ใครเป็นเจ้าของยูเนี่ยน มอลล์? /โดย ลงทุนแมน
หลังจากที่ประเทศไทยคลายล็อกดาวน์
ห้างสรรพสินค้าก็ได้เริ่มกลับมาคึกคักอีกครั้ง
โดยหนึ่งในห้างที่กลับมาคึกคักโดยเฉพาะในหมู่วัยรุ่น...
Continue ReadingWho owns a union mall? / By Investing Man
After Thailand loosen the lockdown
Malls are starting to get back up
By one of the back up malls, especially among teenagers.
It's Union Mall. Fashion source in the heart of five. Ladprao separate.
And do we ever wonder if
Who owns Union Mall
And what's the highlight of this mall?
Invest man will tell you about it.
╔═══════════╗
Experience new technology from Startup Thai Blockdit
Blockdit is a platform of source of thinkers
At the moment, update the situation in the video article form.
Including podcasts to listen on the go.
Try it out at Blockdit.com/download
╚═══════════╝
First, let's get to know the owner of Union Mall.
In fact, Union Mall is a Sirichit family business.
Now I have run a business to the 2th generation of heirs with executives.
Being the eldest daughter of the family is Khun Jiraphat Sirichit
Many people may not be familiar yet. Sirichit family.
But seriously, this family is another pioneer of the department store business in Thailand.
At the mall, it's ′′ Bonanza Mall ′′ located on the welding way.
Between Siam Square and Mobunnong.
If anyone has visited Siam in the past.
Bonanza Mall is one of the center of popular fashion stores.
For teenagers in that neighborhood and also the source of selling student uniforms.
Interesting thing is that the BONANSA MALL business model will break the rental area into small boot for small shops instead of modeling large stores like other malls.
The idea was originally from Mr. Prachaphati, your father Jiraphat, traveling to Singapore and Hong Kong, finding that the rental price in the trade would be more expensive, which would make the small rental area more likely to be popular in the next time.
This is how the Sirichit family brings such observation to the business until it becomes Bonanza Mall.
Afterwards, Mr. Jiraphatsirichit, the oldest daughter has graduated from the USA.
She started helping out at Bonanza Mall for a while.
Until the days have passed until the 2540 s or the Tom Yum Kung Economy crisis that has become a major disaster for many businesses in Thailand.
But for the Sirichit family, they decided to start planning a business expansion on a family land in five intersection. Latrun since then.
Because of opportunity and anticipation, this space has enough potential to become future innovation.
9 years later, what was planned successfully became a Union Mall with DNA and business experience from Bonanza Mall that eventually shuts itself down from returning the area to the area. Chulalongkorn
Union Mall has become a department store for minor stores similar to Bonanza, but has a bigger scale, more versatile and is a rental area for over 1,500 minor stores.
Do you know how much income the Union Mall is?
If we refer to the main income from the Department of Business Development, the latest trade.
Siam Chatuchak Co Ltd. The owner of Union Mall.
Year 2559 Income 474 million baht, profit 126 million baht.
Year 2560 Income 478 million baht, profit 184 million baht.
Year 2561 Income 494 million baht, profit 108 million baht.
From the result, it shows that even Union Mall is in a department store business.
Many people are saying that they will get displays from online channel.
This department store also has consistent income and produces good profits all the time.
The obvious thing from this year's crisis is.
After Thailand started loosing the lockdown.
Union Mall is also a shopping source of Thai teenagers.
Upbeat and seemingly a quick recovery
This is probably because Union Mall is unique.
There is an unacceptable customer group from the mall in the same neighborhood.
But we can't deny that department store business is one of the businesses facing challenges from Ecommerce business.
That's changing our behaviour to trading through a smartphone screen instead of a storefront.
We have to keep up with the uniqueness of Union Mall.
How to face this challenge and how to adapt
However, this has given us some ideas.
Sometimes business ideas can happen from traveling experiences as well.
As the Sirichit family finds out
Business model, small boot rental area.
