【專題訪問 Interview Feature】2019年度香港大學學生會周年大選中央幹事會候選内閣蒼傲訪問(外務篇) | Interview with Prism, the Proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union of Annual Election 2019 (External Affairs)
(Please scroll down for English version.)
中央幹事會候選內閣蒼傲就外務議題接受本台訪問,就不同外務議題立場,包括不反對政府取締民族黨的原因、相信政府DQ議員合法的理據、初一事件有黑幫介入的看法、及對法律制度有信心的理由等發表意見。
訪問節錄如下:
1. 你們的政治光譜/政治立場是甚麼?
我們認為用現有的名詞並不能表達我們莊的政治立場,因為例如本土、港獨等,第一他們並沒有清晰的界定,或是社會一致的定義,我們都認為不論是政治光譜或是政治立場我們作為香港人或是香港接受教育的人,其實我們的立場都會傾向由香港出發。但由香港出發去考慮香港利益時,我們都要考慮時間軸。時間軸的意思是,我們到底在考慮短期還是長期的利益。加上香港的地理位置、經濟結構其實都十分依賴世界上大部份的國家,不論金融、出口產業,所以在考慮香港利益同時,我們都應考慮鄰近國家的政策、議案的推出。所以如果要用幾個字去形容我們的政治立場,我們會選擇「國際視野,本土出發」八個字。前者是考想利益的角度,後者是執行的角度。
2. 你們是否支持香港獨立?
首先我們認為它可以被自由地討論,特別是在大學之內。至於是否贊成香港獨立方面,港獨並非香港現時可執行最好的決策,因為尚有很多的選擇可加以考慮及討論。另外我認為香港內部的問題都非常嚴峻,例如我們在政綱小册子上提到的外務議題,如學生自殺、高樓價、創新科技嚴重落後等問題。這些都是我們內部必須解決和面對的問題,所以我們會將那些內部問題列為最優先需要處理的問題。
3. 你們覺得香港獨立是否合法?
我們認為任何符合法例的討論都是可被接受的,所以我們認為只要某個人或團體在現時完善的法律制度下,加上沒有違反法律,就應可就不同議題提出想法。
4. 你們是否同意香港政府取締香港民族黨?
首先我們相信香港的法治仍然相當完善,所以就香港一套完整司法制度體系下做出的判決,我們並沒有太多質疑或反對。對於民族黨被政府取締或禁止,社會上有不同聲音,但我們相信我們應遵守絕大部分香港市民都認同是完善的法律體系下作出的任何決策。
5. 你們是否同意香港政府DQ議員?
其實我們由始至終都相信,而坊間一些調查機構都指出香港的法治制度在世界上都名列前茅,所以我們相信這套法治制度可以帶來公平的審訊,所以對於有部分議員被DQ,我們願意相信整個判決過程是公平的,並且有足夠理據去支持政府所作的判決,所以我們對這件事沒有任何特別意見。
6. 你們是否支持人大釋法?
每一個法律的訂立,其實都是由一小部分的精英去開始建構框架,然後隨社會的進步不斷完善。所以法律並非一本已經印刷好的書,而是容許我們不斷修改、去完善,就一些前人的不足作補完。人大釋法亦都如是,我相信重點是我們希望這法列在微調後能得到愈來愈多香港人的支持,這才是一個成功的新詮釋。
7. 你們是否同意一國兩制?
我們支持所有在香港回歸時所簽訂的條文,其中當然包括一國兩制。
8. 你們是否支持國歌法和23條立法?
因為爭議聲非常之多,所以我們不希望對任何未實施或未明文規定的法例作出過多評論。這是對該法案有所偏頗,該法案到最後還有很多相議的空間,所以我們認為政府應充分考慮各種聲音,從而推出一條為大部分港人所接受的法例。
9. 你們對違法達義有何看法?
香港作為擁有完善法律的城市,任何人都有表達訴求或是行動的權利。我們主張每人都有自由去決定自己的事、想表達的聲音,但每人都應為這些行為勇敢承擔相認的法律責任。當然我們更相信這套法律體系是完善和公平的。
10. 你們對初一事件有何看法?
對旺角騷動,很多報紙傳媒都報道了有不法份子甚至黑社會的介入,所以旺角騷動的那一批示威者是否單純為表達而表達的市民呢?
11. 你們是否同意政府以暴動罪控告參與者?
