because用法的八卦，PTT和Yahoo名人娛樂都在討論

匿名法官接受訪問

//“[Tong] didn’t do much of anything—he didn’t commit murder or arson,” the judge said wryly. “He is the most benevolent terrorist in the world.”//
（佢既無殺人，亦無縱火，無做啲咩嘢，（如果係恐怖份子嘅話），佢應該係世上最善良嘅恐怖份子。）

至於刑事案件响高等法院無陪審團之下審訊，呢位法官覺得，如果政府咁安排嘅目的要保護陪審的話，「總有其他方法比徹底破壞整個制度好」。

//If the government wanted to protect jurors, the judge said, “There must be some other way apart from abolishing the whole system.”//

關於專家證人政治解釋口號嘅用處，匿名法官認為專家證嘅作用係幫助法庭理解法律以外嘅事，但解釋政治口號嘅話就未必有效用（"flawed tool"），呢啲正正就需要陪審團以普通人嘅「常識」去理解（“common-sense approach”），相反，法官通常會用法律角度去思考。

對於香港司法制度嘅未來，法官覺得可能越黎越接近新加坡，即係「商業法係可以嘅，但當牽涉刑事或人權就大有問題。」

“We might become more like Singapore. The business law is fine, but there’s a big problem in criminal law and human rights.”

最後，佢就用心臟病做比喻，

“It’s a sign of danger. If it continues to develop, it will lead to cardiac arrest. But is it fair to say a person is worthless just because of a heart condition? No, the body is still there to compensate.”

「（有心臟病）係危險嘅徵兆，如果繼續發展落去，終會心臟停頓。但，係咪可以話有心臟病就等如廢呢？未必嘅，因為身體其他部份未死，仍然可以支持住。）

報導原文：
《Vice》Inside the Surreal Trial of the ‘Most Benevolent Terrorist in the World’
https://www.vice.com/en/article/93y47p/hong-kong-national-security-trial-tong-ying-kit

#粗糙翻譯報導完畢

毋忘五大訴求　公民抗命有理
—10‧20九龍遊行陳情書
（案件編號：DCCC 535/2020）

——————————————————
「毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中」
撐阿銘，即訂閱Patreon：
patreon.com/raphaelwong
—————————————————

胡法官雅文閣下：

　　2012年，我第一次站在法庭上承認違反「公安惡法」，述說對普選的盼望，批評公安惡法不義，並因公民抗命的緣故，甘心樂意接受刑罰。當年我說，如果小圈子選舉沒有被廢除，惡法沒有消失，我依然會一如故我，公民抗命，並且我相信將會有更多學生和市民加入這個行列。想不到時至今日，普選仍然遙遙無期，我亦再次被帶到法庭接受審判，但只是短短７年，已經有數十萬計的群眾公民抗命，反對暴政。今日，我承認違反「未經批准的政府」所訂立「未經批准的惡法」之下的「未經批准集結」罪，我不打算尋求法庭的憐憫，但請容許我佔用法庭些微時間陳情，讓法庭在判刑前有全面考慮。

暴力之濫觴

　　在整個反修例運動如火如荼之際，我正承擔另一宗公民抗命案件的刑責。雖然身在獄中，但仍然心繫手足。我在獄中電視機前見證6月9日、6月16日及8月18日三次百萬港人大遊行，幾多熱愛和平的港人冒天雨冒彈雨走上街頭，抗議不義惡法，今日關於10月20日的案件，亦是如此。可能有人會問，政府已在6月暫緩修例，更在9月正式撤回修例，我等仍然繼續示威，豈非無理取鬧？我相信法官閣下肯定聽過「遲來的正義並非正義」（Justice delayed is justice denied）這句格言。當過百萬群眾走上街頭，和平表達不滿的時候，林鄭政府沒有理睬，反而獨行獨斷，粗暴踐踏港人的意願，結果製造出後來連綿不絕的爭拗，甚至你死我活的對抗。經歷眾多衝突痛苦之後，所謂暫緩撤回，已經微不足道，我們只是更加清楚：沒有民主，就連基本人權都不會擁有！

