DSE Final Reminders - Paper 3 (Listening)
大家都考完第一日既兩份卷,今日應該好多題目都輕鬆過關!
衝埋今晚去!總之再提多次,唔好對卷同埋因為今日份卷而影響心理質素喇!
快啲 check下究竟你部機係唔係OK,會唔會考完中文之後壞左 (以防萬一)。可能唔係部機壞,而係條 earphone 壞,check 下有冇電添有任何野壞,快D買返。
溫習:
1. 如果唔想溫技巧住就拎我《Finale》裡面提供嘅 Vocabulary List 或者《Word Power》書仔睇下D字先一邊睇,一邊聽,一邊串返啲字。
2. 溫返我講過常見嘅 Question Types 嘅 notes,留心返我堂上所教既一切 hints 位同埋要小心嘅地方。
3. 而家呢刻,應該拎我堂上教過嘅題目(包括 Regular Books 3 & 6, All-round Book 3, Final Hit, Ultimate Intensive Book U2, Elite Listening,仲有 past papers),先溫熟 Long Task 技巧:
- 掌握 Long Tasks 做嘅步驟
- 溫熟 take notes 方法及 cue words
- 記住由睇 instructions 時,去到睇 DF 搵每個 point 我堂上寫過、mark 過、講過嘅野,咩係重點,咩唔係
- 特別留心我教改寫、撮寫部分,甚至最難嘅 use your own words 題型(記住大部分 key words 真係原文抄,只改含糊字/pronouns)
- 溫下數字表達,記住可以計數
- 溫下 question forming 的技巧
- 特別溫熟6大格式:letter、article、proposal、report、editorial、speech
4. Short Tasks 就特別溫熟以下5大題型:
- Form-filling / Sentence Completion / Flow Chart 的 take notes 方法及提示字眼
- Map / Plan / Picture 的 key words
- Ranking 的 key words
- Question Formation 的 steps
- Speakers’ Attitude 的做法
5. 大家需要聽下英文,可以做我嘅 mock exam paper,未必全份做,可只做 Part B。
6. 聽日就最好朝早係咁聽英文既野例如係咁聽我俾大家嘅 mock 或者 question types,亦可以係英文電台節目等個腦充滿英文(同考試相關嘅 mock exam / past papers 聲帶會更好),因為你都要有個準備作戰既狀態作為一個 warm up 嘅機會,搭車、開考前都可以聽下。
留心:
出門口之前 make sure 你帶左收音機同 earphone !!!!!
同埋真係有電check埋有冇帶鉛筆、擦膠
仲有,可以的話唔好用塗改液,用改錯帶
考試時:
要真係明白果份題目個 theme 係咩,因為絕對會影響大家做卷既時候你聽唔聽得明,以致你會唔會寫錯左第二個答案
用鉛筆做 Part A,方便改正,但記住一邊聽就唔好一邊擦先刪走錯
記住:
1. 準備時間按返我堂上講既你要準備既事唔好只 underline / highlight 重點,要諗下唔同 question types 用咩字帶答案出黎 (e.g. aim = ??? reason = ???),仲有語文要求,留心使唔使用 complete sentence 或者用 verb 開始定係一個 noun phrase 已足夠,如果有 example 提供一定以 example 嘅寫法作準
2. 如果係圖片/選擇題準備時間一定分晒佢地有咩同有咩唔同分下: 大小、多少、遠近、形狀、人物特徵 (男女、高矮肥瘦、面部特徵等) 等各樣野
地圖要留心邊度係起點,留心東南西北上下左右等可能
問作者 attitude,留心語氣同埋分正反
3. 記住題與題之間會有可能相關準備時間亦要諗下會唔會某兩題講嘅野係一樣
4. Part B記住睇時間做,小心時間分配 (基本上每個 task 20-25分鐘一定要完成):
成個過程包括:睇指示、搵points、思考需唔需要改寫或綜合、分類及分段、寫intro、按指示分段寫points、寫conclusion
5. 寫長文睇清楚一切嘅指示先寫:
留心咩 format、寫咩內容、讀者/語氣、提示,仲有冇咩特別要求:
- 會唔會限字數
- 有冇叫你用 own words 做 paraphrasing
- 使唔使quote sources
- 搵完 points 之後要點整理資料、分類、改寫文字等
6. 你寫既答案要 make sense,小心 spelling唔好寫左 D 連你自己都唔明甚至自己都覺得白痴既答案
7. 唔識串某d字唔好漏好佢寫下拼音,或者諗下有冇第二個近義字取代到或者再之後 check 下題目其他地方有冇果隻字本身係印左出黎
8. 小心 tense,小心 preposition,小心 's',最好聽既時候都小心呢樣野,有時 tense / 's' 係題目已暗示左俾你
9. 雖然我地唔預期大家嘅字好靚,但都要 marker 睇到至得,reader-friendly 好重要
10. 如果訊號接收好有問題,睇下四周圍同學會唔會有事先如果冇,而持續不斷都係咁差,要果斷去 special room因為接收問題而去 special room 唔會扣分但因為冇帶電芯 / earphone 先會如果大家都有事,就鎮定啲,聽到幾多就得幾多
今天繼續努力,明天決戰最重分嘅呢份卷!