就對這幾名人士進行拘捕的行為,我們希望香港政府有真憑實據去支持,以及整個審訊過程認該要公平。我希望他們得到公平的審訊。
Campus TV has interviewed with Prism, the Proposed Cabinet of Executive Committee, The Hong Kong University Students’ Union, Session 2019, with regards to their treatment of external affairs. Prism has expressed their stance and opinions on various external issues, which include: their not opposing the Hong Kong government’s banning of the Hong Kong National Party, believing in the government’s legitimacy for the disqualification of legislators, believing in the involvement of gangs in the Mong Kok Incident of 2016, and expressing their confidence in the current legal system.
The interview excerpts are as follows:
1. Where do you stand on the political spectrum? / How would you define your political stance?
We believe the current word items are unable to express our Cabinet’s political stance. For example, if you consider the term localism or Hong Kong independence, these groups have not a clear boundary or universal definition given by the society. Whether it be the political spectrum or political stance, us who are Hong Kong-ers or who have been educated in Hong Kong, have a tendency to think from the standpoint of Hong Kong. If we consider the benefits from the standpoint of Hong Kong, we also need to consider the timeline. This (the timeline) means, that we should consider if these benefits are of short term or long term. Therefore, when considering Hong Kong’s benefits, we should also consider the policies and bills of neighbouring countries. Therefore, if we had to define our political stance in terms, it would be “international perspective that comes from a local standpoint”. The former is a consideration to the benefits, the latter is a consideration to the execution.
2. Do you support Hong Kong independence?
Firstly, we think this matter could be discussed freely, especially within the premises of the University. In terms of agreeing with Hong Kong independence, we think that Hong Kong independence is currently not the best option to be executed in Hong Kong, because there are still many other options to consider and discuss about. In addition, I think that Hong Kong’s internal affairs are very severe, like the external affairs that are mentioned in our campaign booklet, for example, students’ suicides, rising property prices, the severely outdated innovation and technology. These are problems that our internal department has to confront and resolve, therefore we put these internal affairs as our priority.
3. Do you think that Hong Kong independence is legal?
We believe any discussion that is in compliance with the law is acceptable. Therefore, we think that under the current, comprehensive legal system, with no breaching of the law, a person or group should be allowed to speak their thoughts on different issues.
4. Do you agree with Hong Kong government’s banning of the Hong Kong National Party?
Firstly, we believe that Hong Kong’s rule of law is still quite comprehensive. Therefore, we do not have much hesitation nor opposition for a judgment that is based on what we consider to be an intact judicial system of Hong Kong. In terms of the banning of the Hong Kong National Party, the society has different voices, but we believe we ought to obey the judgment that comes from what the majority of Hong Kong considers to be a comprehensive legal system.
5. Do you agree with Hong Kong government’s disqualification of legislators?
Actually, we have since the very beginning believed in Hong Kong’s rule of law as quite a frontrunner in the world; this has been backed by some survey organisations within the community too, so we believe that this rule of law can bring out a fair trial. Therefore, in regards to the disqualification of some legislators, we willingly believe that the entirety of the judgment process has been fair, with sufficient arguments to back up the government’s verdict. We do not express any special opinions towards this incident.
6. Do you support the Standing Committee of the National People's Congress’ Interpretation of the Basic Law (SCNPC's Interpretation of BL, or Interpretation of the Basic Law by the SCNPC)?
For the enactment of every legislation, it starts from a small portion of elites that begin to build its (the legislation’s) framework, it then continues to be improved as society grows. For this reason, the law is not a printed book, it allows us to continually amend, better, and complete items that are left neglected or faulted by predecessors. This applies for the SCNPC's Interpretation of BL, I believe the most important thing is, we hope to gain more Hong Kong-ers’ support under these fine-tunings (by the SCNPC's Interpretation of BL), we think this is what counts as a successful re-interpretation of the law.
7. Do you agree with the constitutional principle of “one country, two systems”?
We support all the terms that were signed in the Handover of Hong Kong, and this definitely includes the principle of “one country, two systems”.
8. Do you support the National Anthem Bill and the enactment of Article 23?
Due to the many controversies on this matter, we do not wish to comment on any legislation that has yet to be implemented or stipulated in explicit terms. This would be a prejudice on the said bill(s). These bills still have a lot of room for negotiation, so we believe the government should consider different voices, so as to introduce a legislation that is accepted by the majority of Hong Kong-ers.