Will be available at shops in Thailand
So it's really like this with Bonanza and Union Mall..
╔═══════════╗
Experience new technology from Startup Thai Blockdit
Blockdit is a platform of source of thinkers
At the moment, update the situation in the video article form.
Including podcasts to listen on the go.
Try it out at Blockdit.com/download
╚═══════════╝
Follow the investment man at
Website - longtunman.com
Blockdit-@[113397052526245:274: lngthun mæn]
Facebook-facebook.com/longtunman
Twitter - twitter.com/longtunman
Instagram-instagram.com/longtunman
Line - page.line.me/longtunman
YouTube - youtube.com/longtunman
References
- Corporate official website
- Department of Business Development, Trade
-Manager Online
- newtvTranslated
同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過3萬的網紅POPA Channel,也在其Youtube影片中提到,小朋友,最喜歡做一些大人眼中很危險的事情。他們會爬高爬低,愈爬得高,就愈興奮。他們又喜歡踩滑板車,踩得非常快,甚至從斜坡衝下來,追求那種刺激快感。原來,小朋友喜歡追求刺激的心理,在他們成長發展中,有一個非常重要的功能。 2011年挪威心理學家 Ellen Sandseter發表研究報告,嘗試解釋「...
behaviour model 在 Goodbye HK, Hello UK Facebook 八卦
英國最(扮)中立嘅第一大報《The Times》社論呀喂!
「係時候一齊同佢割蓆喇!」
"The Times view on Western reliance on an aggresive China: Conscious Decoupling"
(我地對於西方國家依賴一個咁有挑釁性國家嘅睇法:一齊割蓆啦!)
泰晤士報嘅Leading Article社論,係代表整份報紙嘅立場同姿態,今次真係除咗條呔教人做爛仔。首先緊係話美帝同中國依家嘅關係,軍事上中國响台灣同南海嘅動靜,而北京繼續欺凌嗰啲批評佢地嘅國家(Beijing continues to bully countries that criticise its authoritarian model),例如澳洲咁啦。
而美帝亦對盟友施壓,近期就迫以色列唔好同中國行得咁埋,所以啱啱以色列就取消咗一個同唔知係咪白手套嘅香港企業嘅合作。嗱,泰晤士報又提返自己政府華為單嘢,「美帝話咗你好耐喇,依家中國咁激,不如襯呢個時候摵甩佢啦!」(the government should review this decision in the light of China’s increasingly aggressive behaviour)。
不過講到咁其實係有務實嘅一面(一步步黎...),佢地指出今時今日嘅所謂冷戰比較以前西方社會同蘇聯嘅情況唔同。當時兩邊嘅商業瓜葛少到近乎零,但係依家中國係被養到成為全世界最大嘅生產出口國,咁點割呢?
//Yet the reality is that for all the talk of decoupling, no country, including the US, can afford to turn its back on China.//
(現實係就算美帝都唔係話摵就摵得甩。)
咁就先由最核心嘅嘢入手,例如重要醫藥同電子零件,要盟友之間揾方法互補,準備好一齊可以帶領第四次工業革命(ensure that the West regains leadership in the next stage of the fourth industrial revolution.)。
//Meanwhile Britain should not be afraid to counter Chinese assertiveness by using its own substantial aid budget to support countries that share its values. It may be that this crisis will go down as a significant moment in the 21st century as China challenges the US for global hegemony. The best way to counter that is for the West to stand firm and refuse to be bullied.//
(而英國唔應該驚佢有牙,用自己嘅財政資源去支持有同樣價值觀嘅國家。响廿一世紀,美帝嘅霸權緊係有機會被挑戰嘅,不過唯一嘅抗衡方法,就係西方社會齊心對啲無賴企硬。)
#扮中立都講到咁
#除咗條呔都係爛仔
原文:
《The Times》
https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/comment/the-times-view-on-western-reliance-on-an-aggresive-china-conscious-decoupling-xql8vdzjs
*********************************
支持Patreon係本Page嘅支柱:
https://www.patreon.com/goodbyehkhellouk
YouTube Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/c/GoodbyeHKHelloUK
*********************************
behaviour model 在 黃傑龍 Simon - 窮富翁 好人好事 Facebook 八卦
以下係我已經喺WhatsApp收咗三次嘅前高等法院英女王御用大律師,Henry Litton (列顕倫)* QC ;給香港市民的一封信:~ (裏便了無新意, 不過有兩個好處. 1) 洋人寫係唔同啲, 仲要係有名望嘅大法官, 特別有說服力 2)啲英文寫得好靚, 仲有中文翻譯可以學習英文。
Henry Litton (列顕倫)* QC was the Judge of the highest Court in Hong Kong. He retired in 2015.