　　在本案之中，雖然我們都沒有鼓動或作出暴力行為，但根據早前8‧18及10‧1兩宗案件，相信在控方及法庭眼中，案發當日的暴力事件仍然可以算在我們頭上，如此，我有必要問：如果香港有一個公平正義的普及選舉，人民可以在立法會直接否決他們不認可的法律，試問2019年的暴力衝突可以從何而來呢？如果我們眼見的暴力是如此十惡不赦，那麼我們又如何看待百萬人遊行後仍然堅持推行惡法的制度暴力呢？如果我們不能接受人民暴力反抗，那麼我們是否更加不能對更巨大更壓逼的制度暴力沈默不言？真正且經常發生的暴力，是漠視人民訴求的暴力，是踐踏人民意見的暴力，是剝奪人民表達權利的暴力。真正憎恨暴力，痛恨暴力的人，不可能一方面指摘暴力反抗，又容忍制度暴力。如果我需要承擔和平遊行引發出來的暴力事件的刑責，那麼誰應該承擔施政失敗所引發出來的社會騷亂的罪責呢？

社會之病根

　　對於法庭而言，可能2019年所發生的事情只是一場社會騷亂，務必追究違法者個人責任。然而，治亂治其本源，醫病醫其病根，我雖然公民抗命，刻意違法，控方把我帶上法庭，但我卻不應被理解為一個「犯罪個體」。2019年所發生的事情，並不是我一個人或我們這幾位被告可以促成，社會問題的癥結不是「犯罪份子」本身，而是「犯罪原因」。我明白「治亂世用重典」的道理，但如果「殺雞儆猴」是解決方法，就不會在2016年發生旺角騷亂及2017年上訴庭對示威者施以重刑後，2019年仍然會爆發出更大規模的暴力反抗。

如果不希望社會動亂，就必須正本清源，逐步落實「五大訴求」，從根本上改革，挽回民心。2019年反修例運動，其實只是2014年雨傘運動的延續而已，縱使法庭可能認為兩個運動皆是「一股歪風」所引起，但我必須澄清，兩個運動的核心就是追求民主普選，人民當家作主。在2019年11月24日區議會選舉這個最類近全民普選的選舉中，接近300萬人投票，民主派大勝，奪得17個區議會主導權，這就是整個反修例運動的民意，民意就是反對政府決策，反對制度暴力，反對推行惡法，不容爭辯，不辯自明。我們作為礦場裡的金絲雀，多次提醒政府撤回修法，並從根本上改革制度，而在10月20日的九龍遊行當然是反映民意的平台契機。如今，法庭對我們施加重刑，其實只不過是懲罰民意，將金絲雀困在鳥籠之內，甚至扼殺於鼓掌之中，窒礙表達自由。

堅持之重要

　　大運動過後的大鎮壓，使我們失去《蘋果日報》，失去教協，失去民陣，不少民主派領袖以及曾為運動付出的手足戰友都囚於獄中，不少曾經熱情投入運動的朋友亦因《國安法》的威脅轉為低調，新聞自由示威自由日漸萎縮，公民社會受到沈重打擊，我亦失去不少摯友，有感傷孤獨的時候，但我仍然相信，2019年香港人的信念，以及所展現人類的光輝持久未變。我不會忘記百萬人民冒雨捱熱抗拒暴政，抵制惡法，展現我們眾志成城；我不會忘記人潮紅海，讓道救護車，展現我們文明精神；我不會忘記年青志士直接行動反對苛政，捨身成仁，展現我們膽色勇氣；我不會忘記銀髮一族走上街頭保護年青人，展現我們彼此關懷；我不會忘記「五大訴求」，不會忘記2019年區議會選舉，展現我們有理有節。

　　法官閣下，我對於當日的所作所為，不感羞恥，毫無悔意。我能夠在出獄後與群眾同行一路，與戰友同繫一獄，實是莫大榮幸。若法治失去民主基石，將使法庭無奈地接受專制政權所訂立解釋的法律限制，隨時變成政治工具掃除異見，因此爭取民主普選，建設真正法治，追求公平正義，仍然是我的理想。在這條路上，如有必要，我仍然會公民抗命，正如終審法院海外非常任法官賀輔明（Lord Hoffmann）所言，發自良知的公民抗命有悠久及光榮的傳統，歷史將證明我們是正確的。我期望，曾與我一起遊行抗命的手足戰友要堅持信念，在艱難歲月裡毋忘初衷，活在愛和真實之中。

　　最後，如9年前一樣，我想借用美國民權領袖馬丁路德金牧師的一番話對我們的反對者說：「我們將以自己忍受苦難的能力，來較量你們製造苦難的能力。我們將用我們靈魂的力量，來抵禦你們物質的暴力。對我們做你們想做的事吧，我們仍然愛你們。我們不能憑良心服從你們不公正的法律，因為拒惡與為善一樣是道德責任。將我們送入監獄吧，我們仍然愛你們。」（We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you.）

