trustworthy person的八卦，Yahoo名人娛樂都在討論

【我對Greta獲選為時代雜誌風雲人物的想法】

https://twitter.com/gretathunberg/status/1206159412571889664?s=21

瑞典環保少女通貝里（Greta Thunberg）獲選2019年美國《時代》雜誌風雲人物，成為《時代》以來最年輕的當選者。她以「周五為未來而戰」運動（Fridays for Future），吸引全球數百萬人對抗氣候暖化問題，所代表的正是全球年輕社運一代的化身，影響及感動各地年輕抗爭者，而我便是其中一員。

猶記得通貝里說過：「我們不能猶如沒有明天地活著，因為明天是存在的。」我們與通貝里這一代，正正見證這個未來的出現，而我們亦有責任將之塑造成理想的明天。當世人為年青人站出來對抗氣候變化和獨裁威脅而驚歎歡呼時，這些呼聲實質地化作對各地抗爭運動的支持。在這場為理想明天的戰鬥中，無人是孤島，只要我們仍然活在世上，在戰場站着的，不會只是年輕人或一些人物，而是任何人。

無私，為着偉大的事情而努力，為全球人類探索可能性，在歐洲帶領整場對抗氣候變化運動，願意為基本人權付上自己的前程及生命，這些都是抗爭者贏得尊重的特質。這不止是通貝里，而是在各地為理想、為自由、為人權而奮鬥的人，他們啟發更多人為着信念從沒退後，因為改變需要匯聚眾人之志、齊上齊落去達成。

氣候變化和香港民主運動貌似兩回事，卻有不少共同之處：兩者不能單靠一個地方的努力便能解決，需要世界關注及努力，而且中國在兩大議題上負有無可推卸的責任，但同樣地，中國對兩大問題的回應相當相似，便是拒絕兌現當時許下的承諾。

眾所周知，中國是全球最大溫室氣體排放國，有科學家指出，一旦全球平均氣溫升逾攝氏2度，全球暖化有機會無法逆轉，已有研究指出，若要避免這個最壞情況發生，必須要求中國大幅減少排放溫室氣體。現時中國每年二氧化碳排放量超過120億噸，佔全球排放總量超過三成。在2018至2019年，中國排放量呈上升趨勢，這與中國在《哥本哈根協議》和《巴黎協定》中所作的承諾背道而馳。每當中國被問到這個問題時，便以「中國是發展中國家，經濟急需發展」開脫，充份顯示中國沒有兌現自己向國際社會所許下的承諾。

中國在1984年與英國簽訂《中英聯合聲明》，並承諾在香港實現「一國兩制」和普選，而《聯合聲明》是受規管國家之間協議的《維也納條約法公約》所規限。然而，中國現在顯然拒絕履行承諾，更嚴重的是，中國近年單方面宣稱《聯合聲明》已經失效，指其已經是一份歷史文件，不具實際意義。

以上兩個例子皆證明中國並不可信，只會為求目的、無視所有應當遵守的規例而行事。這個問題不可能只靠年青人去解決，正如單靠Greta和罷課參與者，無法向違反減排承諾的中國問責；單靠香港年青人，亦無法向違反《聯合聲明》的中國問責。各國領導及人民必須團結一致，才能迫使中國遵守他應當遵守的遊戲規則。

=========================

This week, Greta Thunberg was named Person of the Year by the TIME magazine. She is a Swedish Schoolgirl that inspired the “Friday for Future” campaign against climate change. Greta is regarded as the figure of the power of the youth, and inspired many, including me.

I applaud for her statement “We can’t just continue living as if there was no tomorrow, because there is a tomorrow.” There is a future where Greta and I will live long enough to see, and we are responsible to shape it into a desirable one. When the world cheer and appalled for the youth standing up against threats of climate change or dictatorship, we actually all play a role in the fights. No man is an island. We are all living here today, and we will be living here tomorrow as well. It is not only up to the youngsters or the figures to fight for a better future.

Some people are respectable because they indeed did something great and conquered the limitations of humanity— being selfless, leading an Europe-wide climate change campaign, sacrificing their future and even their lived for the sake of fundamental human rights. These figures hope to encourage more people to do the same to really address the issues. It is not up to a few people to resolve problems that requires collective effort.

