【台美日共同守護印太安全】
美國、日本、台灣三國智庫共同主辦「2020台美日三邊印太安全對話」,包括蔡英文總統、美國前國務院助卿坎博(Kurt Campbell)、前國防部印太安全助理部長薛瑞福(Randall Schriver)、日本前駐美大使佐佐木賢一郎等重要人士都與會。
我也參與三國國會議員的對談,與羅致政委員、陳以信委員、美國聯邦眾議員貝拉(Ami Bera)以及日本眾議員鈴木馨祐,交流2020後的印太及台海情勢與願景。
結果準備厚厚一疊的英文講稿幾乎沒派上用場,講太HIGH不小心就脫稿演出....。無論如何還是提供原本的講稿跟大家參詳,一起來練習英文吧:
2020 Taiwan-US-Japan Trilateral Indo-Pacific Security Dialogue
Hello moderator, fellow panelists, I am Taiwan legislator Freddy Lim.
This year, due to the pandemic, we can only conduct this panel online. I’m still very glad to be invited to attend this event and exchange ideas with these great panelists. Here I want to share my views on today’s main topic: “Challenges and Opportunities in the Indo-Pacific Region and the Taiwan Strait in 2020 & Beyond”.
First I want to start with the conventional positioning of Taiwan under the established international order.
After WWII, the international order led by the allies dragged Taiwan into China’s civil war. Since then, Taiwan's been struggling with the “One China” dispute, unable to gain independence and world recognition like many other colonies.
Even though Taiwanese people have built an independent and democratic country after half a century of hard work, now we enjoy freedom and human rights, the international community still isolates Taiwan. One of the main reasons is obviously China.
The established international community viewed China as a huge economic opportunity, a partner that would eventually carry out political reforms and be integrated into modern international order. Under this conventional thinking, the international community is willing to help China ease and suppress many of its unpleasant problems, including the thorny "Democratic Taiwan."
This has reduced Taiwan to merely China’s “Taiwan Problem”. We’re even slandered as the “troublemaker” of the Taiwan Strait; As a result, the respect that Taiwan deserves continues to be shelved, and the active role we can play, the contributions we can make in the international community are also ignored.
However, this established international structure is now changing.
After decades of appeasement policy, and acquiring WTO membership in 2001, China’s various structural changes that the world anticipated have never taken place. On the contrary, China’s been using organized measures, such as bribing, infiltration, and hybrid-warfare, to undermine international norms. It’s worked hard to manipulate and control international organizations, in order to project its influence onto the world. These actions have been even more distinct after Xi Jinping became President of China in 2012.
Internationally, China implemented debt-trap diplomacy on many countries through the Belt and Road Initiative. It established Confucius Institutes around the world, which are basically intelligence operations in the name of culture. Chinese tech giant, Huawei also aids China’s international surveillance. Not to mention China’s relentless expansion in the South China Sea, building military bases, creating man-made islands. This year, it’s even more serious. We witnessed the long time Chinese infiltration into UN organizations. The favoritism towards China helped its cover-up, which led to the dysfunction of WHO, ultimately causing the COVID-19 global pandemic.
Domestically, the Chinese government not only failed to implement any political reforms, but it also created the “Social Credit” system with advanced technology, to surveil and control its own people; In addition, the Chinese government built the notorious “Reeducation Camps” - concentration camps in reality, in Tibet, Xingjian, where human rights conditions were already in a bad shape. Even the Hong Kong people, who were supposed to be protected by the promise of “One Country, Two Systems”, their freedom and human rights were completely destroyed by the Chinese government.
These compelling examples show that there is some serious fallacy in the conventional way of viewing China. All facts point to this: Taiwan is not the problem. China is the problem. China is the troublemaker of the Taiwan Strait. It’s the troublemaker of the Indo-Pacific region. It’s even the troublemaker of the entire world.