9. What are your views on the idea of achieving justice by violating the law?
Hong Kong is a city with a comprehensive legal system; anyone has the right to express their own appeal or action. We advocate that everyone has the freedom to decide for their own deeds and express their own thoughts, but everyone should also be responsible to bear the consequences of their actions. Needless to say, we definitely believe that our legal system is perfect and fair.
10. What are your views on the Mong Kok Incident in 2016?
With regards to the Mong Kok unrest, many media sources have reported about the involvement of many illegal parties, and even that of gangs or triads. So, are the demonstrators in the Mong Kok unrest really with pure intentions to speak up, for the sake of expressing themselves as Hong Kong citizens?
11. Do you agree with the government’s decision to charge participants (of the Mong Kok Incident in 2016) with the offence of rioting?
With regards to the arrest of those participants, we hope that the Hong Kong government has had solid evidence to support (their arrest), and that the trial process has been fair. I hope they receive a fair trial.
___________________________________
二零一九年度香港大學學生會周年大選其他候選人包括候選常務秘書麥嘉晉、校園電視候選內閣、學苑候選編輯委員會及候選普選評議員。
2019年度周年大選中央諮詢大會將於一月二十一日至一月二十五日在中山廣場舉行,時間為下午十二時半至二時半。
Other candidates for the Annual Election 2019 include the Proposed General Secretary Mak Ka Chun Eugene, the Proposed Cabinet of Campus TV, the Proposed Editorial Board of Undergrad, and the Proposed Popularly Elected Union Councillor.
The Central Campaign for Annual Election 2019 will be held from the 21st to 25th of January at the Sun Yat-sen Place, from 12:30 to 14:30.
同時也有5部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過49萬的網紅哥倫布 Columbus,也在其Youtube影片中提到,我的英文發音課程 ▶ https://columbus.cool 然後記得按讚+訂閱 xD ✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨ 訂閱連結 ▶ http://bit.ly/2pFqXeA FB ▶ https://www.facebook.com/littlecolumbus IG ▶ https://www....
perfect名詞 在 陶傑 Facebook 八卦
香港的英語教育破落,因為將英文當做數理化一樣機械地教育。 叫學生硬背文法,而文法教育部優先背文法名詞:前置詞(Preposition)、連接詞(Conjunction)、助動詞(Adverb)、形容詞(Adjective)。中國小孩還未接觸英語化之世界,先被教師硬性規定要背熟這幾個文法名稱,還有「過去完成式」(Past Perfect Tense)、過去進行式(Past Continuous Tense)。我小學時考英文,老師乾咳一聲,在課室叫喊:「將填充題裡的英文過去進行式改為過去完成式。」令我一度對學習英語,非常厭惡。
過了許多年,我才知道真正令我應該厭惡的,不是英文,而是香港教英文的中國人教師。外國的鬼仔,你問他什麼叫Past Participle,個個一頭霧水。懂得一組文法名詞,不懂得如何運用,或寫不出有文采的英文有個屁用?中國人的教育追求機械的形式,生吞活背,中國外交部有大量口譯英語出色的人形機械,英文詞彙個個識得,文法正確,但你叫這等中國人寫一篇如英美作家布萊遜(Bill Bryson)一樣情趣才華的散文,可以用人頭保證,十四億人沒有一個做得到。
【如何判斷一種語言難易?】
根據語言學家蓋伊多徹(Guy Deutscher),20 世紀中葉語言學教科書普遍有個前設:所有語言都一樣複雜(或是簡單)。他在論著「小心,別踩到我北方的腳」(Through the Language Glass)破除這個迷思,表示說法以訛傳訛,背後其實毫無根據。如果說語言有繁簡之別,自然也有難易之分,問題是應該從何判斷?