Climate Change and the fight for democracy in Hong Kong share some similarities. Both of them cannot be resolved simply by the handwork of one place, and China has to be held responsible for both issues, and China’s response to them appears to be similar as well.

Greenhouse gas emissions by China are the largest in the world. It is found by scientific research that global warming cannot be kept below 2 °C unless the emission of greenhouse gas in China falls sharply. China emitted over 12 gigatonnes CO2eq of greenhouse gases and makes up almost 30% of the world total. And in 2018-2019, the emissions shows an increasing trend, contrary to the promise China made in the Copenhagen Accord and Paris Agreement. However, when China were asked publicly about this, its response is simply “China is a developing countries and it is in desperate needs of economic development”. This clearly shows China does not take the pledge it made in the global arena as promises it has to fulfil.

China made a Joint-Declaration together with Britain before the Handover of Hong Kong to promised “One Country, Two System” and universal suffrage for Hong Kong in 1984. The Joint-Declaration is bounded Vienna Convention on the Law of Treaties, which is an international agreement governing treaties between states. Now it is clear that China is unwilling to keep its promise, and worse still, China has recently declared the Joint-Declaration to be invalid on its own. The Joint-Declaration was a historical document that no longer had any practical significance, China said.

The two examples illustrate that China is never trustworthy and do not take any rules into consideration. It will simply do anything it wants, no matter what are the norms and regulations that it should follow. It takes more than just the youth to address the problem. Greta and the participants of the strike alone can never hold China responsible for breaking its promise. Hong Kong’s youth along can never hold China responsible for violating international treaties. The world has to stand in solidarity to be able to achieve results and forces China to comply to the norms that all players in the world ought to.

[UPDATE: Wow there is a lot of cognitive dissonance going on in the comments, it's crazier than I believed possible! And worse, even though my article has NOTHING to do with my opinion of United, some of the anger has turned to me. Someone even accused me of siding United because my husband is American. Lol! Let me state as clearly as possible: United is ABHORRENT and nothing excuses their behavior, and Dr Dao's past is irrelevant. Please STOP repeating that point because that much is fucking obvious. My article is just addressing the anger and discomfort people are experiencing when news appear that disrupts their narrative, and finding whatever excuse they possibly can to still keep their already sealed opinion that United=Villain and Dr Dao=Good Guy. Among the absurd excuses is that Daily Mail is victim shaming to help United.... Yup, that explains why Daily Mail wrote a dozen super nasty articles about United just yesterday. 😒 if you find yourself feeling angry at me, ask yourself why. I already said I think United is completely at fault. Why would you be angry at me? COGNITIVE DISSONANCE. Google it jeez]

Experience cognitive dissonance as it happens! We all have it in our minds that the victim of United was a loving grandfatherly doctor who was rushing to help his patients, and he is victimized by the evil conglomerate that's United.

It is super uncomfortable as our brain process that he is actually an unethical doctor who paid for gay sex by illegally prescribing drugs, and after being caught with his pants down still denies it.

After my brain nudged me "is this for real? He doesn't seem like that sort of person, maybe daily mail is lying." - I took a double take and realized what was going on. Why wouldn't I believe the article? I would believe it (like 80%) for any other random person they report about, why is Dr Dao any different? I barely knew anything about him!

Then I realized it is because it feels very uncomfortable to know that my established opinion that I was rooting for the right team (dr dao vs United) might be... well not wrong but not as right as i thought it was.

Of course, Dr Dao being a shady doctor has no bearing on the assholeyness of United. But it would just feel a lot better to hate on United if he is an all around swell guy, instead of a scary criminal sort.

What do you guys think? Did you feel uncomfortable when you read about the real Dr Dao, or is your cognitive dissonance so strong that you think daily mail is completely lying?

(Not that daily mail is very trustworthy but I trust that they did basic research over these info otherwise they are confirm gonna be sued)

APAKAH MASIH ADA MASA HADAPAN BUAT PARTI KERAMAT INI?

Sedikit catatan perkongsian.

Saya masih ingat lagi bagaimana saya bergelut dengan diri sendiri ketika mahu membuat keputusan yang besar dalam hidup saya, iaitu menyertai politik dan menyertai parti Bersatu.

