successfully中文的八卦，YOUTUBE和Yahoo名人娛樂都在討論

怎麼想也沒想到，武漢肺炎會意外的讓台灣人有了共同的光榮感，如果台灣人可以因此更加團結的話，應該是這個疫情，幫台灣上的最珍貴的一課！


請大家先看一下這段英文：


「Taiwan, despite being just 100 miles from mainland China with regular flights to and from Wuhan, has successfully staved off the worst of the coronavirus pandemic. The country has so far seen five deaths and just under 350 confirmed cases, and most schools and businesses remain」

這段英文是說，「台灣距離中國只有100英里，也有往返武漢的定期航班，卻成功地避免了嚴重的冠狀病毒大流行。台灣這個國家，目前有將近350例確診病例，5例死亡，大部分的學校和企業都持續運作沒有關閉」。

相信大家會說，這就是對台灣社會現狀的表述，很持平啊！
為什麼要叫大家看這段英文？實在有點摸不著頭緒齁！

但是如果告訴你，這段話是芭芭拉・史翠珊（Barbra Joan Streisand）發的推特呢？
沒錯，就是那個集歌手、電影演員、導演、製片於一身的芭芭拉・史翠珊 ; 就是那個得了兩座奧斯卡金像獎、十座葛萊美獎、五座艾美獎、九座金球獎的芭芭拉・史翠珊。

芭芭拉・史翠珊是在台北時間4月5號中午12點37分發了這則推特，緊接著自己在這則推特下面，做了說明...

「open. How did Taiwan do it? “Aggressive action,” says Dr. Jason Wang, the former project manager for Taiwan’s National Health Insurance Reform Task-force. He is now the director of the Center for Policy, Outcomes and Prevention and associate professor of pediatrics and medicine」

中文的意思是「台灣是怎麼做到的？就是採取積極行動！」，而這個Jason Wang就是前陣子投書力讚台灣科技防疫的史丹佛大學副教授王智弘（他曾經在我們健康保險改革特別工作組工作過）。王智弘在投書裡說，台灣很早就建立健保資料庫，因此可以在短時間內有大數據連結使用。沒多久芭芭拉・史翠珊就又留言，附上王智弘接受美國媒體訪問的youtube連結。

--

台灣棒棒！

不要讓防疫工作破功，大家多多配合中央的指揮。

【After Winning Majority in LegCo: Beijing's Crackdown May Trigger International Intervention】

***感謝Hong Kong Columns - Translated，將我早前撰寫『議會過半想像：以「#國際攬炒」反制「臨立會2.0」』長文（https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.313299448762570/2887650867994069/）翻譯成英文，鼓勵國際社會關注立會選舉一旦過半的沙盤推演，在最惡劣形勢下的制衡策略。***

中文精簡版本：https://www.facebook.com/joshuawongchifung/photos/a.564294826996363/2888641404561682/

Hongkongers have experienced our revolution for over half a year. They no longer take a consequentialist view to the effectiveness of their movement as they did years ago, or waste time second-guessing the intentions and background of fellow activists. Following the defensive battles at CUHK and PolyU, November’s District Council election saw a great victory of unity. More marvellous is the union between peaceful and “valiant” protesters.

In the process of resisting tyranny, the people have realised that one cannot prioritize one strategy over another. This is also how the common goal of “35+” came into being—the hope that we will win over half of the seats in the Legislative Council (LegCo) this September, such that the political spectrum that represents the majority of Hongkongers is able to gain control of legislative decisions. The political clout of Hongkongers will increase if 35 or more seats are successfully secured on our side. It is certainly one vital step to achieve the five demands within the system.

The possibility of realizing legislative majority

Technically it is not unrealistic to win a majority even under the current undemocratic system. Back in the 2016 LegCo election, we already won 30 seats. In addition to the District Council (First) functional constituency seat that is already in the pocket of the pan-democrats, as long as the candidates in Kowloon East and New Territories West do not start infighting again, we could safely secure 33 seats based on the number of pan-dem votes in 2016.

The other 3 seats required to achieve a majority depend on democrats’ breakthrough among the functional constituencies by dispersing the resources of the Liaison Office. They also count on whether the turnout this September could exceed 71.2% — that of last year’s District Council elections. Some of the factors that could affect the turnout include: will the epidemic persist into the summer? Will there be potential violent repression of protests in the 2 weeks preceding the election? Will Hong Kong-US relations be affected by the downturn of the global economy?

Therefore, the ambition of “35+” is to be prioritised by the resistance as both a means and an end. I have already expressed my support for an intra-party primary at the coordination meeting. In the meantime, it is pleasing to see the ongoing debates reaching a consensus of maximising the seats among geographical constituencies in the upcoming election.