大家衝埋去,我會繼續支持大家!
堅持下去,You mustn't quit!
加油!
Don’t look back; look forward!
Kenneth
12/4/2014 3:00pm
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過2萬的網紅siuyuenchin,也在其Youtube影片中提到,✅WhatsApp即時查詢: https://wa.me/85265886588 ✅直接網上報名: https://www.siuyuenchinese.com/hkjy01/bk_18327876.html ✅參觀上課網站: www.siuyuenchinese.com 課程推介: (1)...
speech格式 在 健吾 Facebook 八卦
各位,生成器也許已沒有用了。選管會一天就收到4500封電郵。看來,大家炸他電郵還是有點用的。
以下乃沈大師言為「內部AO提供範本」。的確是官話文章,請先仔細閱讀,才選擇是否發出電郵吧。
你還有5小時。
请广传,好人一生平安。
[#官方資訊] 早前分享了一位高級政務官朋友就《逃犯條例》爭議的感受,得到數千轉載,迴響十分熱烈,也有不少公務員私訊回應。本頁對象一直以黃藍以外的專業人士為主,雖然平日只分享國際視野資訊,但在關鍵時刻,也希望為一些平日對社會抽離的朋友,提供更多資訊參考。以下是我的另一位AO朋友擔心局勢惡化,希望以自己的方式真正為特區政府服務,因此以私人身份草擬的意見書,回應特區政府選舉管理委員會關於區議會選舉的官方諮詢,並使用了完美官僚理據、格式和文法,就DQ候選人提供了詳細意見。根據官方資訊,《逃犯條例》收到4500份意見書,其中3000份「贊成」,因此發出意見書並非毫無價值。這位AO表示,大家可以直接使用這格式,根據個人觀點加減內容直接電郵遞交,因為香港人大家都忙,這過程只需一分鐘,應該最符合成本效益。截止日期是7月10日或之前,請廣傳,好人一生平安。
10 July 2019
Chairman
Electoral Affairs Commission (EAC)
By Email: eacenq@eac.hk
Dear Chairman,
Public consultation on District Council Election proposed guidelines
I write to object to Chapter 3 of the Proposed Guidelines, as it gives Government an unjust, unfair, and unchecked power to disqualify any candidate during the nomination period by reason of Government’s own political motives.
Chapter 3.1 of the Proposed Guidelines says that : “Under the law, the validity of a candidate’s nomination is to be determined by the Returning Officer (RO). The EAC is neither empowered nor involved in the making of such decision and would not provide any advice on the decision made by the RO”.
Chapter 3.9(b) of the Proposed Guidelines describes the requirement by which a candidate must declare (through signing a “Confirmation Form” by the EAC) that he would uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to the HKSAR.
It is totally unclear whether a Confirmation Form duly signed by a candidate is itself sufficient to discharge the candidate’s duty to declare his willingness to uphold the Basic Law and pledge allegiance to the HKSAR when he is elected to the office.
Previous elections showed that an RO, who was a civil servant (pitched at Administrative Officer Staff Grade C / District Officer) appointed to the role of RO prior to the election, could make subjective and arbitrary judgment about a candidate’s state of mind and political orientation, with selective reference to some or a few past writings, speeches, statements, expression of opinions, posts in social media platforms in relation to the candidate, instead of merely looking at a Confirmation Form duly signed.
I find it outrageous to see that Ms. Anne Teng, then District Officer (Eastern) appointed to the role of RO in a legislative council by-election last year, could refuse to acknowledge a confirmation form signed by Miss Agnes Chow Ting and disqualify her, citing absurd and arbitrary reasons with reference to some of Miss Chow’s previous remarks or those of her political party, and without giving Miss Chow a fair opportunity to respond to those reasons uttered unreasonably by the RO.