　　願慈愛的主耶穌賜我們平安，與我和我一家同在，與法官閣下同在，與香港人同在。沒有暴徒，只有暴政；五大訴求，缺一不可！願榮耀歸上帝，榮光歸人民！

第五被告
黃浩銘
二零二一年八月十九日

Lest we forget the five demands: civil disobedience is morally justified
- Statement on 10‧20 Kowloon Rally
(Case No.: DCCC 535/2020)

Your Honour Judge Woodcock

In 2012, I stood before the court and admitted to violating the "Public Security Evil Law". I expressed my hope for universal suffrage, criticized the evil law as unjust, and willingly accepted the penalty for civil disobedience. Back then, I said that if the small-circle election had not been abolished and the draconian law had not disappeared, I would still be as determined as I was, and I believe that more students and citizens would join this movement. Today, universal suffrage is still a long way off, and I have been brought before the court again for trial. But in just seven years, hundreds of thousands of people have already risen up in civil disobedience against tyranny. Today, I plead guilty to "unauthorised assembly" under an unapproved evil law enacted by an unauthorised government. I do not intend to seek the court's mercy, but please allow me to take up a little time in court to present my case so that the court can consider all aspects before sentencing me.

The roots of violence

At the time when the whole anti-extradition law movement was in full-swing, I was taking responsibility for another civil disobedience case. Although I was in prison, my heart was still with the people. I witnessed the three million-person rallies on 9 June, 16 June and 18 August on television in prison, when many peace-loving people took to the streets despite the rain and bullets, to protest against unjust laws. Some people may ask, "The Government has already suspended the legislative amendments in June and formally withdrew the bill in September, but we are still demonstrating, are we not being unreasonable?" I am sure your Honour has heard of the adage "Justice delayed is justice denied". When more than a million people took to the streets to express their discontent peacefully, the Lam administration ignored them and instead acted arbitrarily, brutally trampling on the wishes of the people of Hong Kong, resulting in endless arguments and even confrontations. After so many conflicts and painful experiences, the so-called moratorium is no longer meaningful. We only know better: without democracy, we cannot even have basic human rights!

In this case, although we did not instigate or commit acts of violence, I believe that in the eyes of the prosecution and the court, the violence on the day of the incident can still be counted against us, based on the August 18 and October 1 case. And now I must ask - If Hong Kong had a fair and just universal election, and the public could directly veto laws they did not approve of at the Legislative Council, then how could the violent clashes of 2019 have come about? If the violence we see is so heinous, how do we feel about the institutional violence that insists on the imposition of draconian laws even after millions of people have taken to the streets? If we cannot accept violent rebellion, how can we remain silent in the face of even greater and more oppressive institutional violence? The true and frequent violence is the kind of violence that ignores people's demands, that tramples on their opinions, that deprives them of their right to express themselves. People who truly hate violence and abhor it cannot accuse violent resistance on the one hand and tolerate institutional violence on the other. If I have to bear the criminal responsibility for the violence caused by the peaceful demonstration, then who should bear the criminal responsibility for the social unrest caused by failed administration?

The roots of society's problems

From a court's point of view, it may be that what happened in 2019 was just a series of social unrest, and that those who broke the law must be held personally accountable. What happened in 2019 was not something that I alone or the defendants could have made possible, and the crux of the social problem was not the 'criminals' but the 'causes of crime'. I understand the concept of " applying severe punishment to a troubled world", but if "decimation" was really the solution, there would not have been more violent rebellions in 2019 after the Mongkok "riot" in 2016 and the heavy sentences handed down to protesters by the Court of Appeal in 2017.

If we do not want social unrest, we must get to the root of the problem and implement the "five demands" step by step, so as to achieve fundamental reforms and win back the hearts of the people. 2019's anti-revision movement is indeed a continuation of 2014's Umbrella Movement, and even though the court may think that both movements are caused by a "perverse wind", I must clarify that the core of both movements is the pursuit of democracy and universal suffrage, and the people being the masters of their own house. In the District Council election on 24 November 2019, which is the closest thing to universal suffrage, nearly 3 million people voted, and the democratic camp won a huge victory, winning majority in 17 District Councils. As canaries in the monetary coal mine, we have repeatedly reminded the government to withdraw the extradition bill and fundamentally reform the system, and the march in Kowloon on 20 October was certainly an opportunity to reflect public opinion. Now, by imposing heavy penalties on us, the court is only punishing public opinion, trapping the canaries in a birdcage, or even stifling them in the palm of their hands, suffocating the freedom of expression.