Saya menyoal banyak perkara. Adakah saya sesuai menjadi seorang ahli politik? Adakah saya sanggup melondehkan jubah akademia saya dan turun bergulat di bawah menghadapi pelbagai tikam belakang, tawar-menawar, caci-maki dalam kerancuan dunia politik yang lebih menjanjikan kekhilafan berbanding kebenaran?

Apa yang menyebabkan saya didorong untuk menyertai politik dan Bersatu adalah suasana politik tanah air yang dilanda kemelut yang kronik waktu itu.

Tatkala dunia mengenali Malaysia kerana salah guna kuasa dan penyelewengan perbendaharaan negara oleh sesetengah individu, negara bagaikan memanggil-manggil warganya yang sedar untuk bersama merubah keadaan tersebut.

Sebagai warga akademia yang dididik untuk berdiri di atas fakta, idealisme dan kejituan moral, saya merasakan telah sampai waktunya untuk saya mula menterjemahkan segala teori dan idealisme yang sering dimuntahkan ke minda para penuntut lewat kuliah-kuliah ke dalam realiti.

Dilema yang menguliti jiwa menemui penawarnya apabila saya bertemu dengan Tun Dr Mahathir, dan seterusnya saya bertemu pula dengan Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin. Kedua-dua tokoh ini mempunyai tempat yang istimewa di dalam hati saya sehingga kini.

Saya merupakan moderator pertama forum Tun (yang bukan sebagai ahli UMNO lagi) di depan khalayak awam di Pasir Gudang Johor.

Setelah itu, saya sering diundang untuk menjadi moderator forum-forum Tun yang dianjurkan oleh pelbagai pihak sekitar 2016-2017. Bercakap depan-depan dengan Tun adalah momen yang paling saya tak boleh lupa. Saya masih ingat pesan Tun waktu itu,

“Kita kena selamatkan negara Malaysia dari kleptokrat. Dulu Malaysia dikenali dunia kerana kemajuannya dan kehebatannya, kini dikenali kerana rasuah.

Di samping itu kita sebagai orang Melayu wajib menyelamatkan survival orang Melayu. Apa akan jadi dengan masa depan orang Melayu jika budaya rasuah, salah guna kuasa dan politik wang ini menjadi normal tanpa ada langsung orang yang bersuara menentangnya?”

Jelas di wajah Tun yang di senja usia itu keresahan dan kegelisahan memikirkan nasib politik orang Melayu.

Selain itu, saya tak boleh lupa pesan Tan Sri ketika saya bertemu dengan beliau (lama dulu, sebelum PRU14). Saya juga merasa bersyukur kerana menjadi moderator pertama forum awam beliau di Johor Bahru sejurus beliau dibuang dari UMNO.

Setahun selepas peristiwa tersebut, saya telah mengambil keputusan untuk menyertai Bersatu, dan telah diberikan peluang untuk bertemu dengan Tan Sri. Antara kata-kata Tan Sri yang begitu terkesan di dalam jiwa saya;

“Kita perlukan wajah ahli politik baru untuk membentuk budaya politik yang baharu. Kita perlu wujudkan budaya baharu politik Bersatu.”

Kemudian saya cermati satu persatu tentang penubuhan Bersatu. Bersatu meletakkan batu asas yang sangat kukuh semasa ditubuhkan.

Selain menegakkan Islam, mempertahan kedudukan bumiputera dan bahasa, menjunjung demokrasi, Bersatu berikrar mahu ‘memerangi rasuah dan salah guna kuasa untuk mewujudkan amalan tadbir urus yang baik dan pemerintahan yang bersih, beramanah dan berintegriti.’

Rujuk di laman web Bersatu, Prinsip-prinsip Perjuangan Bersatu: https://www.pribumibersatu.org.my/prinsip.php

Maka berbondong-bondonglah orang menyertai Bersatu. Dari hujung Wang Kelian sampailah luar negara, orang meletakkan harapan yang tinggi kepada Bersatu sebagai ‘fresh start’ budaya politik yang baru.

Semua orang tahu dan sedar bagaimana kerosakan sistem yang telah berlaku sekian lama, skandal-skandal besar dan kes-kes pecah amanah yang luar biasa, segalanya perlahan-lahan terdedah.