Under decades of collective misjudgement, China was allowed to become the most terrifying, largest digital authoritarian government in human history. It’s a new form of dictatorship. As a response, many countries have vastly changed their China policy in recent years, thus the change of international structure.
This brings me to my next point: Give Taiwan the status it deserves. Let us contribute to the international society.
In a new international structure, Taiwan shouldn’t be categorized as “China’s Taiwan Problem”. Instead, we should be one of the key countries for international cooperation, responding to the new type of dictatorship.
Taiwan has faced authoritarian China on the front line for decades. Many countries are now facing the problem of China's infiltration under its United Front programs. Taiwan started dealing with the same problems 10 to 20 years ago. We have gained a lot of experience to contribute to the international community.
Taking the COVID pandemic as an example, Taiwan has studied and analyzed the actual situation and the information provided by the Chinese government with a serious and high-vigilance attitude. Based on our experience and lessons learned from the China SARS epidemic in 2001, we decisively formed a series of epidemic preventive measures. We have handled the crisis with the principle of openness and transparency. Our people have been self-disciplined and willing to cooperate. All of this demonstrates the high level of democracy in Taiwan’s society.
After the domestic epidemic was brought under control, Taiwan has continued to share our epidemic prevention supplies and the experiences on forming epidemic prevention policies with the world.
Although Taiwan was suppressed, even excluded by China in various international organizations in the past, we’ve been doing our best to comply with the norms & regulations of international organizations. We always actively contribute every time we have the opportunity. What I want to say is, all of this proves Taiwan could be a reliable partner in the international community. We are capable of working with other countries to solve major problems. We deserve our seats and participation in international organizations.
Regarding the impact of U.S. change of administration.
Now the U. S. presidential election is over and the administration is currently under transition. Many countries, including Taiwan, are concerned about whether the new U.S. government will change its course on foreign policy, especially its China policy. However, the "Rebalance (of Asia-Pacific Region)" proposed by the Obama administration in 2011, was in fact already a strategic adjustment in response to the rise of China and possible subsequent expansion.
The Trump administration further proposed the Indo-Pacific strategy in 2017 to promote and uphold international law and regulations, aiming to ensure every country has the liberty to be free from oppression and coercion. I believe that both parties in the U.S. understand the root cause of the Indo-Pacific regional problem comes from the Chinese government. Even for the Biden administration, it will have to provide practical responses. Facing the new structure, they can’t just go back to the traditional thinking of the last century.
As for Taiwan, the pro-Taiwan acts in the U.S., such as the Asia Reassurance Initiative Act of 2018, Taiwan Travel Act, Taiwan Allies International Protection and Enhancement, were passed with strong consensus between the Republicans and the Democrats. I believe Taiwan could be a key partner to the international community and play an active role in the free world. This isn’t just the consensus of the two parties in the U.S., but will be the consensus of all democratic countries.
In a progressive aspect, the International community can benefit from a wider recognition of Taiwan.
In recent years, the performance of Taiwanese society in terms of epidemic prevention performance, human rights, gender equality, marriage equality, and open government are actually in line with many progressive ideas and visions. The ideas and visions that many democratic countries have long supported. Therefore, I’m quite optimistic that, after 2020, Taiwan can make even greater progress, on multiple levels and in broader aspects, contributing to the international community.
Finally, I want to emphasize again that to truly resolve regional problems, we need dynamic multilateral cooperation. But this must not be a return to the conventional thinking of the past century, which was "expecting" China to abide by the international order. The outdated thinking had been proved to be a failure. Otherwise there wouldn’t be a series of Chinese infiltration and aggression after its rise in recent years, which became one of the most difficult issues in the world. I believe after 2020, U.S., Japan, and Taiwan can establish a new model of international cooperation through deeper collaboration and communication. And hopefully, this model will maximize the security of the Indo-Pacific region and promote peace, stability and development in the region.
This concludes my speech, thank you all for listening.
