morning coffee photography的八卦，PINTEREST、YOUTUBE和Yahoo名人娛樂都在討論

早安唷～ 在冰冷的早晨喝一杯熱拿鐵，大概是當下最溫暖的一件事了～

#WVerbierHotelResidences, #Verbier, #Bagnes, #Switzerland #韋爾比耶W酒店 #韋比爾 #巴涅 #瑞士

📷：@sennarelax
Original：https://www.instagram.com/p/BfVcBW7AkJQ/

IG搜尋：d57travel 🔍 ( 帶我去旅行IG )
IG看更多：https://www.instagram.com/d57travel/

#d57travel #帶我去旅行 #travel #旅行 #旅遊 #攝影 #photography #景點 #ScenicSpots #TouristAttraction #下雪 #雪景 #冬天 #纜車 #咖啡 #早晨 #Snowing #SnowScene #winter #CableCar #coffee #morning

【我要做KOL】有不少人都活在社交媒體裡

⭐相片和真實行徑截然不同
⭐別為了打卡忽略身邊人感受
#星期六隻眼閉

呃Like你去到幾盡？
為打卡出現的怪異行為
如果你身邊有個很喜歡影相打卡的另一半，你有時需要容忍他/她對影相的執著，連生活細節都要隻眼開隻眼閉。

．化完妝扮起床
早晨總是美好的，為了拍一張完美的起床照，特別早起一小時化妝，然後跳回床上自拍，只為po一張相及加一個#GoodMorning Hashtag。

．在床上吃豐盛早餐
酒店房落地大窗前的大床上，有個人捲著被單，正在享用放到滿床都是的早餐，主角要不正在呷咖啡就是拿著一份英文報紙在看，是不是很有畫面呢？

．滿枱都是食物
無論是在Cafe吃Brunch、去酒樓食點心、或是去酒店食Buffet，一定要等到全部餐點到齊，放好放滿整張枱，站高影幾張Flat lay，全枱人要獲得批准才可以開始吃。

．買英文書做裝飾
為咗突顯自己的文學修養，家中必備厚厚的英文書或英文雜誌，除了擺放在書櫃上當裝飾，拍食物時都可以作小道具。

．坐在懸崖看風景
行山活動大熱，一身運動裝束，坐在看似很危險的懸崖上，擺一個望眼欲穿的表情，你也有影過吧？

留言或按讚👍🏻支持一下我們吧！❤️ 歡迎 Follow 我們獲得更多養生資訊。

How far do you go with photos to win likes?
A list of awkward behaviors when checking-in on IG

If your significant other enjoys taking photos and checking-in on IG, sometimes you just have to tolerate their behavior, and even turn a blind eye to some of these habits.

．Put on makeup and return to bed to take a photo
Morning is the best time of the day. In order to take a nice photo, some people might wake up an hour earlier to do makeup, then get back into bed just to take a photo with #GoodMorning.

．Enjoy a sumptuous breakfast on bed
Laying on a large bed in a hotel room with a French window, a person may curl up under a cozy blanket with breakfast spread all over the bed. He or she is either enjoying a cup of coffee or reading an English daily. Isn’t it quite a nice view?

．Food everywhere
Whether the person is enjoying brunch in a cafe, dimsum in a restaurant, or buffet in a hotel, he or she will wait for all the dishes to arrive and arrange them properly for the photo. The person will then stand up high and take a flat lay shot. No one is allowed to touch the food unless he or she is satisfied with the photos.

．Buy English books as décor
In order to present a cultured image to the followers, the person will always have stacks of English books or magazines around the house. Besides placing them on the bookshelf as décor, he or she will use them as props for food photography.

．Staring into the distance by a cliff
Hiking seems to be trendy lately. Dressed in proper hiking gears, some people will sit by the edge of a seemingly dangerous cliff and stare into the distance. Have you taken a photo like this before?

Comment below or like 👍🏻 this post to support us. ❤️ Follow us for more healthy living tips.