Tidak usah pergi jauh, di dalam pendidikan sendiri lihatlah kes projek solar sekolah luar bandar Sarawak yang sudah mula dibicarakan. Perhatikanlah bagaimana pertelingkahan sesama sendiri berlaku oleh watak-watak yang mahu menyelamatkan diri dari didakwa.

Sayang sekali perbicaraan kes itu tidak dapat diselesaikan sebelum PH jatuh. Hari ini, watak yang terlibat secara langsung dengan projek tenaga solar tersebut mendapat jawatan sebagai pengerusi GLC (yang juga berkaitan dengan ‘tenaga’).

Sekiranya ada agamawan pernah berkata, lantiklah menteri-menteri kabinet yang bersih agar menjadi hujah yang kuat kepada kerajaan yang tertubuh,

sekarang bagaimana pula dengan perlantikan watak-watak begini dalam GLC-GLC? Adakah ada hujah agama lain yang perlu disandang pula untuk menjustifikasikan tindakan ini? Jika ada, saya teringin membacanya.

Benar. Bersatu adalah parti yang sangat muda. Tetapi penubuhan Bersatu sangat jelas tujuan dan asasnya. Tentu kita bukanlah parti yang sempurna, parti yang juga punyai kelemahan, tetapi sedikitpun kita tidak pernah tergelincir dari tujuan asal penubuhan parti keramat ini.

Dukung demokrasi, pertahan agama, perkukuh bangsa, dan yang paling penting, ikrar kita untuk terus lawan rasuah, lawan salah guna kuasa dan bina budaya tadbir urus yang baharu, yang berintegriti.

Sekarang, apa yang perlu kita jawab kepada diri kita sendiri apabila budaya ini kembali bermaharajalela di dalam negara kita, di depan mata kita?

Tidakkah terdetik rasa gelisah melihat watak-watak yang kita perangi tindakan mereka dahulu kini kembali mendominasi tanpa sedikitpun rasa malu dan bersalah?

Mereka inilah yang merupakan Raison d'etre (sebab kewujudan) Bersatu. Bersatu diwujudkan untuk menggantikan mereka, untuk memberikan alternatif kepada politik lama, politik korupsi kepada politik baru yang pernah diilhamkan nama sebagai budaya Bersatu.

Di atas niat murni ini jugalah saya menyertai Bersatu dan menceburkan diri ke dalam politik.

Saya perlu ucapkan terima kasih kepada ahli MPT Bersatu, Dato Dr Rais Husin yang telah Berjaya menyempurnakan penyertaan saya ke dalam parti yang saya cintai ini. Mac 2018 merupakan tarikh keramat dalam hidup saya apabila saya menyertai Bersatu secara rasmi.

Sejujurnya, saya masih kabur melihat arah tuju perjalanan parti ini dikala ini. Ketika kita (Bersatu) menjadi komponen penting dalam PH dahulu. Identiti kita jelas, orang Melayu berlindung di rumah Bersatu dalam PH sementara kaum lain boleh berlindung di rumah lain dan kita cuba hidup seadil yang mungkin (walaupun kadangkala kita tergigit lidah).

Pergeseran dalaman adalah lumrah politik, persoalannya ialah bagaimanakah kita menguruskan konflik dan perbezaan.

Apabila Bersatu dibawa keluar dan menyertai PN lewat hujung Februari yang lalu, saya mula bertanya, masih relevan lagikah identiti yang Bersatu bawa, iaitu untuk menjadi parti alternatif orang Melayu dan menggantikan UMNO? Masih terpakaikah lagi idealisme yang diperjuangkan selama ini?

Jika Bersatu akhirnya hanya mengikut arus yang sama, mula bercampur dengan mereka yang membawa budaya politik yang dulu kita berikrar untuk perangi, apologetik dan merasa tak bersalah pula bersama dengan mereka yang pernah kita kalahkan kerana kerakusan wang dan kuasa yang jelas berlaku di depan mata, di manakah lagi rasionalnya keperluan parti kita untuk orang Melayu?

Akhirnya, orang Melayu, anak muda, generasi masa depan yang mempunyai harapan untuk melihat budaya politik baharu, seakan kelam dan hilang.

Impian pengundi-pengundi yang pulang mengundi 9 Mei 2018 dengan tekad untuk membentuk Malaysia Baharu, gugur dan retak.

Apakah masih masa hadapan untuk parti keramat kita ini?

