罰則太輕:人民個資,多麼不值錢!
今年2月份媒體報導有位淡水的員警,濫用警察資訊系統的資源,查詢前女友之現任男友車籍資料,帶著朋友前往居住地以鐵鎚砸了現任男友的車。
經我們辦公室爬梳過去的新聞,自2007年「M-Police行動警察」系統推出後,警員濫查、濫用個資案件層出不窮,像是濫查藝人、政界個資,也有謊稱臨檢濫查IG網友個資的,各種光怪陸離的個案持續發生。
我們進一步調查,看到「M-Police行動警察」可連結戶政、役政、交通、法務、勞動等政府50項政府資訊,規模非常巨大,涵蓋人民食衣住行所有面向的個資系統。
目前全國共有1萬5千多部M-Police裝置,隨時讓警察帶在身邊執勤,有4萬6千餘人可以登入M-Police使用,有權查詢人民資料、人臉辨識比對。
警政署有沒有進行資安管理呢? 警政署目前已訂定 《警察機關資通安全實施規定》、《警用行動電腦使用管理要點》、《警政日誌管理系統作業規定》、《雲端影像調閱系統作業規定》,但令人驚訝的是,這些規範中,員警濫查個資的懲處標準過輕,幾乎都只有申誡處分。
大家看圖片中畫線部分,連把行動電腦擅自借給非警察機關人員使用,都只輕輕的記申誡,連記警告都沒有;甚至「發生洩密或資訊系統遭受破壞」這樣的嚴重情事,也只給予「記過以下」的懲處!洩密了,還「捨不得記個小過」!懲處之輕顯示警政署過去並未正視員警濫用個資的嚴重性,也無法達到嚇阻效果!人民個資,多麼不值錢!
個資保護也是國家安全的一環,不可等閒視之。今天我在質詢台上特別提案要求警政署必須重視,我要求他們二個月內完成相關資安稽核報告,並對不當濫查個資之防範研擬周全有效的管制措施!
為人民個資把關,我不會鬆懈!
質詢影音
https://youtu.be/soT_psLqy9w
「m police濫用」的推薦目錄:
- 關於m police濫用 在 管碧玲 (kuanbiling) Facebook
- 關於m police濫用 在 我的紫袍夢-3年9月的檢察官日誌 Facebook
- 關於m police濫用 在 Dr. Ray 的急症室迎送生涯 Facebook
- 關於m police濫用 在 [新聞] 想知BMW是不是他的!女警用M-Police查個資 - PTT 的評價
- 關於m police濫用 在 [新聞] M-Police兩大功能下線前警官透露:有人拿去亂來 - Mo PTT 的評價
- 關於m police濫用 在 [新聞] 用M-Police打賭嘻鬧猜女子年齡高雄4警被 的評價
- 關於m police濫用 在 [問卦] 有沒有M Police 人臉辨識系統的八卦? - PTT Web 的評價
- 關於m police濫用 在 M-Police人臉辨識侵權之虞? 警政署停用|華視新聞20211227 的評價
m police濫用 在 我的紫袍夢-3年9月的檢察官日誌 Facebook 八卦
台灣高雄獨特的「警察受理遺失物報案事件特殊處理方式」:
感謝高雄這位 #五年記了1500支嘉獎 的大巡佐,
這次彷彿身兼綜藝節目主持人,拍片為我們示範
警詢「人別詢問」、「全程錄音錄影」、以及警用資訊查詢系統的特殊使用方式:
1. 人別詢問:派出所內對賭,#賭報案人年齡,還差點賭三圍
2. 全程錄音錄影:以綜藝節目方式錄影,#上傳警察群組
3. 警用資訊查詢系統使用方式:遞交 #警用行動電腦 M-Police供民眾自行輸入個資,藉此來揭曉對賭輸贏
4. 在民眾與影片前自誇「#巡佐不是幹假的,#閱人無數。」
聽說竟然還有在醬缸中不覺得臭的警職人員跟著叫屈:「處罰太重」。
一個值班幹部帶頭濫用警用查詢系統玩這種遊戲,只有記過/申誡調職,處罰叫重嗎?
只好幫忙分享這位「閱人無數」的巡佐對賭成功的新聞,
讓各路具有實務經驗的專家來判斷:這種受理報案的程序是否尋常?