#男 #女

根據計算，100萬人遊行隊伍要從維多利亞公園排到廣東；200萬人遊行則要排到泰國。

順道一提香港15～30歲人口約莫100出頭萬人。以照片人群幾乎都是此年齡帶來看，兩個數字都是明顯誇大太多了。

另一個可以參考的是1969年的Woodstock Music & Art Fair，幾天內湧進40萬人次，照片看起來也是滿山滿谷的人。（http://sites.psu.edu/…/upl…/sites/851/2013/01/Woodstock3.jpg）

當年40萬人次引發驚人的大塞車，幾乎花十幾個小時才逐漸清場。

而香港遊行清場速度明顯快得多。

順道一提，因此運動而認定「你的父母不愛你」的白痴論述也如同文化大革命時的「爹親娘親不如毛主席親」般開始出現：

https://www.facebook.com/SaluteToHKPolice/videos/350606498983830/UzpfSTUyNzM2NjA3MzoxMDE1NjMyMTM4NjY3MTA3NA/

EVERY MAJOR NEWS outlet in the world is reporting that two million people, well over a quarter of our population, joined a single protest.
.
It’s an astonishing thought that filled an enthusiastic old marcher like me with pride. Unfortunately, it’s almost certainly not true.
.
A march of two million people would fill a street that was 58 kilometers long, starting at Victoria Park in Hong Kong and ending in Tanglangshan Country Park in Guangdong, according to one standard crowd estimation technique.
.
If the two million of us stood in a queue, we’d stretch 914 kilometers (568 miles), from Victoria Park to Thailand. Even if all of us marched in a regiment 25 people abreast, our troop would stretch towards the Chinese border.
.
Yes, there was a very large number of us there. But getting key facts wrong helps nobody. Indeed, it could hurt the protesters more than anyone.
.
For math geeks only, here’s a discussion of the actual numbers that I hope will interest you whatever your political views.
.
.
DO NUMBERS MATTER?
.
People have repeatedly asked me to find out “the real number” of people at the recent mass rallies in Hong Kong.
.
I declined for an obvious reason: There was a huge number of us. What does it matter whether it was hundreds of thousands or a million? That’s not important.
.
But my critics pointed out that the word “million” is right at the top of almost every report about the marches. Clearly it IS important.
.
.
FIRST, THE SCIENCE
.
In the west, drone photography is analyzed to estimate crowd sizes.
.
This reporter apologizes for not having found a comprehensive database of drone images of the Hong Kong protests.
.
But we can still use related methods, such as density checks, crowd-flow data and impact assessments. Universities which have gathered Hong Kong protest march data using scientific methods include Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University.
.
.
DENSITY CHECKS
.
Figures gathered in the past by Hong Kong Polytechnic specialists using satellite photo analysis found a density level of one square meter per marcher. Modern analysis suggests this remains roughly accurate.
.
I know from experience that Hong Kong marches feature long periods of normal spacing (one square meter or one and half per person, walking) and shorter periods of tight spacing (half a square meter or less per person, mostly standing).
.
.
JOINERS AND SPEED
.
We need to include people who join halfway. In the past, a Hong Kong University analysis using visual counting methods cross-referenced with one-on-one interviews indicated that estimates should be boosted by 12% to accurately reflect late joiners. These days, we’re much more generous in estimating joiners.
.
As for speed, a Hong Kong Baptist University survey once found a passing rate of 4,000 marchers every ten minutes.
.
Videos of the recent rallies indicates that joiner numbers and stop-start progress were highly erratic and difficult to calculate with any degree of certainty.
.
.
DISTANCE MULTIPLIED BY DENSITY
.
But scientists have other tools. We know the walking distance between Victoria Park and Tamar Park is 2.9 kilometers. Although there was overspill, the bulk of the marchers went along Hennessy Road in Wan Chai, which is about 25 meters (or 82 feet) wide, and similar connected roads, some wider, some narrower.
.
Steve Doig, a specialist in crowd analysis approached by the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), analyzed an image of Hong Kong marchers to find a density level of 7,000 people in a 210-meter space. Although he emphasizes that crowd estimates are never an exact science, that figure means one million Hong Kong marchers would need a street 18.6 miles long – which is 29 kilometers.
.
Extrapolating these figures for the June 16 claim of two million marchers, you’d need a street 58 kilometers long.
.
Could this problem be explained away by the turnover rate of Hong Kong marchers, which likely allowed the main (three kilometer) route to be filled more than once?
.
The answer is yes, to some extent. But the crowd would have to be moving very fast to refill the space a great many times over in a single afternoon and evening. It wasn’t. While I can walk the distance from Victoria Park to Tamar in 41 minutes on a quiet holiday afternoon, doing the same thing during a march takes many hours.
.
More believable: There was a huge number of us, but not a million, and certainly not two million.
.
.
IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
.
A second, parallel way of analyzing the size of the crowd is to seek evidence of the effects of the marchers’ absence from their normal roles in society.
.
If we extract two million people out of a population of 7.4 million, many basic services would be severely affected while many others would grind to a complete halt.
.
Manpower-intensive sectors of society, such as transport, would be badly affected by mass absenteeism. Industries which do their main business on the weekends, such as retail, restaurants, hotels, tourism, coffee shops and so on would be hard hit. Round-the-clock operations such as hospitals and emergency services would be severely troubled, as would under-the-radar jobs such as infrastructure and utility maintenance.
.
There seems to be no evidence that any of that happened in Hong Kong.
.
.
HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS MESS?
.
To understand that, a bit of historical context is necessary.
.
In 2003, a very large number of us walked from Victoria Park to Central. The next day, newspapers gave several estimates of crowd size.
.
The differences were small. Academics said it was 350,000 plus. The police counted 466,000. The organizers, a group called the Civil Rights Front, rounded it up to 500,000.
.
No controversy there. But there was trouble ahead.
.
.
THINGS FALL APART
.
At a repeat march the following year, it was obvious to all of us that our numbers were far lower that the previous year. The people counting agreed: the academics said 194,000 and the police said 200,000.