美國外交學院(Foreign Service Institute)以英語使用者為標準,將各大語言按難易度分為 5 個等級:
詳細全文:
https://goo.gl/HRcLHr
延伸專題:
【經濟愈發達 冰島語愈消亡?】
https://goo.gl/a7LHCE
【語言死亡,等於滅絕記憶、風光,及為人的意義】
https://goo.gl/WSryqK
【英文形容詞:孰先孰後?】
https://goo.gl/Akbtlx
==========================
【 CUP 媒體 】
在 www.cup.com.hk 留下你的電郵地址,即可免費訂閱星期一至五的日誌。
perfect名詞 在 Watsons Facebook 八卦
#W愛美麗
老闆丟給小編一張圖
只說了一句這是美妝新名詞就走掉了
小編看了老半天也看不出這是什麼意思 (怕~~~)
拜託各位大大伸出援手,只要留言告訴小編答案,就有機會獲得小編準備的謝禮唷💝
🎈小編加碼好康送🎈
按讚貼文並留言你的答案:「我覺得是xxx」即享有抽獎資格喔😊
活動獎項:Milani Conceal+Perfect 完美零瑕底妝家族組合(一組包含粉底液+遮瑕膏+控油粉各一個)(共1名)
活動期間:2020/9/30~2020/10/2
開獎公布:2020/10/14
#美妝關鍵字 #生底妝 #底妝
#屈臣氏 #watsons #watsonstaiwan #屈臣氏寵i粉絲送好禮
perfect名詞 在 哥倫布 Columbus Youtube 的評價
我的英文發音課程 ▶ https://columbus.cool
然後記得按讚+訂閱 xD
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨
訂閱連結 ▶ http://bit.ly/2pFqXeA
FB ▶ https://www.facebook.com/littlecolumbus
IG ▶ https://www.instagram.com/littlecolumbus
合作邀約 ▶ columbus@english.cool
其他訊息 ▶ 密我 FB 粉絲專頁
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨
A song I wrote :P
The lucid sky.
is an open fire to me.
We watch it burn.
and it's haunting - you'd agree.
Black and white blurred between the lines.
Angels try for the truth that can't be said.
Yellow slander and purple lies.
He's a rainbow that bleeds the color red.
He's the same as you and me.
CHORUS
I pray that everything will be alright.
Won't you take up your arms and fight.
For the city.
Away to the battlefields with questions that we can't deny.
We are begging for a reason why.
No reply.
You're not a perfect child.
but you always tried to be.
They preach and they teach.
but they're helpless when you leave.
But being best will not make you stronger.
Never thought of what happened till it came to be.
A million cries in a million letters.
Nameless souls in an endless, endless sea.
They're all so dear to me.
CHORUS
Don't you remember.
The other side.
We can complain but we cannot cry.
So open your eyes.
Do you see me!
Do you see me!
CHORUS
The lucid sky is an open fire to me!
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨
哥倫布的播放清單
✬ 原創歌曲 ORIGINAL SONGS ▶ https://goo.gl/2qi5k7
✬ 鋼琴與其他音樂 PIANO VIOLIN FINGERSTYLE COVERS ▶ https://goo.gl/QwmZqk
✬ 跳舞 DANCE COVERS ▶ https://goo.gl/uCpdmR
✬ 合作影片 ▶ https://goo.gl/TzQsBf
✬ 歌曲下載 ▶ http://bit.do/littlecolumbus
✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨✨
哈囉!大家好,我是哥倫布。我本身是一名詞曲創作人,目前住在台灣台北。非常謝謝你們願意聆聽我的原創歌曲,也謝謝你們訂閱我的音樂頻道喔!
我很喜歡寫歌,每當我聽見別人在哼我寫的旋律時,我就會有非常大的滿足感。除了寫歌之外,我也喜歡拍一些有趣的音樂相關影片在 Youtube 和 Facebook 上面喔!
我的夢想是有一天能把寫歌當作事業。當我達成我的目標後,我會用盡全力幫助其他的獨立創作人,這樣他們也能夠靠從事藝術來生活。
我會彈鋼琴、吉他、小提琴、貝斯,目前也有在學習其他的樂器,如果你們想要支持我的話,可以訂閱我的頻道及追蹤我的臉書給我最大、最實質的支持。
Hi! I am Columbus. I am songwriter in Taipei, Taiwan. My dream is to someday be able to do songwriting as a career. Thank you for listening and subscribing and listening to my music!
perfect名詞 在 MONROE夢露 Youtube 的評價
訂閱我的頻道▶ https://goo.gl/zc6u2R
追蹤INSTAGRAM▶ https://goo.gl/LBqRtK
美妝保養 ▶ https://goo.gl/8xDT7w
關於防曬系數和物理性與化學性防曬的部分
因為時間關係比較無法一字一句的清楚說明專有名詞
如口頭說明上有所遺漏或不夠清楚還請見諒
詳細資訊請參考字卡或以下文字🤓
UVA / UVB 的不同?