------
圖片底圖擷取自新聞:https://bit.ly/3tIs78I
「3分20秒的影片中,警員開頭就說『我們來猜報案者的年齡』,還用500元當賭注,差距最大的必須請吃消夜,員警後來竟拿出M-Police警用行動電腦企圖進一步確認年紀,過程中還有人將行徑合理化『她來報遺失物,我們來查她的身分,OK吧?』猜中28歲後,對著鏡頭開心比出讚的手勢,自誇『巡佐不是幹假的,閱人無數。』」
m police濫用 在 Dr. Ray 的急症室迎送生涯 Facebook 八卦
醫者有社會責任去保障公眾健康,我們認為梁卓偉教授和陳家亮教授作為香港兩所醫學院院長責無旁貸。因此,我們呼籲所有醫護人員參與連署,懇請兩位院長履行社會使命發表聲明保障社會大眾的健康和人身安全。
連署連結: https://forms.gle/teMGNCiZPMYatVbh8
———————————————————————-
《致香港大學李嘉誠醫學院院長、中文大學醫學院院長的公開信》
梁教授、陳教授道鑒:
有鑑於在六月十二日、七月二日及二十一日,香港警察濫用武力以控制群眾。如此行徑實對公眾健康遺害無窮,我們一眾醫療人員對此極為關切。作為香港大學李嘉誠醫學院院長、中文大學醫學院院長,吾等懇請兩位院長細察香港警察控制群眾之手段,以保障公眾健康。
據多家本地及國際媒體報導,香港警察於六月十二日,發射多輪催淚彈、橡膠子彈及布袋彈,以驅散聚集在金鐘的示威者。報導提及,警方向示威者發射至少一百五十枚催淚彈,二十輪布袋彈以及數枚橡膠子彈,造成至少七十二人受傷。從多家媒體直播可見,橡膠子彈更直射一名教師眼球,創傷嚴重,對其視力之損害非同等閒。另外,警方亦曾以數枚催淚彈包抄示威者,堵塞其退路;而當示威者被逼退守至中信大廈,警方竟朝人群中央投以催淚彈,造成數以百計的市民受傷及呼吸困難,生死攸關,不容小覷。此外,警方向一名手無寸鐵的市民,近距離發射橡膠子彈,以致其下腹嚴重受傷,情況慘不忍睹。
據多份醫學期刊綜述──如《刺針》(Lancet)[1] 及英國醫學期刊(BMJ (Open))[2],橡膠子彈乃可致命武器。同時,橡膠子彈不易操控,準確性低,有引致重傷,乃至死亡之風險。多份期刊不約而同指出,橡膠子彈不適宜用於密集人群之管制。
然而,香港警察漠視上述已知風險,仍於七月二日及七月二十一日繼續使用此類武器。在七月二十一日,警察更於鄰近民居之地,向群眾發射多輪催淚彈及橡膠子彈,當中更殃及記者。此等武器之禍害影響深重,不單有損呼吸系統,更會導致燒傷、嚴重鈍物創傷及爆炸性創傷。據媒體報導,武器造成至少十四人受傷;更有市民懼於警方之搜捕行動,而未敢求醫,致使受傷數字難以估算。
人權醫療組織(Physicians for Human Rights)醫生哈爾(Dr Rohini Haar)在接受紐約時報訪問時指出,警方對市民使用不成比例的武力,實有濫用武力之嫌。早在二零一四年,潘冬平教授[3]亦對香港警察使用催淚氣體情況深表關注,擔心催淚氣體損害市民呼吸系統。可見,催淚彈、橡膠子彈及豆袋彈等武器危害不輕,對香港市民公眾健康的損害不容置疑。
兩大醫學學院一直致力培育杏林菁英,不遺餘力。一眾醫療人員亦謹承《希波克拉底誓詞》之教誨,不論病患身份職要,一直為全人類之福祉著想,嚴守不懈。學院循循善誘,吾等縷心刻骨。誓詞薪火相傳,代代不息;缺少對生命健康之尊重,醫療人員何以自立?故此,我們一眾醫療人員懇請院長,發表聲明,呼籲香港警察:
一、避免濫用催淚彈及任何類型子彈,以免導致人命傷亡及其他不可見之損傷。
二、在使用武力時,必須顧及市民安全,並保持專業克制。
醫療人員一直存仁心,行仁術;保護市民之健康,乃至生命,吾等責無旁貸。院長為學為醫,高風峻節,茍以吾等同心同德,捍衛市民之生命健康,必見杏林春暖。
謹祝
道安
一眾醫療人員謹上
———————————————————————
Dear Professor Leung and Professor Chan,
We are a group of healthcare professionals, some of us being also graduates from the Faculty of Medicine of the University of Hong Kong and the Chinese University of Hong Kong. We are writing to express our gravest concerns over the persistent and serious threats to the health of members of the public posed by weapons deployed in crowd control by the Hong Kong Police Force (HKPF) on 12 June, 2 July and 21 July. We hereby urge the Deans of the sole Faculties of Medicine in Hong Kong to take actions in censuring the HKPF and the Hong Kong Government against the serious health risks in their crowd-control tactics.