The Proposed Guidelines shows that the EAC has failed its duty to introduce any additional safeguard or measures to plug this unreasonable, unlawful and unconstitutional loophole, which may still be freely exploited by any RO in the next election driven by bad faith and political motive.
It is unacceptable that the EAC could confess that it is “neither empowered nor involved in the making of such decision and would not provide any advice on the decision made by the RO” (Chapter 3.1). I question how the EAC can still “ensure that an election is conducted openly, fairly and honestly at all times” – its statutory duty enshrined in the Electoral Affairs Commission Ordinance - when it is not involved in scrutinising or monitoring the exercise of an RO’s power in disqualifying any candidate at the RO’s own political preference.
The Guidelines did not describe in detail how an RO could, on his or her own, research during the short nomination period the political belief and past sayings of any candidate. The Guidelines are also silent as to whether the RO would have received biased or secret advice from any agency such as Department of Justice, Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, Home Affairs Department, Information Services Department, etc., which may have compiled a detailed recollection of a candidate’s previous remarks in advance. It was suggested by some that such a compilation of speech or opinion records prepared by any agency other than the RO could have assisted the RO unlawfully in reaching a dangerous disqualification decision to deprive a candidate of the right to stand for the election.
I must remind the EAC that the right to stand for election is a fundamental right guaranteed under the Basic Law and the Hong Kong Bill of Rights. The United Nations Human Rights Committee’s General Comment 25 also states that “political opinion may not be used as a ground to deprive any person of the right to stand for election.”
I am disappointed to see that the proposed Guidelines have not offered anything substantive to protect a candidate from the RO’s unlawful interference in the election by disqualifying candidates he or she dislikes. The EAC must look at this carefully to see what it can do.
The current remedy about determining the lawfulness of an RO’s disqualification decision through an election petition to be adjudicated later by the court one or two years after the actual election is totally unsatisfactory, with the lapse of time which delays the timely delivery of a just outcome.
I stress that I object to Chapter 3 of the Proposed Guidelines in its entirety. I urge you to review all the processes described in Chapter 3 again and independently. In so doing, you must resist all political considerations wrongly dictated by the Chief Executive, Constitutional and Mainland Affairs Bureau, Department of Justice, or other government agency seeking to disturb the fairness and integrity of the forthcoming district council election.
Yours sincerely,
XXXX
更新:有熱心網友翻譯為中文版,並對原文作出修訂,請隨便share/修改:
10 July 2019
選舉管理委員會主席 鈞啓
選舉管理委員會主席鈞鑒: 關於區議會選舉活動建議指引公眾諮詢事宜
本人謹致函對建議指引第三章表達反對意見。建議指引第三章將賦予政府不公平、不公正以及不被箝制的權力,容許政府於提名階段取消香港市民的參選資格,以迎合政府自身的政治目的。
建議指引第三章第一部分(3.1)指:「根據法例,候選人的提名是否有效 ,完全是由選舉主任作出決定,選管會無權並一向沒有參與, 亦不會給予任何意見。」
建議指引第三章3.9(b) 要求候選人透過簽署選管會擬備的確認書表明他/她擁護《基本法》並保證對香港特別行政區效忠。
至於候選人是否能夠簽署確認書就能滿足擁護《基本法》並保證對香港特別行政區效忠的要求,建議指引對此完全沒有清晰交代。
過往選舉顯示,首長級丙級政務官/民政事務專員級別的公務員於選舉前獲委任為選舉主任,便能夠就候選人的思緒及政治取向作出主觀且隨意獨斷的決定,並只需揀選候選人往日曾經發表的文章、言論、宣言、意見表達、社交媒體帖文以及社交媒體專頁發佈關於對候選人的帖文穿鑿附會,當作輔證,而非僅以候選人是否有簽署確認書為單獨基礎作判斷。
去年立法會補選,時任東區民政事務專員鄧如欣獲委任為選舉主任,居然拒絕周庭小姐簽署的確認書,以周庭小姐及其所屬政黨昔日的言論去佐證選舉主任荒唐的理由,去褫奪周庭小姐的參選資格,並且沒有給予周庭小姐公平機會回應選舉主任的無理指控,實在令人憤慨。
由建議指引可見,選舉管理委員會並無引入任何措施或保障,去堵塞上述不合理、不合法、不合憲的漏洞。今後選舉主任依然可以使用此漏洞,依據其個人的政治目的或理念,惡意褫奪任何香港市民的參選資格。
選舉管理委員會於第三章第一部分(3.1)指:「根據法例,候選人的提名是否有效 ,完全是由選舉主任作出決定,選管會無權並一向沒有參與, 亦不會給予任何意見。」此點完全不可接受。當選舉管理委員會對選舉主任按其個人政治取向褫奪候選人參選資格的權力不作任何箝制、監察或審查, 又能如何履行其法定職責,「確保在香港舉行的選舉是以公開、公平和誠實的方式進行」呢?
