กรณีศึกษา คนไทยเติมเกม RAGNAROK พันล้าน / โดย ลงทุนแมน
Ragnarok M เกมมือถือจากค่าย Gravity
เริ่มเข้ามาเปิดตัวในประเทศไทย เดือนตุลาคม ปี 2018
...Continue ReadingCase Study Thai people fill the game ragnarok billion / by investing man
Ragnarok m mobile game from gravity camp
Starting to launch in Thailand October 2018
Gravity Company's stock price
October 2018 price $ 18 per share
Currently $ 87 per share
Almost 5 times increase within just 7 months.
So what happened? Invest, man will tell you about it.
For Online Gaming fans in Thailand, many people know..
Ragnarok had a thriving era 17 years ago
However, from many loopholes and problems make the game less popular.
Some stop playing, some change to other games, and many others turn to play on servers made up of copyright infrinfringement.
But with a strong ragnarok brand
Gravity came back to fix his hand with RAGNAROK 2 but still couldn't make it.
Until 2015 gravity decided to develop mobile games with
The Dream Network Technology company from China under ragnarok m game..
Year 2015, the company only earn 950 million baht. Loss of 451 million baht.
However, this comeback is an important turning point.
And it seems like gravity company's life.
Year 2016 Income 1,400 million baht. Profit 1.4 million baht.
Year 2017 Income 3,800 million baht. Profit 355 million baht.
Year 2018 Income 7,600 million baht. Profit 940 million baht.
Company Revenue and profits grow like a leap.
By now gravity has a proportion of income from
Mobile Games 83.5 %
Pc Game 13.4 %
Other 3.1 %
Ragnarok brand new bets with a growing mobile game business shows that the fan club over ten years ago hasn't gone anywhere and always looking forward to popular games.
So what gravity develops with the dream network technology
What problems have you solved in the past?..
Bot Problem (Playprogram) is solved by packing bot system in the game.
Buying-selling problems in the game is solved by central market system. Similar to stock market.
The model is also adjusted from the recharge card to open for free play.
But trailer with monthly VIP sales, gacha pong and bidding system using in-game coins as intermediary.
And here comes what many of us want to know
How Much Thai people fill with ragnarok..
Gravity Company revenue from mobile games and applications
Taiwan 2,370 million baht (ROM LAUNCHED OCTOBER 2017)
South Korea 1,865 million baht (Rom launches March 2018)
Thai 1,190 million baht (Rom launches October 2018)
Philippines 400 million baht (ROM LAUNCHED OCTOBER 2018)
Indonesia 250 million baht (ROM LAUNCHED OCTOBER 2018)
And more, all together, worth more than 6,800 million baht..
What if you ask
It only happens once when people play during the launch or it's difficult to answer.
Because of the latest results numbers.
Quarter 1, 2019 compared to quarter 4, 2018 indicated
Income Increase 18 %
Profit increase by 18 %..
All of this resulted in gravity company to rise over 15.6 % within one day after the announcement of the 1ND QUARTER OF 2019 and the highest point in company history..
Ending with interesting information
Indonesian players bid on Eva-01 in ragnarok m game with one set in the game.
Ended up at $ 490,620 cats worth more than 2.7 million baht.
╔═══════════╗
Read, invest, man, more fun.
Read in blockdit app
Load at blockdit.com
╚═══════════╝
Reference
-Gravity Annual Report 2018, Quarterly Report Q1 2019Translated
同時也有1部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過63萬的網紅蒟蒻講幹話,也在其Youtube影片中提到,https://youtu.be/1K6LJdiIGjc 歐美對數字的念法與亞洲大不同 本單元提供基礎的數字英文唸法 包含價錢、時間與年份 希望大家能學以致用,讓老外豎起大拇指 小額贊助安撫蒟嫂 https://p.ecpay.com.tw/E2494 本單元出現的單字 六點整/ Six O'...
quarter past ten 在 留英彩妝師-Snowkei阿姨的不時尚日記 Facebook 八卦
我只是個台灣俗2-
就算英文日常用語可以存活,但是台灣囡仔ㄐ很多時候講話方式還是很單一,這裡說的不是文法問題,而是我的用字重複性很高,每次說法就那一種,而歪果人講話片語用量很大,很多時候跟朋友傳訊息同時都要一直查字典XD on/off/out/at...只要接上不同的介係詞意思就完全不同了,很奇妙啊!