On 12 June, as reported by multiple local and international news agencies, the HKPF fired multiple rounds of tear gas, rubber bullets and bean-bag rounds to disperse protesters in Admiralty. Over 150 canisters of tear gas, 20 bean-bag rounds and several rubber bullets have admittedly been directed at protestors which resulted in at least 72 injuries. As evident in the live reports from various media sources, a teacher suffered traumatic ocular injury causing significant vision loss when his eye was hit by a rubber bullet; hundreds of citizens suffered various degrees of injuries and respiratory distress consequential upon the numerous tear gas canisters shot at Citic Tower in Admiralty where protesters were trapped in a life-threatening space filled with tear gas; an unarmed man sustained injury in his lower abdomen when a rubber bullet was directed at him in a short distance.
According to multiple studies and reviews from high impact factor medical journals, in particular the Lancet[1] and BMJ (Open)[2], rubber bullets can be lethal. Their notorious inaccuracy and risk of severe injury and death render them inappropriate and unsafe means of force in crowd control.
However, despite the known risks of these weapons, the HKPF tenaciously deployed them on citizens on 2 July and 21 July. On 21 July, 55 canisters of tear gas, 5 rubber bullet rounds and 24 sponge bullets were admittedly shot, some without immediate warning, at protestors and even at journalists notwithstanding the numerous residential buildings and citizens in the vicinity. The use of these weapons has left members of the public with at the very least, various types of injuries and further, burns, blunt force trauma and explosive injuries. 14 injuries have by far been reported where others did not present themselves to the hospital in fear of the risk of prosecution.
Dr Rohini Haar of Physicians for Human Rights had in a recent interview told the New York Times that the force used by the HKPF was disproportionate and excessive. In Hong Kong, Professor Ronnie Poon had as early as in 2014 expressed openly his earnest concern over both the short term and long term health risks in the use of tear gas in particular to one’s respiratory system when the HKPF first fired tear gas at Hong Kong citizens [3]. It is indisputable that these named weapons put the health of Hong Kong citizens at serious risks.
Doctors have striven to stand by the Hippocratic oath that they remain members of society, the identity of which comes before their profession, with special obligations to all fellow human beings. The two medical schools in Hong Kong have been established accordingly for the nurture of healthcare professionals to serve the public with benevolent hearts and minds. This is the time to honour our oath that human life should deserve the utmost respect and to maintain by all means such noble traditions of the medical profession.
We, as healthcare professionals, therefore implore the Deans of the only Faculties of Medicine in Hong Kong, in the service of humanity with conscience and dignity, to take the lead in safeguarding the public’s health and to issue a statement to urge the Hong Kong Police Force to:
(1) refrain from using tear gas and bullets in any form on protestors to prevent further bloodshed and severe non-reversible injuries; and
(2) exercise due restraint over the use of force when handling protests and at all times, put the safety of Hong Kong citizens at the highest priority.
Regards,
A group of healthcare professionals
———————————————————
Healthcare professionals have a social responsibility to safeguard the health of members of the public. We believe that, as Deans of the faculties of medicine in Hong Kong, Professor Leung and Professor Chan bear a paramount obligation in this regard. We appeal to all healthcare professionals to join us in this petition to urge the deans to issue a statement to honour their obligation to defend the public from health risks.
—————————————————————
Petition Link: https://forms.gle/teMGNCiZPMYatVbh8
——————————
參考資料/References
[1] Mahajna, A., Aboud, N., Harbaji, I., Agbaria, A., Lankovsky, Z., Michaelson, M., . . . Krausz, M. M. (2002). Blunt and penetrating injuries caused by rubber bullets during the Israeli-Arab conflict in October, 2000: A retrospective study. The Lancet, 359(9320), 1795-1800. doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(02)08708-1
[2] Haar, R. J., Iacopino, V., Ranadive, N., Dandu, M., & Weiser, S. D. (2017, December 01). Death, injury and disability from kinetic impact projectiles in crowd-control settings: A systematic review
[3] Professor Ronnie Poon Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/138599119760/posts/10152753050039761?s=1014598371&sfns=mo
—————————————————————
m police濫用 在 [新聞] M-Police兩大功能下線前警官透露:有人拿去亂來 - Mo PTT 的八卦
前警官陳立說,因為今年4月間,高雄市有分局發生巡佐濫用「M-Police」的狀況,所以警政署修訂使用M-Police查詢身分證影像資料規定,其中在今年7月修正 ... ... <看更多>
m police濫用 在 [新聞] 用M-Police打賭嘻鬧猜女子年齡高雄4警被 的八卦
完整新聞標題:用M-Police打賭嘻鬧猜女子年齡高雄4警被記過、所長申誡4. ... 40 F 推SidMax: 不意外啦那台根本就是被濫用 05/12 09:20. ... <看更多>
m police濫用 在 [新聞] 想知BMW是不是他的!女警用M-Police查個資 - PTT 的八卦
社會中心/台北報導台北市21歲女警花遭網友指控介入感情,不僅一次和5個男生同時交往,還濫用公權力調查個資,引發外界軒然大波。事後警方調查,女警確實曾用M-Police ... <看更多>