建議指引並無對選舉主任如何可於短促的提名期內研究並審查任何候選人的政治理念及昔日言論有任何著墨。 建議指引亦未有論及選舉主任會否收到其他機構的秘密意見或者偏頗意見。上述的其他機構,例如律政司、內地及政制事務局、民政事務總署或政府新聞處等,可能預先詳細記錄相關候選人的昔日言論。據悉,上述由第三方準備的詳細記錄可能不合法地導致選舉主任作出褫奪候選人選舉資格的危險決定。
本人必須提醒選舉管理委員會,被選舉權是獲香港基本法及香港人權法案保障的基本權利。聯合國人權事務委員會第25號一般性意見亦指出:「不得以政治見解為由剝奪任何人參加競選的權利。」
本人對建議指引並未就保障候選人不被選舉主任按其個人喜惡褫奪資格,防止選舉主任非法干預選舉採取任何措施深感失望。選舉管理委員會必須詳細檢視自己對上述問題有何解決方法。
就選舉主任褫奪參選資格的合法性,目前透過選舉呈請,並於選舉完結一兩年後由法庭裁決的安排實在強差人意。當中所耗的時間令公義遲來。
本人對建議指引第三章完全反對。本人懇求主席重新並獨立審視第三章所包含的所有程序。在重新審視的時候,懇請閣下撇除並抗拒所有政治考量,尤其是來自行政長官、政制及事務內地局、律政司及其他政府機構企圖干預未來區議會選舉的誠信和公平性的政治考量。
敬祝 鈞安 XXXXXXXX 敬上
2019年7月9日
speech格式 在 遵理學校 Kenneth Lau Facebook 八卦
Day -7
Paper 3 (Listening and Integrated Skills) 提示:
策略:先攻 Part B,後溫 Part A
1.1 盡量一邊溫習,一邊練習。Paper 3 一卷不可能只溫習筆記。尤其有些同學過去一個月沒有聽過任何 Listening,必須讓腦子充滿英文,並再次熟習 voice talents 的聲線,甚至留意答案與非答案位置的語速和語調。最後一星期,必須有最少兩天的上午考試時間聽一聽考試的聲帶。
1.2 練習材料:如果有任何 DSE past papers(竟然)還沒有完成,務必完成。其次可操練 mock papers。建議留一份於考完 Papers 1 & 2 之後做。如果想操練在 DF 找資料、整合資料等技巧,也可做 UE Practical Skills(記住,當年 Practical Skills 沒有任何聲帶的)。
1.3 所有我 team 製作的 Mock Papers(不論是 Regular / All-round Intensive / Final Hit 課程)已上載,要下載的話,請到 www.kennethlau.com 的頁面下載(不是學校網站)。如遇下載問題 / 找不到某 file,請於辦公時間打電話至遵理技術部查詢(在登入的主頁及筆記已列有號碼)。
2.1 先主力溫習 Part B,緊記溫習在準備時間應該要準備什麼東西。更要重溫在聆聽階段的 cue words 提示字眼。aim =?reason =?(好似我堂上咁 up 就好)
2.2 必須溫習找資料的步驟,包括整個過程的 steps、看指示頁堂上強調的 locators / 藍色+橙色、重覆=?