The importance of persistence

As a result of the crackdown after the mass movement, we lost Apple Daily, the Hong Kong Professional Teachers' Union, and the Civil Human Rights Front. Many of our democratic leaders and comrades who had contributed to the movement were imprisoned, and many of our friends who had been passionately involved in the movement had been forced to lay low under the threat of the National Security Law. I still believe that the faith of Hong Kong people and the glory of humanity seen in 2019 will remain unchanged. I will never forget the millions of people who braved the rain and the heat to resist tyranny and evil laws, demonstrating our unity of purpose; I will never forget the crowds of people who gave way to ambulances, demonstrating our civility; I will never forget the young people who sacrificed their lives, demonstrating our courage and bravery; I will never forget the silver-haired who took to the streets to protect the youth, demonstrating our care for each other; I will never forget the "five demands" and the 2019 District Council election, demonstrating our rationality and decency.

Your Honour, I have nothing to be ashamed of and no remorse for what I did on that day. It is my great honour to be in prison with my comrades and to be able to walk with the public after my release. If the rule of law were to lose its democratic foundation, the courts would have no choice but to accept the legal restrictions set by the autocratic regime and become a political tool to eliminate dissent at any time. As Lord Hoffmann, a non-permanent overseas judge of the Court of Final Appeal, said, civil disobedience from the conscience has a long and honourable tradition, and history will prove us right. I hope that my comrades in arms who walked with me in protests will keep their faith and live in love and truth in the midst of this difficult time.

Finally, as I did nine years ago, I would like to say something to those who oppose us, borrowing the words of American civil rights leader Reverend Martin Luther King: "We shall match your capacity to inflict suffering by our capacity to endure suffering. We shall meet your physical force with soul force. Do to us what you will, and we shall continue to love you. We cannot in all good conscience obey your unjust laws because noncooperation with evil is as much a moral obligation as is cooperation with good. Throw us in jail and we shall still love you."

Peace be with me and my family, with Your Honour, and with the people of Hong Kong. There are no thugs, only tyranny; five demands, not one less! To god be the glory and to people be the glory!

The Fifth Defendant
Wong Ho Ming
19 August 2021

《如何靠筆記背誦片語？》
在學習英文的過程，其實我覺得片語是最不好記的，由於很多字看似雖然簡單，但是合起來之後，往往會沒辦法連結到該片語的意思。比方說，put up with這三個簡單的小字合起來，實在很難讓人聯想到「忍受」。偏偏在英語裡，有許多的片語都是這樣的組合。因此，很多學生在有痛學習的情況下，就不再背片語了。不過，方法是人想的，而且它是有步驟的！

以下提供我個人記誦片語的方式：

1⃣️ 做筆記
很多學員問我，做筆記需要花多少時間？以此圖片為例，我大概花了45分鐘完成一頁筆記(包含事前的心智圖草圖撰寫、查字典例句、看看網路上的搭配詞用法(collocation)。加上自己寫字速度也比較快一些，因此不會花上我太多時間。不過，在整理筆記的過程，有一件很重要的事情，就是「專心」，心無旁騖，避免滑手機、聽音樂、一心多用。在我做筆記的過程中，腦袋裡只會出現片語的echo(回音)，即便利用畫線、畫圓圈的幾秒鐘，我口中還是不斷在默念我寫的字(OS: bring forth 產生...bring forth 產生...bring forth 產生...)。總之，在這有限的時間裡，就是得非常專心，做筆記才有意義。

2⃣️ 造例句
在造例句前，可以先想想，這些字是否有辦法跟自己的生活產生連結？比方說put up with(忍受)，我可能就會造 The teacher doesn’t want to put up with helicopter parents because they are too controlling of their children. (helicopter parents 源自美國新用語，指的是隨時在孩子身邊待命且掌控一切的父母)

由於例句貼近自己的生活，對於 “put up with” 此片語，就會比較容易記住。然而，若是你對於自己造的例句沒把握文法正確，就上網查字典，如果對文法的理解稍微有些把握，不妨可以試著把字典上的例句稍微變更一下人事時地物，硬拗成跟自己生活相關的句子，就會更好記誦。