Whilst enthusiastic coordination, we should also assess the post-election landscape and gauge Beijing’s reactions: if we do not reach 35 seats, Hong Kong will be subject to tighter control and more severe repression by China; but if the democratic parties successfully form a majority in LegCo, CCP’s fears of a “constitutional crisis” would become imminent. Hence, the key questions are how the Pan-Democrats should deal with the volatile political situation in Hong Kong and how they are going to meet Beijing’s charge head-on.

Watching out for Beijing’s dismissal of LegCo after reaching majority

To take back control of LegCo such that it faithfully reflects the majority’s principles and needs is the definition of a healthy democracy. Recently, however, DAB’s Tam Yiu-chung has warned that the plan of the Pan-Dems to “usurp power” in the LegCo would only lead to Beijing’s forceful disqualification of certain members or the interpretation of the Basic Law. This proves that winning a majority in LegCo is not only a popular conception but also a realistic challenge that would get on the nerves of Beijing. Could Beijing accept a President James To in LegCo? These unknown variables must be addressed upon achieving a majority.

While there is no telltale sign as to Beijing’s exact strategy, we are already familiar with the way CCP manipulated the Basic Law in the past 4 years. Having experienced three waves of disqualifications in LegCo, twice kicked out of LegCo with my team, and thrice locked up in jail, I have no false hopes of an easy compromise from Beijing: they would not let Pan-Dems control LegCo for half a year and wait (as is the proper procedure) until after having negatived the Budget to dissolve the legislature, and thereby giving them an easy victory in the re-elections. The greater the Pan-Dems threaten Beijing’s rule in Hong Kong, the more likely that it will trigger Beijing’s repression.

Since the disqualification and arrest of lawmakers have already become “normalised”, one can even imagine the police stepping into the LegCo building to force Pan-Dems into voting. Neither is it beyond our imagination to expect the CCP to kick out all 70 lawmakers in a fit of rage and replace them with a provisional LegCo “2.0” [HKCT note: The first was from 25 Jan 1997 to 30 Jun 1998]. To depend on a majority that could lead to a chapter of a “new testament” for One Country, Two Systems is perhaps what many elites long for, but they are overly optimistic:for a ticket to the promised land will not be available at the Chief Executive election campaign a year and a half later.

Admittedly, the Pan-Dems cannot unilaterally initiate “Laam-chaau” [HKCT note: mostly translated into “scorched-earth” mentality or “mutual destruction”; some even translated into “If I burn, you burn with us”]. The most they can do is to force a standstill of the government, and not for long the LegCo will have been eliminated from the equation to make the wheels turn again. It all leaves the plan of “Negativing the motion → Dissolving LegCo → Re-election after re-election → the stepping down of Carrie Lam” merely as overly positive speculation, probably resulting from their overestimate of CCP's capacity for rational calculation. The Pan-Dems must guard their frontlines and recognise what the biggest threat from Hong Kong to China could be. In this case, should LegCo sessions be disrupted or suspended, the Pan-Dems would have to be well prepared to surmount the expected obstacles and prevent the disqualification crisis 4 years ago—a Catch-22 indeed.

Productive tension from global intervention: Using Laam-chaau against the CCP

What aggravates the CCP the most is the potential threat to Hong Kong’s unique status as the one and only “separate customs territory”. Any miscalculation will compromise its role as the Chinese economy’s “white gloves”. Imagine if CCP were to disqualify all 70 elected lawmakers and convene a meeting north of the Shenzhen River to pass a resolution to Hong Kong’s affairs (much like the Provisional Legislative Council “1.0" in 1997), how great will the shock be in a world with an effective Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act? However hard it is to predict the future one thing is certain: With the US presidential election just around the corner, blows to the separation of powers would not be tolerated, and the West would necessarily effect countermeasures against the Hong Kong government.

Beijing has been relying upon Hong Kong to navigate the international community for decades. While clamping down on the political freedom of the cosmopolitan city, Beijing desires to maintain the financial centre’s economic freedom. Hence, we started lobbying for the Hong Kong Human Rights and Democracy Act four years ago, and today we are determined to promote “Laam-chaau” on an international scale.

The will of the voters must be reflected in an election. If a “35+” legislature were to be dismissed and replaced, such flagrant violation of democracy would assuredly cause a greater backlash than the infamous extradition bill. Knowing what the reality ahead of us could be, we have to combine our election and international strategies to oppose the placement of a 35+ LegCo with an “Emergency Legislative Council 2.0”, to advance an international “Laam-chaau” to Hong Kong’s status as “separate customs territory”. Only then will we stand a chance to resist the regime and to realise the five demands.

