芸人　さんまさん」「日本の神話」「塾での経験」「少年野球での実例」「日本の偉人　吉田松陰」「人間関係の法則」「ラテン語」などいろんな題材から教育について切り込んでいます。どうぞ、立ち寄ってみてください。


■電子書籍

　「大学生活をパーにする人　バネにする人: 〜あなたの見る世界を変える19の視点〜」
http://amzn.to/2DbEQeZ


２ 「個別塾講師の学ぶ心に火をつける39のプラチナルール」
http://amzn.to/2H5Sv5l

Amazonで好評発売中