英女皇御用大律師列顕倫(亨利·利頓)QC,是香港最高法院的法官。他於2015年退休。
The following is what he’s written...
以下是他寫的。
There are few certainties in life. One of them is this: The common law system underpinning Hong Kong’s “core values” is destined to expire in 27 years’ time. The One Country Two Systems formula was designed to last for 50 years and no more. Hence Article 5 of the Basic Law. There is no mechanism in the Basic Law for the system to continue beyond 30 June 2047.
生活中很少有確定性。其中之一是:支撐香港“核心價值”的普通法制度將在27年後失效。一國兩制方案的設計時限是50年,之後,再也沒有了。因此,“基本法”第五條清楚指出。2047年6月30日以後,“基本法”中沒有任何機制讓這制度繼續下去。
All the calls for Freedom, Democracy etc have no meaning if the common law crumbles.
如果普通法崩潰,所有要求“自由、民主”等的呼籲都是沒有意義。
If the protesters truly value their professed aims, *their focus should be on demonstrating to Beijing and to the rest of the world that the One Country Two Systems formula works, and to promote an atmosphere in which Beijing feels comfortable with the system – and when the time comes, to extend the Basic Law for another 50 years, 100 years*. Then liberal democratic norms and values might have a chance to flourish.
如果抗議者真的誠心誠意的重視他們宣稱的目標,*他們的重點、重心,應該是向北京和世界其他地方展示“一國兩制”的方案是有效的,並推展“一國兩制”的成功實施。令北京對這一制度感到寛心舒泰的環境下 - 當時機成熟時,說服北京將“基本法”再延長50年,100年*。那麼,自由、民主的模式、準則和價值觀還可能有延續蓬勃、活躍的機會。
Crunch time is not 27 years away. It is just round the corner. For Hong Kong to continue as one of the world’s greatest financial and trading centres, planning for the future must necessarily look 20 -30 years ahead. So the hard question will soon be asked: is the common law system to continue beyond June 2047 ? The answer lies in Beijing and nowhere else.
擔心不安的時刻不是27年後的事。就在拐角處。要使香港繼續成為世界上最大的金融和貿易中心之一,對未來的規劃必須著眼於未來20-30年。因此,我們很快便會提出一個棘手的問題:普通法制度是否會延續至2047年6月以後?答案就在北京,而不是其他任何地方。
The last time this issue arose – back in 1982 – Hong Kong had the backing of Great Britain. This time Hong Kong stands alone. And, up to this point, Hong Kong has demonstrated for all the world to see that the One Country Two Systems formula is extremely fragile: and, if the unrest continues, it would surely fracture beyond any hope of recall.
回顧1982年,上一次被問到這個問題的時候,當時香港是得到了大英帝國的支持。而這一次,香港只能孤掌難鳴。到目前為止,香港已經向全世界展示了“一國兩制”這方案是極其脆弱的:如果動亂繼續下去,它肯定會褫奪,無望地被撤銷。
It is beyond the power of the Hong Kong SAR government to devise the governing model for the future. Pressing the Hong Kong government to promote greater democracy is futile. Rightly or wrongly, that power lies in Beijing. Nowhere else. Hong Kong enjoys freedoms found nowhere else in China. To think that unlawful assemblies and demonstrations, and violence in the streets, would soften Beijing’s attitude towards Hong Kong is absurd. Common sense suggests it would have the opposite effect.