舉例來說:
1.你在找什麼?
ㄐ:what are you looking for?(萬年不變的問法XD)
另解:what are you after?
2.你幾點會到?
ㄐ:when will you arrive?
另解:when can I expect you?
3.買了下酒菜
ㄐ:bought something to go with wine
另解:bought something to complement the wine
3的例子是朋友今天跟我說的,對不起ㄐ某實在才疏學淺都不知道可以用complement這個動詞,看來我給人的印象應該是個台灣來的大老粗吧?!
然後之前跟人家講時間也是讓我困擾久久,幾點幾分我就是習慣講幾點幾分啊!為什麼他們都要加來減去的?
ex-
9:30
ㄐ:nine thirty
另解:half past nine(9點又過半小時了)
4:45
ㄐ:four forty-five
另解:quarter to five(還有15分鐘5點)
6:50
ㄐ:six fifty
另解:ten to seven(還有10分鐘7點)
3:15
ㄐ:three fifteen
另解:quarter past three(3點又過15分鐘了)
純粹分享自己台灣俗的心得不是在教學,也不是要表現得自己很厲害一樣科科~~閒聊而已
quarter past ten 在 元毓 Facebook 八卦
根據計算,100萬人遊行隊伍要從維多利亞公園排到廣東;200萬人遊行則要排到泰國。
順道一提香港15~30歲人口約莫100出頭萬人。以照片人群幾乎都是此年齡帶來看,兩個數字都是明顯誇大太多了。
另一個可以參考的是1969年的Woodstock Music & Art Fair,幾天內湧進40萬人次,照片看起來也是滿山滿谷的人。(http://sites.psu.edu/…/upl…/sites/851/2013/01/Woodstock3.jpg)
當年40萬人次引發驚人的大塞車,幾乎花十幾個小時才逐漸清場。
而香港遊行清場速度明顯快得多。
順道一提,因此運動而認定「你的父母不愛你」的白痴論述也如同文化大革命時的「爹親娘親不如毛主席親」般開始出現:
https://www.facebook.com/SaluteToHKPolice/videos/350606498983830/UzpfSTUyNzM2NjA3MzoxMDE1NjMyMTM4NjY3MTA3NA/
EVERY MAJOR NEWS outlet in the world is reporting that two million people, well over a quarter of our population, joined a single protest.
.
It’s an astonishing thought that filled an enthusiastic old marcher like me with pride. Unfortunately, it’s almost certainly not true.
.
A march of two million people would fill a street that was 58 kilometers long, starting at Victoria Park in Hong Kong and ending in Tanglangshan Country Park in Guangdong, according to one standard crowd estimation technique.
.
If the two million of us stood in a queue, we’d stretch 914 kilometers (568 miles), from Victoria Park to Thailand. Even if all of us marched in a regiment 25 people abreast, our troop would stretch towards the Chinese border.
.
Yes, there was a very large number of us there. But getting key facts wrong helps nobody. Indeed, it could hurt the protesters more than anyone.
.
For math geeks only, here’s a discussion of the actual numbers that I hope will interest you whatever your political views.
.
.
DO NUMBERS MATTER?
.
People have repeatedly asked me to find out “the real number” of people at the recent mass rallies in Hong Kong.
.
I declined for an obvious reason: There was a huge number of us. What does it matter whether it was hundreds of thousands or a million? That’s not important.
.
But my critics pointed out that the word “million” is right at the top of almost every report about the marches. Clearly it IS important.
.
.
FIRST, THE SCIENCE
.
In the west, drone photography is analyzed to estimate crowd sizes.
.
This reporter apologizes for not having found a comprehensive database of drone images of the Hong Kong protests.
.
But we can still use related methods, such as density checks, crowd-flow data and impact assessments. Universities which have gathered Hong Kong protest march data using scientific methods include Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong University of Science and Technology, University of Hong Kong, and Hong Kong Baptist University.
.
.
DENSITY CHECKS
.
Figures gathered in the past by Hong Kong Polytechnic specialists using satellite photo analysis found a density level of one square meter per marcher. Modern analysis suggests this remains roughly accurate.
.