2.3 必須溫習整理在找 points 之後整理資料的技巧:分類、綜合、轉字(微調)、撮寫、轉 formal、數據表達。
2.4 要溫寫作時如何全取 Language、Organisation and Coherence、Appropriacy 的 9 分分數。我在 Ultimate Intensive Book U2(Regular 最後一堂)已詳細溫習。
2.5 略溫各格式的取分要點:Formal letter 的要求、Report 及 Proposal (Advanced Listening) 及 Speech 的分段、頭尾寫法。
3.1 之後再溫習 Part A。先溫習幾大題型:Form-filling、續寫句子題、Map / Plan、Flowchart、Speaker's attitude、Ranking (1-5)、Question formation、MC 的答題要求和準備方法。
3.2 到最後有時間才串常考的字。
R1a. 最後提醒同學,由於我的 whatsapp 及 FB inbox 問題太多,未來幾天,我主要回答考試策略問題、考試遇到困難的處理辦法及其他英文問題。
R1b. 如有關於 past papers 答案、我們製作的 mock papers / 練習題目需要查詢,集中使用 我團隊 whatsapp 兩個號碼,作為分流,提升效率。
大家加油,並協助 share 或 tag 給身邊的戰友。
speech格式 在 siuyuenchin Youtube 的評價
✅WhatsApp即時查詢:
https://wa.me/85265886588
✅直接網上報名:
https://www.siuyuenchinese.com/hkjy01/bk_18327876.html
✅參觀上課網站:
www.siuyuenchinese.com
課程推介:
(1)中六常規課程 首期$450 = 8小時 = 彩色筆記+贈書
(2)中四五常規課程 $450一期 = 6.5小時 = 厚裝筆記+贈書
(3)另有小五至小六、中一中二及中三等課程
▄▄▄▄ 全新網上補習形式 ▄▄▄▄
【 www.siuyuenchinese.com (上課網站) 】
【 65886588 WhatsApp (手機報名) 】
▄▄▄▄▄▄ 追蹤我們動向 ▄▄▄▄▄▄
✚ 網上補中文 www.siuyuenchinese.com
✚ WhatsApp報名 65886588
✚ Instagram:siuyuenchinese
✚ Youtube:siuyuenchin
✚ Facebook:蕭源中文
▶ (1) 隨時隨地 電腦 / IPad 24小時皆可上課
▶ (2) 每期$450約6-8小時 費用至抵 減輕負擔
▶ (3) 厚膠裝筆記 大量贈書 寄到屋企
▶ (4) 片段於2020年8月拍攝 內容至新 可多次翻睇
▄▄▄▄ 更多精彩片段 ▄▄▄▄
極速學識【始得西山宴遊記】!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VMJcwi3xqCQ
極速學識【六國論】!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TOb91pDCtjE
極速學識【念奴嬌】!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaWG4VbyNA0&t=170s
極速學識【師說】!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TUeoBEBvB4
作文必用五星靚字!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lrk1eUY28m8&t=1s
作文入題7武器!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t9u0rkD7VCw&t=12s
記敘文絕世好橋!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-831ueSLO-A&t=15s
寫議論文無例子點算?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WjjVFlFCtZk&t=13s
12篇範文應該點溫?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rf6q1e9mR0g
作文可否「視乎情況」?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r7flZkymeEc
卷三聆聽注意事項
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3aq-CoLnKww&t=1s
卷一閱讀卷應試策略
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-j8vyZKQPbQ&t=13s
又係五星作文靚字!
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XNzdv8y99GY&t=7s
綜合卷格式千祈咪錯
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zYbCcJeBew4&t=1s
【外景:火炭大排檔食小菜 講「記敘文」寫法】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=80py2RzvQeU
【外景:上水椒鹽豬柳雞蛋仔 講卷一最難題型】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7BMZCyWsP_E
【外景:食炸物 教你作文例子的運用】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LIBjzBpl8wY
【外景:食拉麵 教你作文扣題意識:何謂明扣、暗扣?】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N-oFz3bxmMs
【外景:瀑布蛋治 又關作文選題事?】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VM_-ONGaqmk
【卷一三式題、找答案的必殺技!】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FTIxIS3g_Wk
【網上補習課程外景拍攝】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=r6XY7vNm2Gg
【40度高溫下的岳陽樓】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X3bAo492Gtg
【中文口試駛唔駛「界題」?】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qCl2T3pNlBE
【中文口試引用「古語」會唔會出事?】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Obnpovu3VWU
【考口試點先算成功「扣題」?】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0tiJF6hInug
【十二篇範文駛唔駛背?點解?】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0N1nfOKS3Q8
【如何有效提升溫習效率?】
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=V45j4-3HqB4
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/31c6c/31c6c0929315e33b7eed111c0b9ceb4250f0d100" alt="post-title"
speech格式 在 PSD格式圖案和PNG圖片免費下載 - Pinterest 的八卦
Download free png of Cloud cartoon effect speech bubble design element by Ning about speech bubble, comic, comic png, comic bubble, and frame 2377055. ... <看更多>