.
But the Civil Rights Front insisted that there were MORE than the previous year’s march: 530,000 people.
.
The organizers lost credibility even with us, their own supporters. To this day, we all quote the 2003 figure as the high point of that period, ignoring their 2004 invention.
.
.
THE TRUTH COUNTS
.
The organizers had embarrassed the marchers. The following year several organizations decided to serve us better, with detailed, scientific counts.
.
After the 2005 march, the academics said the headcount was between 60,000 and 80,000 and the police said 63,000. Separate accounts by other independent groups agreed that it was below 100,000.
.
But the organizers? The Civil Rights Front came out with the awkward claim that it was a quarter of a million. Ouch. (This data is easily confirmed from multiple sources in newspaper archives.)
.
.
AN UNEXPECTED TWIST
.
But then came a twist. Some in the Western media chose to present ONLY the organizer’s “outlier” claim.
.
“Dressed in black and chanting ‘one man, one vote’, a quarter of a million people marched through Hong Kong yesterday,” said the Times of London in 2005.
.
“A quarter of a million protesters marched through Hong Kong yesterday to demand full democracy from their rulers in Beijing,” reported the UK Independent.
.
It became obvious that international media outlets were committed to emphasizing whichever claim made the Hong Kong government (and by extension, China) look as bad as possible. Accuracy was nowhere in the equation.
.
.
STRATEGICALLY CHOSEN
.
At universities in Hong Kong, there were passionate discussions about the apparent decision to pump up the numbers as a strategy, with the international media in mind. Activists saw two likely positive outcomes.
.
First, anyone who actually wanted the truth would choose a middle point as the “real” number: thus it was worth making the organizers’ number as high as possible. (The police could be presented as corrupt puppets of Beijing.)
.
Second, international reporters always favored the largest number, since it implicitly criticized China. Once the inflated figure was established in the Western media, it would become the generally accepted figure in all publications.
.
Both of the activists’ predictions turned out to be bang on target. In the following years, headcounts by social scientists and police were close or even impressively confirmed the other—but were ignored by the agenda-driven international media, who usually printed only the organizers’ claims.
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION
.
Skip this section unless you want additional examples to reinforce the point.
.
In 2011, researchers and police said that between 63,000 and 95,000 of us marched. Our delightfully imaginative organizers multiplied by four to claim there were 400,000 of us.
.
In 2012, researchers and police produced headcounts similar to the previous year: between 66,000 and 97,000. But the organizers claimed that it was 430,000. (These data can also be easily confirmed in any newspaper archive.)
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION TOO
.
Unless you’re interested in the police angle. Why are police figures seen as lower than others? On reviewing data, two points emerge.
.
First, police estimates rise and fall with those of independent researchers, suggesting that they function correctly: they are not invented. Many are slightly lower, but some match closely and others are slightly higher. This suggests that the police simply have a different counting method.
.
Second, police sources explain that live estimates of attendance are used for “effective deployment” of staff. The number of police assigned to work on the scene is a direct reflection of the number of marchers counted. Thus officers have strong motivation to avoid deliberately under-estimating numbers.
.
.
RECENT MASS RALLIES
.
Now back to the present: this hot, uncomfortable summer.
.
Academics put the 2019 June 9 rally at 199,500, and police at 240,000. Some people said the numbers should be raised or even doubled to reflect late joiners or people walking on parallel roads. Taking the most generous view, this gave us total estimates of 400,000 to 480,000.
.
But the organizers, God bless them, claimed that 1.03 million marched: this was four times the researchers’ conservative view and more than double the generous view.
.
The addition of the “.03m” caused a bit of mirth among social scientists. Even an academic writing in the rabidly pro-activist Hong Kong Free Press struggled to accept it. “Undoubtedly, the anti-amendment group added the extra .03 onto the exact one million figure in order to give their estimate a veneer of accuracy,” wrote Paul Stapleton.
.
.
MIND-BOGGLING ESTIMATE
.
But the vast majority of international media and social media printed ONLY the organizers’ eyebrow-raising claim of a million plus—and their version soon fed back into the system and because the “accepted” number. (Some mentioned other estimates in early reports and then dropped them.)
.
The same process was repeated for the following Sunday, June 16, when the organizers’ frankly unbelievable claim of “about two million” was taken as gospel in the majority of international media.
.
“Two million people in Hong Kong protest China's growing influence,” reported Fox News.
.
“A record two million people – over a quarter of the city’s population” joined the protest, said the Guardian this morning.
.
“Hong Kong leader apologizes as TWO MILLION take to the streets,” said the Sun newspaper in the UK.
.
Friends, colleagues, fellow journalists—what happened to fact-checking? What happened to healthy skepticism? What happened to attempts at balance?
.
.
CONCLUSIONS?
.
I offer none. I prefer that you do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This is just a rough overview of the scientific and historical data by a single old-school citizen-journalist working in a university coffee shop.
.
I may well have made errors on individual data points, although the overall message, I hope, is clear.
.
Hong Kong people like to march.
.
We deserve better data.
.
We need better journalism. Easily debunked claims like “more than a quarter of the population hit the streets” help nobody.
.
International media, your hostile agendas are showing. Raise your game.
.
Organizers, stop working against the scientists and start working with them.
.
Hong Kong people value truth.
.
We’re not stupid. (And we’re not scared of math!)