為未來設計治理模式,是超出了香港特別行政區政府的權力範圍。要迫使香港政府促進更大的民主是徒勞的。不管是你喜歡也好。不喜歡也好。權力就是在北京。沒有別的地方了。香港現在享有中國其他地方沒有的自由。認為非法集會示威和街頭暴力會軟化北京的對香港的態度是荒謬的。常識表明,它只會產生相反的效果。
But there are deep social issues which the SAR government can redress, having regard in particular to the huge foreign currency reserves it holds:USD425 billion – by far the largest in the world, enough to guarantee public servants’ pensions hundreds of times over. And yet Hong Kong’s social services are crumbling, hospitals are understaffed, public education is poor, teachers are ill-paid, young people cannot afford to rent even the most substandard apartment, the gap between rich and poor is ever-widening.
但是,有一些深層次的社會問題是特區政府可以解決的,特別是考慮到特區政府擁有世界上最龐大的外匯儲備:4,250億美元 - 是政府公務員的長俸所需要的保證金額的數以百倍。然而,香港的社會服務卻每況愈下,醫院人手不足,全民所需的教育不論在質素及資源都極差,教師薪酬偏低。年輕人怎都難以負擔租用即使是最不合標準的居所,社會上,貧富差距在不斷拉大。
The laissez-faire policy of the colonial government has been carried to extremes by the SAR government in the past 20-odd years. The rich have prospered in the meanwhile whilst the bulk of the people suffered. The influx of Mainlanders under the One-Way Permit system has caused great strain on all services. The people’s needs have been neglected. The young see little prospect of a fulfilling future and even university graduates find difficulty in meaningful employment.
大英帝國殖民地政府的自由放任政策在過去二十多年來一直被特區政府極端化。與此同時,大多數富人們卻在此期間更加繁榮昌盛、更加富裕起來,而相反普通市民却受苦了。在單程證制度下,內地人士大量湧入,對所有服務造成更大壓力。市民的需求、需要被忽視。年輕人看不出有向上游、向上流的任何富圖的希望。甚至大學畢業生也很難找到有合識、合意的工作。
These, I suggest, are the deep-seated ills which sustain the fire of discontent in the wider community, and bring hundreds of thousands to march in the streets. These are not matters which a commission of inquiry can resolve.
我認為,這些水深火熱的社會問題及弊病,這些憤懣之火已經廣泛地蔓延在整個社會,並促使數以十萬人走上街頭。這些都不是一個所謂諮詢委員會可以解決。
The media here is full of Hong Kong stories, and of course footage of the riotous behaviour on the streets: what empty slogans, meaningless rhetoric the protesters display ……….In watching these events I am reminded of the prayer attributed to Saint Francis:
今天的媒體充斥著不同形式的香港事件,當然有街頭暴力行為的鏡頭:抗議者們展示的空洞口號和毫無意義的粗言穢語。…當我在觀看這些事件時,‘我想起聖弗朗西斯的禱告:
Pray God give me the courage to change the things I can change, the fortitude to bear the things I cannot change, and the wisdom to know the difference.
願上帝賜給我勇氣去改變我能改變的事情,給我勇氣去承受那些我無法改變的事情,給我智慧去分辨其中的黑白。
I arrive in Hong Kong Thursday 24 October, staying for one month.
我在今年的10月24日星期四抵達香港,逗留一個月。
As ever
如常,祝願香港
H
列顕倫
PS Please feel free to convey these observations to anyone you chose ………….They are *not confidential*.