Hal ini semakin merunsingkan saya terutamanya apabila UMNO dan BN hanya menerima kerajaan PN sehingga menjelang PRU15 sahaja.

Majlis Tertinggi UMNO telah memutuskan bahawa mereka melalui Muafakat Nasional akan menggempur semua kerusi-kerusi yang dipertandingkan oleh Bersatu dan sekutu Bersatu di dalam PRU 15 nanti. Perikatan Nasional hanyalah hubungan sementara bagi UMNO.

UMNO yang sepatutnya digantikan kewujudan mereka dengan Bersatu di dalam hati orang-orang Melayu tanah air ini.

Di kala itu, sekiranya kita tidak melakukan apa-apa, soalan saya, di manakah kedudukan Bersatu?

Ke PH tidak, ke Muafakat Nasional pun tidak. Kita menjadi pihak ketiga yang paling marginal berhadapan dengan dua blok PH dan Muafakat Nasional pada PRU15 nanti.

Apakah nasib Bersatu pada waktu itu nanti?

Apakah masih ada masa hadapan buat parti keramat ini?

YB Dr Maszlee Malik
Ahli MPT Bersatu
13 Mei 2020

———

IS THERE STILL A FUTURE FOR THIS PARTY?

Just something to share.

I can still remember how I had struggled with myself when I made the major life decision of joining politics and joining the party Bersatu.

I questioned many things at that time. Was I fit to be a politician? Would I be able to take off my academic robe and instead roll around with backstabbing, bargaining, and insults in the political world which promises more deceit than truth?

What drove me to be involved in politics and Bersatu was the political atmosphere of the country that was plagued by the chronic turmoil of the time.

As the world knew Malaysia for the misuse of power and financial mismanagement by certain individuals, the nation seemed to be calling on its citizens to wake up and change the situation.

As an academic trained to stand on facts, idealism and moral fastidiousness, I felt that it was time for me to begin actualising all the theories and idealisms that were frequently conveyed to the minds of students through lectures.

My soul-searching dilemma found its antidote when I met Tun Dr Mahathir, and then I met Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin next. Both figures continue to hold a special place in my heart to this day.

I happened to be the first moderator of Tun’s forum (who was no longer a UMNO member then) attended by the people in Pasir Gudang Johor.

After that, I was often invited to be the moderator of Tun’s forums organised by various parties circa 2016-2017. Holding a face-to-face conversation with Tun was truly a moment that I will never forget. I still remember Tun's sage words at that time,

“We have to save Malaysia from the kleptocrats. Malaysia used to be known for its progress and its glory, now only known for its corruption.

Besides, as Malays we must ensure the survival of the Malays. What will be the future of the Malays if the culture of corruption, abuse of power and money politics becomes the norm without anyone speaking out against it?"

It was clear that Tun, in the twilight of age, was fraught with worry and anxiety thinking about the political fate of the Malays.

Also, I could not forget Tan Sri's words when I met him (long ago, even before the 14th General Election). I was also the first moderator of his public forum in Johor Bahru immediately after his removal from UMNO.

A year after the event, I decided to join Bersatu, and was given the opportunity to meet Tan Sri. Among Tan Sri’s remarks that left a deep impact on me;

“We need new faces to shape a new political culture. We need to create a new culture of Bersatu politics.”

I scrutinised the establishment of Bersatu, bit by bit. Bersatu had a very solid foundation when it was set up.

In addition to upholding Islam, upholding the position of bumiputera and language, upholding democracy, Bersatu pledges to 'fight corruption and abuse of power to create good governance and a clean, trustworthy and integrity-based government.'

You may refer to Bersatu website for the party’s principles: https://www.pribumibersatu.org.my/prinsip.php

From then on, a substantial number of people had joined Bersatu. From Wang Kelian to abroad, the people placed their high hopes on Bersatu as the 'fresh start' to a new political culture.

Everyone was aware how damaging the system had been for so long, the major scandals and the outrageous cases of breach of trust, all slowly unfolding.

No need to go too far for examples. Within education itself, you can see the case of the Sarawak rural school solar energy project that is already on trial. Just observe how the persons in question are quarrelling with one another simply to save themselves from prosecution.

It is truly unfortunate that the trial could not be completed before PH fell. Today, the person who was directly involved in the solar energy project is getting the chairmanship of a GLC (which is also related to 'energy').