A hidden gem in Macau with must try traditional Chinese street food breakfast.

Check out Rawell's Channel for more Macau videos!
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC1lpLGn4zsyaqgwYOmvYupg

Breakfast is my favorite meal of the day and here in this secret street food morning market you can find great authentic, local Chinese street food. Make sure to come early because many of these street food stalls close early.

Macau is home to lots of secret street food that are super delicious and a must eat when in Macau. If you are looking for a local breakfast or a street food style breakfast then I really recommend these two places we explored.

This street market is also perfect for morning because it is near a great coffee cafe so you can fuel up on your street food adventure.

Thanks for watching this street food breakfast video, if you would like to see more videos on Macau food make sure to let us know!

澳門其中的一顆瑰寶必須去品嚐嘗的，就是傳統中式街頭早餐。

早餐是我每天最喜歡的一餐，在這個神秘的街頭早餐市場裡，你可以找到優質的地道中式小吃。但要早點來，因為這些街頭小食攤檔有許多很早就關門。

澳門擁有許多超級美味的街頭小食，在澳門必吃。如果你正尋找澳門早餐或街頭美味的早餐，我推薦我們將要探索的這兩個地方。

這個街頭市場也非常適合早上，因為它在一個很棒的咖啡廳附近，因此你可以為街頭美食大冒險加油。

感謝收看這集街頭早餐視頻，如果你想收看更多有關澳門美食的視頻，請告知我們！
-
#macau #streetfood #travelvlog

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄? CHECK US OUT?▄▄▄▄▄▄▄

? - SUBSCRIBE:
https://www.youtube.com/user/SHOOTANDCHOP

? - FOLLOW US:
www.instagram.com/shootandchop

? - LIKE US:
www.facebook.com/shootandchop

▄▄▄▄▄▄▄? More Videos ?▄▄▄▄▄▄▄

? - MACAU TRAVEL VLOG GUIDE | STREET PHOTOGRAPHY MISSION | 澳門旅遊VLOG指南 | 街頭攝影任務
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QlVQydefT2E&list=PLFlnaEqdPFk9uDfphPZDHMCwOTyHzQswR

? - MACAU'S HIDDEN CAFES AND THEIR AMAZING STORIES | 澳門神秘咖啡館和他們的了不起的故事
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TSU9WY_YMnU&list=PLFlnaEqdPFk9uDfphPZDHMCwOTyHzQswR&index=3

? - THE DELICIOUSLY RARE SNACKS OF MACAU! | 澳門令人愉快的稀有零食！
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nLlkJvSTlNk&list=PLFlnaEqdPFk9uDfphPZDHMCwOTyHzQswR&index=4