3⃣️ 試著運用
筆記抄完，不是當畫作在欣賞，而是看有沒有辦法將心智圖記在腦海中，在默寫心智圖前，我會分成三步驟：

1. 記片語的順序(順時鐘或逆時鐘皆可)，先記英文，再記中文。

2. 將每個例句大概背一下。(例句最好越簡單越好)

3. 眼睛閉上，冥想筆記上的心智圖，好比，今天要你心中(腦袋)想著十二生肖的圖，十二隻動物繞一圈。如果有畫面，你就成功記得了！
有了畫面，開始默寫，若是全對，還有下一步的學習要做哦！

在Google 打上自己不熟悉的片語，看看出現該片語的文章或短句，挑選看得懂的即可，以bring in為例(詳見留言圖示)，認真的去看了幾句後，你會發現，對於這些片語不再那麼陌生了！

以我這種苦讀出身的學習者來說，沒有「片語好好背」這回事，只有「好好背片語」的正確方法，才能真正成為學習的助力。希望這篇筆記文章，能夠有效幫助你的英語學習哦！😉

#英文筆記

皆さん「Just because」というフレーズを聞いたことがありますか？意味や用法だけなら知っている方も多いかもしれませんが、会話のなかで使いこなせている人は少ないのでは？用法はとても簡単でネイティブもよく口にするフレーズなので、ぜひマスターしておきましょう！

☆動画で紹介されたスクリプトと解説はブログに掲載しています☆
http://hapaeikaiwa.com/?p=12403


========================================
購読者3万人突破！無料メルマガ『1日1フレーズ！生英語』
========================================

通勤・通学前などのちょとした合間を利用して無理なく英語が学べるメルマガ『1日1フレーズ！生英語』を平日の毎朝6時に配信しています。ただ単にフレーズを紹介しているだけではなく、学んだフレーズが着実に身につけられるよう、音声を使った学習プロセスも組み込まれているので学習方法の心配も入りません！さらに、ポッドキャスト（下記）と併用することで、より効果的に学習できる構成になっています。

http://hapaeikaiwa.com/mailmagazine/


========================================
iTunesの「Best of 2014/2015」に2年連続選出！生の英語を楽しく学べる『Podcast』
========================================

台本なしにネイティブが話す、正真正銘リアルな英会話が録音された音声を聴きながら、超実践的な英語が学べるポッドキャストを毎週金曜日に配信中！会話で使われている表現の解説や、音声のスクリプト（字幕）も全て無料で公開しているので、リスニングに自信がない人でも問題なし！おかげさまで1000万ダウンロード突破！ネイティブの生の英語に触れ、より実践的な英語力を身につけたい方は是非！

http://hapaeikaiwa.com/podcast/


========================================
HAPA英会話ソーシャルメディア
========================================
◆ Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/HapaEikaiwa
◆ Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/hapaeikaiwa
◆ Instagram: https://instagram.com/hapaeikaiwa/

加入吉娜英文FB 粉絲頁
學習更多美式口語英文
https://www.facebook.com/wordsgo/

**********************
聯絡吉娜：
KK音標
基礎英文從頭學起
學好英文諮詢
請寫信到
webmaster@wordsgo.com

**********************
吉娜家教招生中：
影片中有三個小對話，可以學會What's wrong的用法，有外師的錄音朗讀，還有Gina的口語發音解說，有連音和變音。

三個小對話內容：
對話一：
A: What's wrong? You were late again.
(怎麼了? 你又遲到了。)
B: My car broke down. I need to get it fixed after work.
(我的車拋錨了。下班後我要找人修理。)
A: Do you need a ride to the mechanic?
(你要我載你去找修車師傅嗎?)

對話二：
A: What's wrong? You look upset?
(怎麼了？你看起來不太開心。)
B: I'm feeling sad because my friend moved away.
(我覺得傷心，因為我的朋友搬走了。)
A: I'm sorry to hear that. Do you want to talk about it?
(我很難過聽到這樣的事情。你想說說嗎?)