If a religious figure had once said, appoint clean cabinet ministers to be the strength of the established government,

now what about the appointment of these characters in GLCs? Is there another religious argument that will be brought forth to justify this action? If indeed there is, I'd love to read about it.

True. Bersatu is a very young party. But the establishment of Bersatu was very clear in its purpose and basis. Of course we are not a perfect party, we are a party that has weaknesses, but at least we have never slipped from the original purpose of this party’s establishment.

To uphold democracy, to defend religion, to strengthen the nation, and most importantly, our commitment to continue our fight against corruption, abuse of power, and the building of a new culture of governance, with integrity.

Now, how do we answer ourselves when the same culture is back in our country, before our very eyes?

Do we not feel anxious seeing the persons whose actions we had fought against in the past are now dominating the scene once again without any shame and guilt?

They are the raison d’etre Bersatu was formed. Bersatu was established to replace them, to provide an alternative to the old, corrupt politics, bringing about the new politics that was once envisaged as the Bersatu culture.

It was for this higher purpose that I had joined Bersatu and entered politics.

I would like to thank the Bersatu MPT, Dato Dr Rais Husin who had successfully finalised my registration as a member in this beloved party. March 2018 was the blessed day of my life when I officially joined Bersatu.

To be honest, at this juncture the direction of the party is still a blur to me. When we (Bersatu) were an important component of PH previously, our identity was clear, the Malays could take refuge in the home of Bersatu within PH while other ethnicities could take refuge in other homes and we tried to live together as fairly as possible (although sometimes we did bite our tongues).

Internal disputes are a norm in politics, the question is how do we handle conflicts and differences.

When Bersatu was taken out and had joined PN at the end of February, I started asking, is the identity that Bersatu carries still relevant, that is to become an alternative party for the Malays to replace UMNO? Is the idealism that we fought for still applicable?

If Bersatu eventually follows the same trend, begins to mix with those who bear the political culture we had once vowed to fight, becomes apologetic and guiltless to be with those we had defeated in the past simply because of greed for money and power clearly happening before our own eyes, then where is the rationale of the need for our party for the Malays?

In the end, the Malays, the youth, the future generation who had hopes to see a new political culture, seem to be in the dark and lost.

The dream of the voters who returned to vote on May 9, 2018 with the determination to build Malaysia Baharu, collapses and crashes.

Is there still a future for our beloved party?

I find it especially disturbing to know that UMNO and the BN have accepted the PN government only until the GE15.

The UMNO Supreme Council has decided that they, through Muafakat Nasional, will assail all the seats contested by Bersatu and allies of Bersatu in the coming GE15. Perikatan Nasional is only a temporary relationship for UMNO.

This is the same Umno whose existence in the hearts of Malays in this country should have been replaced by Bersatu.

So, if we do nothing, then my question is, where will Bersatu stand?

With PH we are not, with Muafakat Nasional we are not either. We will be the third most marginalised party to face the two blocks of PH and Muafakat Nasional in the GE15.

When that time comes, what would the fate of Bersatu be?

Is there any future for this party?

YB Dr Maszlee Malik
MPT member, Bersatu
13 May 2020

2021/04/14生命紀實
「時空環繞金球紀實系列」
2626、
「夢婆的古銅鏡
（照妖鏡；新時代形為相機）」、
「申根、日月重置術」
/.原著及超自然現象紀實 王大喜（Rasta Wang)

*夢窗戶打不開，周遭環境關閉，沒有在使用自己的天賦。 /.原著 王大喜
*Dream of window doesn’t open, not In the right elements path close because of the surrounding. /.Rasta Wang

✨✨🐝🥇🤩👇
今日特別代班貴賓：憤怒尊（又稱不動明王）

*=Chakra resetting + Time resetting work. /.Origin Nicole Marks


（時空背景、協助周遭、一位在監獄、一位為媒體人，兩位正經歷桃花劫的朋友, 釋放周遭的仿生獸重量，直接影響客戶深層夢境。）
（Back ground、help with two of my friends , one in jail, the other is a comedian who both encountered disaster in their life both hurt from love circle, releasing the mimicking monster in their surrounding, it shows direct affect client dream and subconscious mind)