Adjusting our mindset: Overcoming the “constitutional crisis” to reach a resolution

Upon the realization of the “35+” LegCo, it is expected that the CCP will launch a devastating counterattack. The Pan-Dems should not expect LegCo to run normally; neither can the lawmakers realise their governing blueprints they have for Hong Kong. Rather, candidates will be able to compete against one another with visions of a liberated Hong Kong through popular vote. Bringing this point up has nothing to do with undermining the common goal of reaching a majority in LegCo, but rather channels the battle of LegCo to positive use upon the rule of law’s death and a “constitutional crisis” ahead. Knowing that Hongkongers have nothing to fall back on, all Pan-Dems should not miss the only way to the realization of “35+”.

Thus, be they partisans, nonpartisans, incumbent politicians, amateur politicians, or the civil society as a whole – if we stay in the political discourse of 2016 and continue to perpetuate old stereotypes, that is to deal with the divisions on the pan-democratic camp by favouring the most “local” faction; to consider only resource allocation and self-aggrandizement as the purpose of a LegCo campaign; to ignore how potential lawmakers are fitted to what specific roles; to turn a blind eye to the journey of resistance since last summer (extending indefinitely into the future)—They would lead as astray and cost us lose a precious opportunity for change by winning a 35+ majority.

The extent to which the pan-democrats can stay united in light of the political atmosphere since last summer is another problem that our side must to address. Before the watershed moment of 12th June 2019, many democratic delegates were trapped in the mentality of needing to “preserve people’s livelihood”, “be content of what we have accomplished”, and other strategies that favours stability. As the government refuses to heed to the five demands, whether the democrats, especially those in the functional constituencies, have the political will to go all-in is the real difficult question that confronts us in the upcoming LegCo election.

All in all, if “35+” cannot be realised, it is unsurprising to see LegCo being more heavily suppressed in the next 4 years; even if "35+" is achieved, it is questionable whether the pan-democrats are able to weather multiple attacks, verbal or physical, from the regime (judging from its power in the last four years) and utilise the international Laam-chaau strategy against the displacement of LegCo. Adhering to the motto of “we fight on, each in his own way”, I can only hope that Hongkongers in elections, street confrontations and international front can reconcile with each other, so that we may collectively compel the government to yield to our demands in the next six months. It is only by reaching a resolution before a real constitutional crisis that we can combat the institutional violence of the regime and not be devoured by it.

https://hkcolumn.blogspot.com/2020/04/joshua-wong-after-winning-majority-in.html?fbclid=IwAR216gf53pG_j9JOpDfr2GItvjLfrFSekKTPzoEs3-s9KBqvPEwz865P8vw

看這麼多粉絲頁都在回顧去年的成就，想我也來一個好了😆 感謝2017年大家的愛戴，讓我們能夠成功八公斤環球一年並且回台灣開分享會❤️ 雖然當時許多網友都叫我們出書，但說實話我覺得這是不可能的事，畢竟我只是寫好玩，用詞都很簡單，中文程度還不到可以寫書的地步😥 沒有想到去年四月收到編輯的 email，經過半年的努力，一本書完成了📖 真的很感謝大家😍

雖然今年沒有在"旅遊"，但還是飛了墨爾本，雪梨，黃金海岸，伯斯，紐西蘭✈️ 外加五個禮拜個非洲之旅，去了六個國家，看了許多野生動物🦁

原以為當背包客比較辛苦，沒想到回到現實生活中更忙碌😂 除了當全職學生讀建築文憑，也兼職本業，寫作，安排澳洲婚禮，完全沒有一天可以放空😆 有時候確實會喘不過氣來，但也覺得過的很充實🙂 期待 2018年可以過得更好，讓人生沒有遺憾！#希望大家都朝著夢想前進 #迎接新的一年

Happy New Years everyone ❤️ It was such an eventful year 2017, thanks for everyone who's been part of our lives 😘

Not only we successfully backpacked 365 days with 8 kg backpack & travelled 35 countries✈️ Got paid to talk about our travels💵 We completed Certificate IV in Building & Construction 🔨 Got married after 3 year of engagement💒 I published a book and is officially an author 📖

Travelled to Melbourne, Sydney, Canberra, Gold Coast, Perth, New Zealand to see my friends❤️ Went to 6 African countries, camped🏕️ and saw lots of wild animals🦁

Honestly I don't think I had time to sit down to relax and think of nothing 😆 Backpacking was less stressful 😂 Look forward to 2018 and tick more bucket lists 😘✅ #newyearresolution #bye2017 #hi2018

去年夏天看到Dainese Smart Jacket 實品就想入手，中間斷貨好久，終於等到今年初才買到。可惜疫情爆發，還沒好好穿過。現在科技進步，短短幾年，不管是車還是騎士裝備的安全性都大幅升級。有能力選購新產品真的可以多看看，希望未來價格也會更普及化。I first saw this on display at WSBK Laguna Seca round. Tried to pre-order but it was always sold out. Finally ordered it successfully earlier this year. Too bad I haven't had much chance to really wear this product. Rider technology has advanced dramatically over the years. If you have the means, definitely check these new products out. There's no such thing as over protection when it comes to riding. Hopefully the price will come down more.