■ UVA:使皮膚曬黑、曬老、產生黑色素
■ UVB:使皮膚曬紅、曬傷、暗沈
如何判斷防曬標示?
■ SPF:針對曬紅、曬傷的UVB紫外線
■ PA:針對曬黑、曬老的UVA紫外線
■ PPD:持續曬黑係數
/
什麼是PPD?
PPD(Persistent Pigment Darkening):持續曬黑係數
是歐盟對於 UVA 的過濾及防護力規範
象徵照射 UVA 24 小時後仍持續存在的曬黑程度
數值越大,對抗紫外線的防護強度越高
測試道理與 SPF 相近
如皮膚原本曝曬於陽光下 10 分鐘會曬黑
使用 PPD 20 的防曬品能讓皮膚撐到 200 分鐘才會被曬黑
( PPD 20 × 10 分鐘 =200 分鐘 )
/
物理性/化學性防曬的不同?
■ 物理性防曬:
透過物理性防曬劑的顆粒,形成一層均勻的保護層,
透過反射、散射、折射阻擋陽光紫外線
■ 化學性防曬:
利用化學防曬劑吸收紫外線,使其轉化為熱量再釋放出來,
而達到防曬的效果
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
▲ Today's Product
1. LANCÔME 超輕盈UV水凝露SPF50 PA++++ 30ml NT$.1950
2. ELIXIR REFLET BALANCING OSHIROI MILK 平衡系列油水平衡防曬隔離乳液SPF50+ PA++++ 日幣¥1944 約NT$.550
3. KIEHL’S 集高效清爽UV防護乳 SPF50 PA++++ 30ml NT$.1400
4. La Roche-Posay 理膚寶水全護清爽防曬液UVA PRO SPF50 PA++++ 透明色 UVAPF(PPD)26 / 潤色款UVAPF(PPD)33 30ml NT$.980
5. La Roche-Posay 理膚寶水安得利清爽極效夏卡防曬液SPF50+ UVAPF(PPD)42 50ml NT$.1100
6. KANEBO 佳麗寶 ALLIE EX UV高效防曬水凝乳 SPF50+ PA++++ 90g NT$.950
7. Curél 珂潤 潤浸保濕防曬乳SPF50+ PA+++ 60ml NT$.650
8. ORBIS 升級版.極緻抗陽防曬露 UV CUT Sunscreen Super SPF50+ PA++++ 40ml NT$.620
9. La Roche-Posay 理膚寶水 全護清爽防曬噴霧 SPF50 PA++++ PPD 30 75ml NT$.900
10. KOSE SUNCUT UV 曬可皙 高效防曬噴霧 SPF50+ PA++++ NT$.358
▲ Today's Makeup & Wearing
1. 隱眼 / Re Via 彩色日拋 色號Grace
2. 底妝 / ROM&ND Perfect Fitting Foundation No.21
3. 唇彩 / ROM&ND Lip Driver Matte Tint No.04
3. 上衣 / SIVIR 坑紋透膚感針織罩衫上衣
4. 髮夾 / 淘寶
5. 項鍊 / Miyuki Select
▲ MORE MONROE
INSTAGRAM / https://goo.gl/LBqRtK
FACEBOOK / https://goo.gl/a2IWLX
BLOG / http://goo.gl/BvPYs4
MAIL / sleepwalklife@gmail.com
▲ 看更多相關主題
美妝保養 / https://goo.gl/8xDT7w
每月最愛 / https://goo.gl/1ZKnhE
穿搭主題 / https://goo.gl/9pbhPn
VLOG / https://goo.gl/pQWk8E
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
⦿徵中/英字幕小幫手
請來信至sleepwalklife@gmail.com
並附上影片名稱或網址
以第一來信認領者為優先,"請勿"自行上傳與重複上傳
字幕完成上傳後將寄送小禮物與卡片
感謝你們的協助讓影片更完整
📝如何上傳字幕: http://goo.gl/iURCeD
本影片由依庭負責中文字幕
膚況:秋冬乾性敏感肌 / 春夏混和性偏乾敏感肌(鼻頭下巴小出油)
使用相機:CANON RP
影片剪輯軟體:PowerDirector / Final Cut Pro X
📎This is NOT sponsored video
🔊Music / Old_Bossa
/ 影片無授權提供任何平台搬運轉載與使用 /
Thanks for watching :)
perfect名詞 在 Uncle Siu Youtube 的評價
【明報專訊】繼金庸同羅貫中後,蕭叔叔最愛的小說作家就是維多利亞時期的英國人Charles Dickens,中文一般譯為狄更斯。狄更斯最出名的,是他風趣幽默的文筆。別看他的Great Expectations成本字典咁厚,字句咁長就以為好悶,蕭叔叔讀佢時,成日都笑到收唔到聲。可是本文主旨不是Dickens的英式幽默,今天找來的一段文字,背了會有三大功效(哎,蕭叔叔愈來愈像個cheap cheap salesman):
