小編分享 ▶︎ SXSW Taiwan Beats showcase
YouTube 精選釋出 https://youtu.be/wJ-YTr85ulI
〈2017,你(2017, You)〉 | Enno Cheng at SXSW Online 2021
雖然因為疫情,暫時沒辦法和國外的你有直接的連結,但就讓我們在線上相會,一起享受這個剎那、享受台灣的美景吧! Hope you enjoy it.
-
Singer/songwriter, actress, author, playwright, screenwriter. Any of these could be used to describe Taiwanese songstress Enno Cheng. Hailing from the idyllic and sleepy Eastern Taiwan seaside town of Yilan, in 2011 Cheng put her versatility as an artist on full display with her debut album, Neptune. With a stripped down, truthful approach, Neptune placed Cheng firmly on the Taiwanese indie map. Her lyrics, odes to love, the beauty of nature, personal identity, and emotive musings on the alienation of urban life, have endeared her to countless fans.
Taiwan Beats invites four Taiwanese bands, Enno Cheng, Fire EX., The Chairs and NekoJam to play at Taiwanese iconic attractions, varied from mountains, traditional factory, indoor shrimp fishing to Taiwanese temples.
The interdisciplinary Enno Cheng allurres people with her contagious and soul touching sounds. Growing up in the hills of Beitou, cultivated by nature, Cheng empowers her works with intrepid and poetic perspectives. Into the wild, we hear beyond music.
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過18萬的網紅找蔬食Traveggo,也在其Youtube影片中提到,嗨大家!今天這集是... 我自己想拍很久的「10支最愛唇膏」特輯!!! 這一兩年來陸續汰換手邊的化妝品、 陸續認識無動物實驗品牌、查詢vegan產品清單... 也愛上了天然有機彩妝給肌膚的溫柔回饋 於是這集精選出6個品牌共”10支” 分享給你們😊 #LilyLolo Vegan潤唇膏 $63...
06stripped 在 Proud Sweat16 Facebook 八卦
คอเคล็ด..
Stripped neck..Translated
06stripped 在 八鄉朱凱廸 Chu Hoi Dick Facebook 八卦
破綻百出.....
根據香港入境處的《一般就業政策》,「具備香港特別行政區所需而又缺乏的特別技能、知識或經驗」的申請人,在滿足其他條件(包括其「從事的工作 ... 不能輕易覓得本地人擔任」)後,可申請來港工作。[1]
但好明顯入境處就無睇過Epoch Group Ltd v Director of Immigration [2011] 3 HKLRD H2案。
時任原訟法庭法官張舉能在該案中指出[2],通常用以審批工作簽證的《一般就業政策》並.不.適.用.於[3]有意到訪香港進行短時間表演的演藝團體。
換言之,就這類團體的成員的工作簽證申請而言,他們是否「具備香港所需而又缺乏的特別技能、知識或經驗 (special skills, knowledge or experience of value to and not readily available in Hong Kong)」,或他們的工作能否「輕易覓得本地人擔任 (readily taken up by the local work force)」,已非入境處可以合法地納入的考慮[4],否則香港永遠也有本地人才,根本不可能舉辦任何國際性的文化交流活動[5]。
相反地,入境處在決定是否批准簽證申請時,法律上真正須要考慮並給予極大比重的因素,其實是[6]:
1) 外地團體到香港進行文化或藝術交流活動對社會的重大價值;
2)到訪演藝團體的成員不是長期來港「搶人工作」,而是特地為了參加文化或藝術交流活動,短時間內就會離開香港;
3)入境處尤其必須以「演藝團體是不可分割的個體」為基礎考慮簽證申請,若對個別成員作區別對待,在法律上即屬不合理(外地著名的演藝團體大概也不會願意接受這種只有個別成員獲准出席的無理邀請[7])。
根據入境處的信件,他們決定拒絕簽證申請,是因為認為申請者無法滿足上述已被法庭裁定為不相關的標準,但從無考慮法律上真正有關、並支持批出簽證的因素,即使背後沒有政治動機,亦無疑是行政法意義下一個越權、非法的決定。
[1] 如參見保安局局長於十月二十四日在立法會會議上就梁繼昌議員的提問所作的書面答覆:https://www.info.gov.hk/…/gen…/201810/24/P2018102400453p.htm
[2] 入境處處長當時亦確認他們實際上不會強行應用《一般就業政策》來處理此類簽證申請:參見第45段。
[3] 第42段('ill-suited')。
[4] 參見第43-44、50、52、60、62、68段。
[5] 參見第57段。
[6] 參見第49-50、57、62、64段。
[7] 參見第54段。
原圖來自:HOCC專頁
https://www.facebook.com/…/a.1015339726…/10161314509780230/…
(English version)
Under the Director of immigration's General Employment Policy, '[a]pplicants who possess special skills, knowledge or experience of value to and not readily available in the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR) may apply to come to work in the HKSAR', if they can satisfy the Direcotor that, amongst other conditions, the job concerned 'cannot be readily taken up by the local work force'.[1]
The Policy's application in the present case, however, is so completely at odds with Epoch Group Ltd v Director of Immigration [2011] 3 HKLRD H2.