Lastly, I’d like to express my gratitude to the moderators, my fellow panelists, and the organizers of this event.
I wish everyone peace and good health. Thank you.
同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過10萬的網紅まぐにぃチャンネル,也在其Youtube影片中提到,2014/5/4~5/12のiPhoneで話題のニュースを僕が勝手にお送りするコーナーです。 このチャンネルでは、iPhoneの便利で楽しい使い方(VLOG形式)、iPhoneの最新のニュースや、神アプリの紹介、iPhoneで使えるガジェットを紹介してます。【1週間に5〜6動画】ウェルカム動画→ht...
「information security policy」的推薦目錄:
information security policy 在 粘拔的幸福碎碎念 Facebook 八卦
貿易戰打的金融地雷連環爆
糧食戰搞得貪官全面放火燒糧倉
貨幣戰弄得貨幣重貶到極限
資訊戰開始全面清除惡意木馬設備
這是一個國家準備面臨的全身健康檢查(脫光被通)
多管齊下,中國必成贏家!😏😏
5月15日,川普簽署了一份行政命令,宣布國家緊急狀態。行政命令內容是禁止美國企業使用「外國對手」(foreign adversaries )擁有、控制的電信服務。
白宮聲明雖然沒有指名道姓,但在#中美貿易戰 升溫之際,這個行政命令被看作是針對來自中國的華為公司。
行政命令在美東時間5月15日生效。
白宮聲明寫道,有鑒於「外國對手積極且逐步增加地製造、利用信息和通訊技術基礎設施與服務的弱點」,此行政命令的目標是保護美國的國家安全及繁榮。
—
白宮的行政命令發佈後,美國商務部接著發佈新聞稿,直接把華為放上黑名單,直指“華為從事違反美國國家安全,或外交政策利益的活動。''
上商務部這份黑名單基本可以理解為,美國政府禁止美國公司在未經許可下,販售零件或配備給華為公司。
“This action stems from information available to the Department that provides a reasonable basis to conclude that Huawei is engaged in activities that are contrary to U.S. national security or foreign policy interest.The sale or transfer of American technology to a company or person on the Entity List requires a license issued by BIS, and a license may be denied if the sale or transfer would harm U.S. national security or foreign policy interests.”
白宮行政命令全文:
https://www.whitehouse.gov/…/executive-order-securing-info…/
(圖一:5/15下午西翼、圖二:白宮聲明、圖三:美國商務部聲明)
information security policy 在 唐家婕 - Jane Tang Facebook 八卦
Breaking‼️
美東時間1月5日傍晚,川普以國家安全為由,用行政命令方式禁止阿里支付寶、微信支付、QQ錢包在內的8款中國應用程式(App)。
行政命令發佈後45天,禁止任何人與實體與這8款中國應用程式(App)進行交易。
按照日程,美國下任政府將在15天後,1月20日上任。
—
美國商務部長在同一時間發聲明表示,已指示商務部按行政命令執行禁令,「支持川普總統保護美國人民隱私與安全,免於受到中國共產黨的威脅。」
—
▫️8款App:
支付寶(Alipay)、掃描全能王(CamScanner)、QQ錢包(QQ Wallet)、茄子快傳(SHAREit)、騰訊QQ(Tencent QQ)、阿里巴巴旗下海外短視頻應用VMate、微信支付(WeChat Pay)和辦公型App WPS Office。
圖三:美國商務部聲明
圖四:美國國安顧問聲明
—
▫️白宮行政命令全文:
The White House
Office of the Press Secretary
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
January 5, 2021
EXECUTIVE ORDER
- - - - - - -
ADDRESSING THE THREAT POSED BY APPLICATIONS AND OTHER SOFTWARE DEVELOPED OR CONTROLLED BY CHINESE COMPANIES
By the authority vested in me as President by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (50 U.S.C. 1701 et seq.) (IEEPA), the National Emergencies Act (50 U.S.C. 1601 et seq.), and section 301 of title 3, United States Code,
I, DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the United States of America, find that additional steps must be taken to deal with the national emergency with respect to the information and communications technology and services supply chain declared in Executive Order 13873 of May 15, 2019 (Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain). Specifically, the pace and pervasiveness of the spread in the United States of certain connected mobile and desktop applications and other software developed or controlled by persons in the People's Republic of China, to include Hong Kong and Macau (China), continue to threaten the national security, foreign policy, and economy of the United States. At this time, action must be taken to address the threat posed by these Chinese connected software applications.
