【律政司真係好失禮同丟架】
今天出席法庭聆訊，除了提到律政司的呈堂證供列表裡，竟包括不知警方從甚麼途徑得來的「黃之鋒手機訊息交流記錄」（明明我從沒向警員提供密碼），亦值得講講申請更改保釋條件，要求到牛津大學辯論社（Oxford Union）發表演說的情況。
當時在庭上，資深大律師駱應淦替我讀出和遞上牛津大學辯論社官方邀請信，提到自1823年成立以來，Oxford Union邀請所有演講嘉賓，包括邱吉爾、列根、尼克遜、卡特、愛因斯坦、德蘭修女、達賴喇嘛、登月第二人Buzz Aldrin、馬拉拉、Malcolm X……無論任何身份和背景，都會按照傳統親身到現場演講，並與學府精英交流。
即使駱大狀已說明Oxford Union不設任何視象通訊設備，亦強調這是對於二百多年傳統的尊重，律政司的代表律師（即檢控官）仍在庭上一尾堅持「為何不能用視象通話方式進行呢」，實在匪夷所思，更反映政府何等失禮和丟架。
最終，法庭在無給予原因和理由下拒絕我的離港申請，這給予國際社會一個怎樣的訊息，大家心裡有數。
https://twitter.com/joshuawongcf/status/1207641085515689984
It is my honour to be invited by the Oxford Union to give a speech. However, even with such a formal invitation, I am still barred from travelling abroad by the court and Department of Justice to share our thoughts on Hong Kong and call for more global support.
Nothing can be more ridiculous when US Presidents Reagan, Nixon, and Carter, Sir Winston Churchill, Albert Einstein and Malcolm X to Mother Teresa, Sir Elton John, the Dalai Lama, Anna Wintour, Malala Yousafzai, Buzz Aldrin, Gloria Steinem all had to speak in person, HKGov just asked me to stay in HK and speak via Skype.
The decision turns out to be more ironical when the Union mentioned in its letter saying, “It would be an honour if you were to continue this fine tradition.”Doubtless, the prosecution is limiting my freedom of movement even before I am found guilty. It is a deliberate attempt to reduce the international awareness of the Hong Kong democracy movement.
formal speech 在 How to structure a formal speech | Business of English #14 的八卦
... <看更多>