對話三：
A: What’s wrong with you? Why would you say that awful thing to her?
(你怎麼搞的? 你為什麼對她說這麼糟糕的話? )
B: B: She made me angry.
(她讓我生氣。)
A: You should apologize. She cried because of what you said.
(你應該要道歉。她因為你所說的話哭了。)

-----------------------------
我是Gina，我來自台灣，我是一位英文老師，我喜歡學習英文和教英文。我的職業生涯大部分都在教授文法，但是當我真正想要說英文時，問題來了，我不太能自然表達自己。我開始改變自己的教學和學習目標，我想說英文，這時我才知道文法閱讀與聽說可是很大的不同。我發現口說卡住的是自然造句的能力以及口語發音。我慢慢研究口說語音的變化，透過外師的幫助，我的口說和聽力都變好了！：)

我的影片課程，是我對於英文教學的熱情與成果，我的目標並不是幫助你發音跟美國人一樣，我自己也做不到，因為區域性的口音就不同，每個人都帶著自己母語的影響在說英文，這很棒，這是我們的identity(身分認同)，不要不敢開口。我的課程目標是幫助我自己以及大家，可以輕鬆的發音。了解口語的語音變化，學習時會踏實有力量，開口說英文就會有信心！

10個look片語 #01 (第一支影片)
https://youtu.be/_caw9bMfJlo

look at 看著
look for 尋找
look into 調查；研究
look up 查找
look over 快速看過

**************************
我的新頻道：歡迎加入
學習單字發音與用法，實用例句，延伸句，情境句
Say and learn words with Gina
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCuzfZrVItqnsuYZlW5ubdtQ

加入吉娜英文FB 粉絲頁
學習更多道地美式口語英文
https://www.facebook.com/wordsgo/

****************
吉娜提供教學服務：
KK音標課程
基礎英文從頭學起
學好英文諮詢
請寫信到
webmaster@wordsgo.com

****************
look out 小心；注意；保護
Look out! There’s a car coming.
Look out! That snake is poisonous.
小心！有一輛車開過來。小心！那隻蛇有毒。

Look out for the exit off the highway. I don’t want to miss it.
你要注意公路的出口。我不想要錯失它。

Her brother always looks out for her. He wants to keep his little sister safe.
她的哥哥總是保護她。他想要維護妹妹的安全。

Look outside. It’s really raining heavily!
你看外面。雨真的下很大！

****************
look down 向下看；小看，瞧不起人
Look down! There’s poop on the ground. Don’t step in it.
看下面。地上有屎。不要踩到。

A: This building is really tall!
B: If you are afraid of heights, don’t look down!
A: 這棟建築度真的很高！
B: 如果你怕高，不要往下看。

He looks down on Mary for having less education. He thinks he’s so much better than her.
他因為瑪莉受比較少的教育就瞧不起她。他自認為他比瑪莉好很多。

Don’t look down on me because I don’t make a lot of money.
不要因為我沒有賺很多的錢就瞧不起我。

****************
look after 照顧
She was hired to look after their two young children.
A: Can you look after my daughter for me?
B: Sure, I can come to your house to watch her.
A: 你可以幫我照顧我的女兒嗎？
B: 可以，我可以去你家顧她。

I hired a babysitter to take care of my child.
我雇用一個保母照顧我的孩子。

I’m taking care of my sister’s dog while she is on vacation.
我正在照顧我姊姊的狗，她在渡假。

****************
look around 到處看看，逛逛，參觀某個地方
A: May I help you?
B: No, thank you. I’m just looking. (I’m just looking around.)
A: 有什麼需要我幫忙的嗎？
B: 不用，謝謝你。我只是看看。

This is the house I’m selling. Have a look around and let me know if you have any questions.
這是我正在賣的房子。你看看，如果有任何問題，請讓我知道。

I’m going to have a look around Costco. Do you want to go with me?
我要去Costco逛逛。你想要跟我去嗎？

I’m looking around for a new apartment. I have to move out of mine soon.
我正在找一間新的公寓。我很快就必須搬出去了。

****************
look forward to 期待；期盼
Thank you for inviting me to dinner on Saturday. I’m looking forward to it.
謝謝你邀請我星期六一起吃晚餐。我非常期待。

A: I’m still thinking about it. Once I make a decision, I’ll let you know.
B: I look forward to hearing from you.
A: 我還在考慮之中。一旦我做決定之後，我會讓你知道。
B: 我期待聽到你的消息。

The children were looking forward to their class trip to the amusement park.
這些孩子們期待遊樂園之行。

She’s looking forward to marrying her boyfriend next year. She’s trying on wedding dresses now.
她期待明年嫁給她的男朋友。她現在正在試穿婚紗。