By accessing personal electronic devices such as smartphones, tablets, and computers, Chinese connected software applications can access and capture vast swaths of information from users, including sensitive personally identifiable information and private information. This data collection threatens to provide the Government of the People's Republic of China (PRC) and the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) with access to Americans' personal and proprietary information -- which would permit China to track the locations of Federal employees and contractors, and build dossiers of personal information.
The continuing activity of the PRC and the CCP to steal or otherwise obtain United States persons' data makes clear that there is an intent to use bulk data collection to advance China's economic and national security agenda. For example, the 2014 cyber intrusions of the Office of Personnel Management of security clearance records of more than 21 million people were orchestrated by Chinese agents. In 2015, a Chinese hacking group breached the United States health insurance company Anthem, affecting more than 78 million Americans. And the Department of Justice indicted members of the Chinese military for the 2017 Equifax cyber intrusion that compromised the personal information of almost half of all Americans.
In light of these risks, many executive departments and agencies (agencies) have prohibited the use of Chinese connected software applications and other dangerous software on Federal Government computers and mobile phones. These prohibitions, however, are not enough given the nature of the threat from Chinese connected software applications. In fact, the Government of India has banned the use of more than 200 Chinese connected software applications throughout the country; in a statement, India's Ministry of Electronics and Information Technology asserted that the applications were "stealing and surreptitiously transmitting users' data in an unauthorized manner to servers which have locations outside India."
The United States has assessed that a number of Chinese connected software applications automatically capture vast swaths of information from millions of users in the United States, including sensitive personally identifiable information and private information, which would allow the PRC and CCP access to Americans' personal and proprietary information.
The United States must take aggressive action against those who develop or control Chinese connected software applications to protect our national security.
Accordingly, I hereby order:
Section 1. (a) The following actions shall be prohibited beginning 45 days after the date of this order, to the extent permitted under applicable law: any transaction by any person, or with respect to any property, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, with persons that develop or control the following Chinese connected software applications, or with their subsidiaries, as those transactions and persons are identified by the Secretary of Commerce (Secretary) under subsection (e) of this section: Alipay, CamScanner, QQ Wallet, SHAREit, Tencent QQ, VMate, WeChat Pay, and WPS Office.
(b) The Secretary is directed to continue to evaluate Chinese connected software applications that may pose an unacceptable risk to the national security, foreign policy, or economy of the United States, and to take appropriate action in accordance with Executive Order 13873.
(c) Not later than 45 days after the date of this order, the Secretary, in consultation with the Attorney General and the Director of National Intelligence, shall provide a report to the Assistant to the President for National Security Affairs with recommendations to prevent the sale or transfer of United States user data to, or access of such data by, foreign adversaries, including through the establishment of regulations and policies to identify, control, and license the export of such data.
(d) The prohibitions in subsection (a) of this section apply except to the extent provided by statutes, or in regulations, orders, directives, or licenses that may be issued pursuant to this order, and notwithstanding any contract entered into or any license or permit granted before the date of this order.
(e) Not earlier than 45 days after the date of this order, the Secretary shall identify the transactions and persons that develop or control the Chinese connected software applications subject to subsection (a) of this section.
Sec. 2. (a) Any transaction by a United States person or within the United States that evades or avoids, has the purpose of evading or avoiding, causes a violation of, or attempts to violate the prohibition set forth in this order is prohibited.