歡迎隨時將我這些意見傳達給你所選擇的任何人.此文是*不保密的*。
behaviour model 在 POPA Channel Youtube 的評價
小朋友,最喜歡做一些大人眼中很危險的事情。他們會爬高爬低,愈爬得高,就愈興奮。他們又喜歡踩滑板車,踩得非常快,甚至從斜坡衝下來,追求那種刺激快感。原來,小朋友喜歡追求刺激的心理,在他們成長發展中,有一個非常重要的功能。
2011年挪威心理學家 Ellen Sandseter發表研究報告,嘗試解釋「風險活動」對兒童身心發展的影響。
根據Dr. Sandseter定義,「風險活動」是指一些可以給小朋友刺激快感,但同時又存在受傷風險的活動。基本上可分為六大類:
爬高 (play with great heights)
速度活動 (play with high speed)
玩弄危險工具 (play with dangerous tools)
危險環境附近活動 (play near dangerous elements)
玩打交 (rough-and-tumble play)
玩走失/消失 (disappear/get lost)
Dr. Sandseter的主張是,小孩年幼時,對很多事物都懷有恐懼之心,例如畏高,害怕陌生人等。這其實是小朋友的天性本能,用來保護他們,因為當時他們還未有能力去應付這些事物。隨住小朋友的成長,他們會慢慢產生一些追求刺激快感的傾向,而「風險活動」就正正可以滿足到小朋友對刺激快感的追求,並且對他們成長有正面影響!
參考資料
Sandseter, E. and Kennair, L., “Children’s Risky Play from an Evolutionary Perspective: The Anti-Phobic Effects of Thrilling Experiences” Evolutionary Psychology, 2011 Jun 21;9(2):257-84
Poulton, R. “Evidence for a Non-associative Model of the Acquisition of a Fear of Heights.” Behaviour Research and Therapy 36.5 (1998): 537-44
behaviour model 在 POPA Channel Youtube 的評價
之前我們曾嘗試從 BB 的角度出發,看看他們來到這個世界每日面對的新挑戰,但對新手父母而言,日以繼夜、夜以繼日地照顧小朋友,又何嘗不是天天面對不同難關?身心俱疲之餘,部份父母更會為了小朋友放棄自己的嗜好、減少出席朋友聚會等等,你以為會換來美好的親子關係,有助小朋友成長,但事實又是否這樣?
參考資料
Chau, V., & Giallo, R. (2014). The relationship between parental fatigue, parenting self-efficacy and behaviour: Implications for supporting parents in the early parenting period. Child: Care, Health and Development, 626-633.
Cooklin, A., Giallo, R., & Rose, N. (2011). Parental fatigue and parenting practices during early childhood: An Australian community survey. Child: Care, Health and Development Child Care Health Dev, 654-664.
Lesniowska, R., Gent, A., & Watson, S. (2015). Maternal fatigue, parenting self-efficacy, and overreactive discipline during the early childhood years: A test of a mediation model. Clinical Psychologist Clin Psychol.
Dunning, M., Seymour, M., Cooklin, A., & Giallo, R. (n.d.). Wide Awake Parenting: Study protocol for a randomised controlled trial of a parenting program for the management of post-partum fatigue. BMC Public Health, 26-26.
Weaver, C., Shaw, D., Dishion, T., & Wilson, M. (n.d.). Parenting self-efficacy and problem behavior in children at high risk for early conduct problems: The mediating role of maternal depression. Infant Behavior and Development, 594-605.
Rizzo, K. M., Schiffrin, H. H., & Liss, M. (2012). Insight into the Parenthood Paradox: Mental Health Outcomes of Intensive Mothering. Journal of Child and Family Studies J Child Fam Stud, 22(5), 614-620.
behaviour model 在 Behavior Model 的相關結果
The Fogg Behavior Model shows that three elements must converge at the same moment for a behavior to occur: Motivation, Ability, and a Prompt. ... <看更多>
behaviour model 在 Behavioral modeling - Wikipedia 的相關結果
The behavioral approach to systems theory and control theory was initiated in the late-1970s by J. C. Willems as a result of resolving inconsistencies ... ... <看更多>
behaviour model 在 Hans Shih — 行為模型(Behavior Model) 的相關結果
Fogg 教授提出的Behavior Model,X軸代表能力,Y軸代表動機,當一個人有足夠的能力與動機就有能會做出某種行為,這時候再加上Trigger 就能觸發行為。 ... <看更多>