一、學懂何謂工整的英文。
二、吸收英文的文氣、節奏。
三、學會巧妙運用動詞。
試問又怎能不背?看文章前,當然要了解背景。文章取自Dickens名作Great Expectations,故事講主角窮小孩Pip無意中救了逃犯Magwitch,後來又唔知點解有人畀筆錢佢去倫敦學做紳士。下面一段,是chapter 1裏小Pip碰見逃犯的情景。這段文字,一定要大聲朗讀,否則無意思。要聽蕭叔叔不太完美的聲演,當然要看短片(english.mingpao.com/siu.htm)。
A fearful man, all in coarse grey, with a great iron on his leg. A man with no hat, and with broken shoes, and with an old rag tied round his head. A man who had been soaked in water, and smothered in mud, and lamed by stones, and cut by flints, and stung by nettles, and torn by briars; who limped, and shivered, and glared, and growled; and whose teeth chattered in his head as he seized me by the chin.
如果你覺得深字多,唔緊要,唔使怕,因為每個字都要查。蕭叔叔學英文,分精讀(是用盡所有精力去讀,唔係補習社精讀班的精讀)同hea讀。Hea讀唔使點查字典,get個大意即可。精讀嘛,當然要每個字都查,否則浪費了大好文字,對不住好作家。
蕭叔叔最想大家看的是這句:
A man who'd been
soaked in water,
and smothered in mud,
and lamed by stones,
and cut by flints,
and stung by nettles,
and torn by briars;
此所謂工整。每個item都是一個被動動詞加preposition加名詞,而且每個item都是兩個重音,讀起來節奏鏗鏘,頗像詩詞。中文當然也有類似修辭手法,好像三國演義中曹軍謀臣孔融同荀彧在曹操面前,辯論袁紹是否可怕的敵人,荀彧說:「紹兵多而不整。田豐剛而犯上,許攸貪而不智,審配專而無謀,逢紀果而無用:此數人者,勢不相容,必生內變,顏良、文醜,匹夫之勇,一戰可擒。其餘碌碌等輩,縱有百萬,何足道哉!」其中一系列排比句:
田豐剛而犯上,
許攸貪而不智,
審配專而無謀,
逢紀果而無用。
兩字的人名,然後一個單字形容詞,配上「而」,再來一個意思相對的形容詞。效果同樣是工整非常,讀起來甚有氣勢。
你可能會說:下下咁寫,會唔會好作狀?這是蕭叔叔給所有writing學生的warning:學任何東西,都要留意場合是否適合,context是否需要某些寫法。排比句,當然不能句句用,否則聽起來像sing song,一點本來intended的效用都沒有。要多想whether the background and circumstances of your writing warrant the use of the pounding rhythm and perfect symmetry of the parallel structure.
也講講句子後半部:who limped, and shivered, and glared and growled,都是簡短的一至兩個音節的動詞。留意整段文字的動詞,都很能draw pictures:soaked、smothered、lamed、cut、stung、torn、limped、shivered、glared、growled,全部都非常生動,同學不妨學習這種寫法,善用多變的動詞,文章會生色不少。
作者簡介
蕭愷一,aka蕭叔叔。夢想做男神、現實是大叔的英文教學狂熱分子,law grad,哲學碩士dropout,語言學愛好者,以speak English like an educated native為教與學的終極目標。(facebook.com/siuhoiyat)
文︰蕭愷一
■教學短片
english.mingpao.com/siu.htm Http://www.facebook.com/siuhoiyat
perfect名詞 在 練文法-未來完成式Future Perfect Tense|HOPE English希平方 的八卦
Comments10 · 複數 名詞 結尾要加s 還是es? · 12時態懶人包! · 練文法-現在完成式English Grammar: Present Perfect Tense|HOPE English希平方. ... <看更多>