(b) Any conspiracy formed to violate any of the prohibitions set forth in this order is prohibited.
Sec. 3. For the purposes of this order:
(a) the term "connected software application" means software, a software program, or group of software programs, designed to be used by an end user on an end-point computing device and designed to collect, process, or transmit data via the Internet as an integral part of its functionality.
(b) the term "entity" means a government or instrumentality of such government, partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation, group, subgroup, or other organization, including an international organization;
(c) the term "person" means an individual or entity;
(d) the term "personally identifiable information" (PII) is information that, when used alone or with other relevant data, can identify an individual. PII may contain direct identifiers (e.g., passport information) that can identify a person uniquely, or quasi-identifiers (e.g., race) that can be combined with other quasi-identifiers (e.g., date of birth) to successfully recognize an individual.
(e) the term "United States person" means any United States citizen, permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the United States or any jurisdiction within the United States (including foreign branches), or any person in the United States.
Sec. 4. (a) The Secretary, in consultation with the Secretary of the Treasury and the Attorney General, is hereby authorized to take such actions, including adopting rules and regulations, and to employ all powers granted to me by IEEPA, as may be necessary to implement this order. All agencies shall take all appropriate measures within their authority to implement this order.
(b) The heads of agencies shall provide, in their discretion and to the extent permitted by law, such resources, information, and assistance to the Department of Commerce as required to implement this order, including the assignment of staff to the Department of Commerce to perform the duties described in this order.
Sec. 5. Severability. If any provision of this order, or the application of any provision to any person or circumstance, is held to be invalid, the remainder of this order and the application of its other provisions to any other persons or circumstances shall not be affected thereby.
Sec. 6. General Provisions. (a) Nothing in this order shall be construed to impair or otherwise affect:
(i) the authority granted by law to an executive department, agency, or the head thereof; or
(ii) the functions of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget relating to budgetary, administrative, or legislative proposals.
(b) This order shall be implemented consistent with applicable law and subject to the availability of appropriations.
(c) This order is not intended to, and does not, create any right or benefit, substantive or procedural, enforceable at law or in equity by any party against the United States, its departments, agencies, or entities, its officers, employees, or agents, or any other person.
DONALD J. TRUMP
THE WHITE HOUSE,
January 5, 2021.
information security policy 在 まぐにぃチャンネル Youtube 的評價
2014/5/4~5/12のiPhoneで話題のニュースを僕が勝手にお送りするコーナーです。
このチャンネルでは、iPhoneの便利で楽しい使い方(VLOG形式)、iPhoneの最新のニュースや、神アプリの紹介、iPhoneで使えるガジェットを紹介してます。【1週間に5〜6動画】ウェルカム動画→http://youtu.be/Xi0aObQSsAk オススメ動画一覧→http://goo.gl/mEaMEs チャンネル登録→http://goo.gl/4sNFFK まぐにぃプロフィールページ(絶賛工事中)→http://maguro29.jp/about/
参考リンク===================
引用したサイト いつもあざす!!
気になる、記になる... http://taisy0.com
Linkman http://link-man.net
AppBank http://www.appbank.net
かみあぷ http://www.appps.jp
①24秒から http://youtu.be/smI6cER-kr4?t=24s
【目玉】「iOS7.1.1でパスコード迂回する方法とメールセキュリティ脆弱性」
パスコード迂回方法動画▷ http://youtu.be/6cHZBk-eKps
メールセキュリティを守る脱獄ツール▷ http://goo.gl/5qA44M
②2分48秒 http://youtu.be/smI6cER-kr4?t=2m48s
次期iPhone「iPhone 6」の発売日とその姿が解った!?
完成形モックアップと比較動画▷ http://youtu.be/RU8Iq0puJYA
画像▷ http://goo.gl/lUn4YS
③4分11秒 http://youtu.be/smI6cER-kr4?t=4m11s
エリア、通話品質、通信品質アンケート結果「ドコモの一人勝ち」
④5分32秒 http://youtu.be/smI6cER-kr4?t=5m32s
iPhoneがゲームコントローラーになるG550が激安セール中!!