There, Andrew Cheung J (as Cheung PJ then was) was clear[2] that the General Employment Policy, as otherwise usually applies to work visa applications, was 'ILL-SUITED to deal with applications for entry by members of a travelling performing group to perform in Hong Kong for a short duration only'[3].
In other words, in respect of applications by members of such a group, the questions whether they 'possess special skills, knowledge or experience of value to and not readily available in Hong Kong', or whether the job or tasks they propose to perform can be 'readily taken up by the local work force', are matters irrelevant to the Director's inquiry [4], for otherwise the happy wealth of local talent could ironically have the absurd effect of preventing the possibility of any international cultural events in the first place[5].
By contrast, in determining whether to allow such an application for a work visa, what the Director must take into account, and give substantial weight to, are the following factors[6]:
1) the unmistakable value of international cultural and artistic exchanges and activities to (the) society (of Hong Kong);
2) members of such a travelling performing group do not seek to remain in Hong Kong permanently, and therefore are unlikely to significantly (if at all) jeopardise the job opportunities of local workers; rather they are seeking entry for the specific purpose of attending international cultural and artistic exchanges and activities, for a short period of time after which they are expected to leave the city;
3) in particular, the Direct must consider the visa applications bearing in mind that a performing group is an inalienable entity, each member being integral to the group; discrimination against individual members is liable to be found unreasonable (and chances are that travelling performing groups of any reputation would not be prepared to accept invitations unreasonably extended only to certain of their members but not the others[7])。
The reason for refusing the visa application, as stated in the Director's letter, is that the applicant did not meet the very irrelevant criteria which, as shown, have been judicially deprecated insofar as they were applied to a travelling performing group, in circumstances indistinguishable from those in the instant case. On the other hand, the Director never gave any consideration at all to the relevant factors (all pointing to a favourable determination of the application) which he, in law, must consider. It follows that, even stripped of its political overtones, the Director's decision is one that is ultra vires and illegal according to the ordinary principles of administrative law.
[1] See eg the written reply by the Secretary for Security in the Legislative Council on 24 October 2018 to the Hon Kenneth Leung: https://www.info.gov.hk/…/gen…/201810/24/P2018102400458.htm…
[2] And the Director of Immigration conceded as much at the time, that it had never been his practice to rigidly apply the Policy to travelling performing groups of this sort: see para 45.
[3] At para 42 (emphasis added).
[4] At paras 43-44、50、52、60、62、68.
[5] See para 57.
[6] See paras 49-50、57、62、64.
[7] See para 54.
06stripped 在 找蔬食Traveggo Youtube 的評價
嗨大家!今天這集是...
我自己想拍很久的「10支最愛唇膏」特輯!!!
這一兩年來陸續汰換手邊的化妝品、
陸續認識無動物實驗品牌、查詢vegan產品清單...
也愛上了天然有機彩妝給肌膚的溫柔回饋
於是這集精選出6個品牌共”10支” 分享給你們😊
#LilyLolo
Vegan潤唇膏 $630 /4g
色號:#06stripped
官網:https://www.lilylolo.tw/
#Inika
摩洛哥果油持色唇膏 $990 /4.2g
色號:#Auburn Ambition、#Pink Poppy
絕對優雅絲絨口紅筆 $890
色號:#Chilli Red
官網:https://www.pureplus.com.tw/pages/inika-organic
門市:台北新光A11 B1、台中新光中港店B1快閃櫃(5/18-6/30)
#3ina
微刺青印色唇釉 $620 /7ml
色號:#114小姊姊拿鐵
官網:https://www.3ina.com.tw/
門市:台北新光A8 1F、西門旗艦店、板橋大遠百1F、台中中友1F、高雄漢神巨蛋2F
#Nsou
大地之吻親膚唇膏 $860 /3.5g
色號:#120秋收、#111夏熱
沙漠之花霧光唇膏 $860 /3.5g
色號:#211初緋
官網:http://www.nsou.shop/
#ILIA
柔滑緞光潤唇膏 $950 /4g
色號:#Rococco仲夏夜
官網:https://www.1010hope.com/brand/ilia.html
門市:台北101 B1、台北新光A11 1F、台北復興SOGO B1、台北永康旗艦店、台北中山概念店、台北微風南京1F、台中勤美誠品2F、高雄漢神巨蛋B1、台南新光新天地B1
#NUI
Nui美型唇膏 $1380 /4.5g
色號:#Kura
官網:https://www.rawandsexy.com.tw/pages/nui-cosmetics-1
______________________
▋合作邀約 | CONTACT
traveggo@gmail.com
▋追蹤找蔬食 | FOLLOW TRAVEGGO ON
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/traveggo/
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/traveggo
Taipei Vegan Map 台北捷運純素地圖 https://reurl.cc/rlLp8N
#素食 #蔬食 #找蔬食
![post-title](https://i.ytimg.com/vi/nAlbXhzRMUU/hqdefault.jpg)
06stripped 在 Mariah Carey - Fantasy '06 (Stripped) - YouTube 的八卦
Version done by WeBeLambTogether. Check out their channel! https://youtube.com/c/WeBeLambTogether. ... <看更多>