Bike: Yamaha WR250X

MotoVlog 211 摩托日記第兩百一十一篇

Outro Music: Trixtor - Just This Once

討論和使用的影片器材 Video equipment as used and discussed:
GoPro Hero 7: https://amzn.to/2PFHRZZ
Insta 360 One R: https://bit.ly/2wMzAMz
Insta 360 One X: https://bit.ly/338kigg

GTA 5 PC LSPDFR # 5 ! Another GTA 5 police episode ! GTA V ! Gonna love GTA 5 more and more ! police brutality !

So i brought the Spike Strip mod into this episode . And Tackle some fighting situation .. you know watching 2 noobs figting like child play LOL

And successfully came up with an Illegal street race , saw some crazy shit and finally blow suspect's vehicle with my Spike Strip !
Yeah !
So I hope you enjoy this video ~ :)

Mash the LIKE button and the SHARE button if u do love what you are watching ! That will be cool and awesome !

Follow Me To See More Videos !
Facebook : https://www.facebook.com/Claymmorez
Twitter : https://twitter.com/Claymmorez
Google+ : https://plus.google.com/u/0/+Claymmorez/posts?hl=en_US


Download link :
LSPDFR : http://www.lcpdfr.com/files/file/7792-lspd-first-response/
Police Radio : http://www.lcpdfr.com/files/file/7866-coroner-tackle-suspect-tow-plate-checker-pit-request-barrier-police-radio-early-version/
Vehicle Search : http://www.lcpdfr.com/files/file/7894-vehicle-search-search-the-trunks-of-vehicles/
Improved lighting : http://www.lcpdfr.com/files/file/7715-improved-spotlight-and-led-lighting-updated-no-starburst-version/
Breathalyzer : http://www.lcpdfr.com/files/file/7892-breathalyzer/
Speed Radar : http://www.lcpdfr.com/files/file/7789-speed-radar/
Traffic Control : http://www.lcpdfr.com/files/file/7953-traffic-control-beta/
Spike Strips : https://www.gta5-mods.com/scripts/drop-spikes-mod-for-lspdfr
StraysCallouts : http://www.lcpdfr.com/files/file/8055-strayscallouts/
Keep Calm : http://www.lcpdfr.com/files/file/7969-keep-calm-beta-reduce-ai-panic-attacks-when-shots-are-fired/

If you enjoy , Sub to my channel here ! And I will be grateful for getting your support !
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCGQkTq3v3g8q9TeNZ7asI_A





--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
"Tags"
GTA V,GTA 5,Grand Theft Auto V,Grand Theft Auto 5,Grand Theft Auto,Rockstar Games,gta 5 first person,Rockstar,gta v first person,official,games,gaming,vid­eo games,Grand Theft Auto ,montage,Video Game (Industry),car meet,meet,community,stunts,epic,drive,next gen,xbox one,ps4,xbox, playstation ,Short Film ,gangster,short film,video editor,pc,cinematic,editor,Rockstar Games,Funny,Best,gameplay max settings,mods,mod gameplay,heist,online gameplay,best mod,cheats,crazy,amazing,old man,showoff,superman,super powers,superman mod,epic police chase,first person pc,first person pc gameplay,1st person,The flash,Speed,running,the flash time travel,wtf moments,best cars,massacre,100 ways to die,car stunts,stunts montage,gta v gameplay pc,gta v crazy,gta v heist online gameplay,gta 5 funny fails,gta v funny fails,gta v funny mods,gta v character customisation,gta 5 diving,gta 5 dress like a gangster,gta 5 5 star escape,gta 5 5 star survival,gta 5 5 star army,gta 5 army,gta 5 falling off buildings,super car,super car hong kong,nitrous boost,perfect driving,gta 5 perfect driving,nitrous mod,nitro mod,gta 5 crashes and accidents and deaths,gta 5 crashes and fails,

Korea CBT3 韓服封測

由於沒時間玩, 試玩就應該差不多到這裡了 (ΘдΘ；)
此職業操作應該很難,
只是看後期會不會比較有效率的打怪.

Here's a record for my bokor gameplay & walkthrough. Thanks TOSBASE for sharing the English translation pack,
changed into Rank 2 successfully.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

本人來自馬來西亞,
目前主要分享 PC & 手機遊戲,
目前嘗試實況中.
歡迎訂閱 ^ ^