G550Amazonページ▷ http://goo.gl/zIMHm6
動画の最後に紹介した動画
俺のブログ▷ http://maguro29.jp
実はガジェットも紹介している▷ http://youtu.be/Ru0L9SP9Rck
NEXT▷ http://youtu.be/jJ7EgGyLaOM
SNSとブログで更新情報をキャッチ!!========
【Twitter】https://twitter.com/maguro29jp
【Facebook】http://www.facebook.com/maguro29.jp
【Google+】https://plus.google.com/+Maguro29Jp/
【まぐにぃブログ】http://maguro29.jp
お気軽にお声掛けくださ〜〜い(∩´∀`)∩ワーイ
免責事項==================
まぐにぃチャンネルは、
・Google社のAdsenseを利用し、広告の配信を行っております。
・Apple社の iTunes アフィリエイトプログラムに参加しております。
・Amazon アソシエイトを利用しています。
・楽天アフィリエイトを利用しています。
・BGMなどの音楽の利用=YouTubeオーディオライブラリ、『甘茶の音楽工房』http://amachamusic.chagasi.com/、iMovieサウンドライブラリ、Adobe Audition、ユウラボ8bitサウンド工房http://www.skipmore.com/sound/ onjin音人 http://on-jin.com
詳しくは→http://maguro29.jp/privacy-policy/
information security policy 在 風傳媒 The Storm Media Youtube 的評價
On Taiwan Hashtag hosted by Ross Feingold, we are joined by Hseih
Pei-fen 謝佩芬, Legislative Yuan candidate for the Democratic Progressive
Party 民進黨 of President Tsai Ing-wen in the Da An District 大安區
constituency located in downtown Taipei. Hseih, a lawyer by training,
holds degrees from Harvard and National Taiwan University, and
previously worked for Taiwan’s National Security Council and the Tuvalu
United Nations mission in New York City. She has also held positions at
the Taiwan Network Information Center and the TechGirls organization
that promotes female leadership in the technology industry. The
incumbent Da An legislator is retiring, but the constituency
historically votes for the Kuomintang and we discuss with Hsieh Pei-fen
the challenges of introducing herself to voters, and why she believes Da
An voters are ready to elect a DPP candidate. We also discuss her
experience working at the United Nations and on technology policy
issues, and why both are relevant to voters in Da An, a center for
culture and commerce in Taiwan.
謝佩芬臉書
https://www.facebook.com/thepeifenhsieh/?epa=SEARCH_BOX
✓ 快來加入《Taiwan Hashtag》Twitter(ID:@TaiwanHashtag)
✓ 點我加入《風傳媒》Line 好友(ID:@dyp8323m) http://bit.ly/2hETgWE
✓ 點我訂閱《風傳媒》YouTube 頻道 http://bit.ly/2grkAJ6
✓ 點我追蹤《下班經濟學》IG頻道(ID:@worked_money) https://bit.ly/2WZ1Dnb
【Facebook粉絲團】
風傳媒►► https://www.facebook.com/stormmedia
風生活►► https://www.facebook.com/SMediaLife
下班經濟學►►https://www.facebook.com/workedmoney
information security policy 在 The 8 Elements of an Information Security Policy - Exabeam 的相關結果
An information security policy (ISP) is a set of rules that guide individuals who work with IT assets. Your company can create an information ... ... <看更多>
information security policy 在 資訊安全政策Information Security Policy 的相關結果
Establish information security committee, create appropriate strategy and processes to strengthen information security management and comply with security ... ... <看更多>
information security policy 在 What is an Information Security Policy and What… 的相關結果
An information security policy (ISP) sets forth rules and processes for workforce members, creating a standard around the acceptable use of the ... ... <看更多>