2021/04/03（生命紀錄）
「夢婆來與鬼敘舊」、
來看看我神棍老友的「高情商與綜藝道行」！🤩😲😉🏆🏆🥇🤩🤩
當時當紅節目「大學生了沒」的固定班底阿Land, 蕭勤倫當時曾多次創下電視台的高收視率！綜藝能力！創造力！高情商寶刀未老！
*需要開懷大笑的朋友歡迎訂閱！👇

⭐️綜藝節目主持人：阿Land
✨特別來賓與老友: 王大喜 x ☁️❔❗️

https://www.facebook.com/100002626598066/posts/3729788673785316/?d=n

*註：
「要遠避無知的辯論和家譜 的空談 ，以及紛爭，並因律法而起的爭競，因為這都是虛妄無益的。 分門結黨的人，警戒過一兩次，就要棄絕他。
你要趕緊給律師 西納 和 亞波羅 送行，叫他們沒有缺乏。 並且我們的人要學習正經事業 ，預備所需用的，免得不結果子。 同我在一處的人都問你安。請代問那些因有信心愛我們的人安。願恩惠 常 與你們眾人同在！」
‭‭提多書‬ ‭3:9-10, 13-15‬ ‭CUNP-神‬‬

「This is a trustworthy saying. And I want you to stress these things, so that those who have trusted in God may be careful to devote themselves to doing what is good. These things are excellent and profitable for everyone. But avoid foolish controversies and genealogies and arguments and quarrels about the law, because these are unprofitable and useless. Warn a divisive person once, and then warn them a second time. After that, have nothing to do with them. You may be sure that such people are warped and sinful; they are self-condemned.
Our people must learn to devote themselves to doing what is good, in order to provide for urgent needs and not live unproductive lives. Everyone with me sends you greetings. Greet those who love us in the faith. Grace be with you all.」
‭‭Titus‬ ‭3:8-11, 14-15‬ ‭NIV‬‬


「這事以後， 埃及 王的酒政和膳長得罪了他們的主－ 埃及 王， 法老就惱怒酒政和膳長這二臣，

到了早晨， 約瑟 進到他們那裏，見他們有愁悶的樣子。

他們對他說：「我們各人做了一夢，沒有人能解。」 約瑟 說：「解夢不是出於神嗎？請你們將夢告訴我。」 酒政便將他的夢告訴 約瑟 說：「我夢見在我面前有一棵葡萄樹， 樹上有三根枝子，好像發了芽，開了花，上頭的葡萄都成熟了。

約瑟 對他說：「你所做的夢是這樣解：三根枝子就是三天； 三天之內，法老必提你出監，叫你官復原職，你仍要遞杯在法老的手中，和先前作他的酒政一樣。 但你得好處的時候，求你記念我，施恩與我，在法老面前提說我，救我出這監牢。 我實在是從 希伯來 人之地被拐來的；我在這裏也沒有做過甚麼，叫他們把我下在監裏。」 膳長見夢解得好，就對 約瑟 說：「我在夢中見我頭上頂着三筐白餅； 極上的筐子裏有為法老烤的各樣食物，有飛鳥來吃我頭上筐子裏的食物。」 約瑟 說：「你的夢是這樣解：三個筐子就是三天； 三天之內，法老必斬斷你的頭，把你掛在木頭上，必有飛鳥來吃你身上的肉。」 到了第三天，是法老的生日，他為眾臣僕設擺筵席，把酒政和膳長提出監來， 使酒政官復原職，他仍舊遞杯在法老手中； 但把膳長掛起來，正如 約瑟 向他們所解的話。 酒政卻不記念 約瑟 ，竟忘了他。」
‭‭創世記‬ ‭40:1-2, 6, 8-10, 12-23‬ ‭CUNP-神‬‬

‬‬ （目前專注於療癒及生命紀錄，也恢復線上諮詢及捐款，如需手術請至以下官網詳閱。☀️🙏)

資訊如下
台幣帳號：
戶名：王大囍
銀行代號：808
銀行名稱：玉山銀行內湖分行
帳號：0462968127363

銀行代號：048
銀行名稱：王道銀行
帳號：01000115473288

美元帳號：
戶名：王大囍
E.SUN Multi-Currency Deposit
存戶帳號：0015879086033

Dream Walker™: RastaWang.com
（夢行者,™，醒夢人）