I know from experience that Hong Kong marches feature long periods of normal spacing (one square meter or one and half per person, walking) and shorter periods of tight spacing (half a square meter or less per person, mostly standing).
.
.
JOINERS AND SPEED
.
We need to include people who join halfway. In the past, a Hong Kong University analysis using visual counting methods cross-referenced with one-on-one interviews indicated that estimates should be boosted by 12% to accurately reflect late joiners. These days, we’re much more generous in estimating joiners.
.
As for speed, a Hong Kong Baptist University survey once found a passing rate of 4,000 marchers every ten minutes.
.
Videos of the recent rallies indicates that joiner numbers and stop-start progress were highly erratic and difficult to calculate with any degree of certainty.
.
.
DISTANCE MULTIPLIED BY DENSITY
.
But scientists have other tools. We know the walking distance between Victoria Park and Tamar Park is 2.9 kilometers. Although there was overspill, the bulk of the marchers went along Hennessy Road in Wan Chai, which is about 25 meters (or 82 feet) wide, and similar connected roads, some wider, some narrower.
.
Steve Doig, a specialist in crowd analysis approached by the Columbia Journalism Review (CJR), analyzed an image of Hong Kong marchers to find a density level of 7,000 people in a 210-meter space. Although he emphasizes that crowd estimates are never an exact science, that figure means one million Hong Kong marchers would need a street 18.6 miles long – which is 29 kilometers.
.
Extrapolating these figures for the June 16 claim of two million marchers, you’d need a street 58 kilometers long.
.
Could this problem be explained away by the turnover rate of Hong Kong marchers, which likely allowed the main (three kilometer) route to be filled more than once?
.
The answer is yes, to some extent. But the crowd would have to be moving very fast to refill the space a great many times over in a single afternoon and evening. It wasn’t. While I can walk the distance from Victoria Park to Tamar in 41 minutes on a quiet holiday afternoon, doing the same thing during a march takes many hours.
.
More believable: There was a huge number of us, but not a million, and certainly not two million.
.
.
IMPACT MEASUREMENTS
.
A second, parallel way of analyzing the size of the crowd is to seek evidence of the effects of the marchers’ absence from their normal roles in society.
.
If we extract two million people out of a population of 7.4 million, many basic services would be severely affected while many others would grind to a complete halt.
.
Manpower-intensive sectors of society, such as transport, would be badly affected by mass absenteeism. Industries which do their main business on the weekends, such as retail, restaurants, hotels, tourism, coffee shops and so on would be hard hit. Round-the-clock operations such as hospitals and emergency services would be severely troubled, as would under-the-radar jobs such as infrastructure and utility maintenance.
.
There seems to be no evidence that any of that happened in Hong Kong.
.
.
HOW DID WE GET INTO THIS MESS?
.
To understand that, a bit of historical context is necessary.
.
In 2003, a very large number of us walked from Victoria Park to Central. The next day, newspapers gave several estimates of crowd size.
.
The differences were small. Academics said it was 350,000 plus. The police counted 466,000. The organizers, a group called the Civil Rights Front, rounded it up to 500,000.
.
No controversy there. But there was trouble ahead.
.
.
THINGS FALL APART
.
At a repeat march the following year, it was obvious to all of us that our numbers were far lower that the previous year. The people counting agreed: the academics said 194,000 and the police said 200,000.
.
But the Civil Rights Front insisted that there were MORE than the previous year’s march: 530,000 people.
.
The organizers lost credibility even with us, their own supporters. To this day, we all quote the 2003 figure as the high point of that period, ignoring their 2004 invention.
.
.
THE TRUTH COUNTS
.
The organizers had embarrassed the marchers. The following year several organizations decided to serve us better, with detailed, scientific counts.
.
After the 2005 march, the academics said the headcount was between 60,000 and 80,000 and the police said 63,000. Separate accounts by other independent groups agreed that it was below 100,000.
.
But the organizers? The Civil Rights Front came out with the awkward claim that it was a quarter of a million. Ouch. (This data is easily confirmed from multiple sources in newspaper archives.)
.
.
AN UNEXPECTED TWIST
.
But then came a twist. Some in the Western media chose to present ONLY the organizer’s “outlier” claim.
.
“Dressed in black and chanting ‘one man, one vote’, a quarter of a million people marched through Hong Kong yesterday,” said the Times of London in 2005.
.
“A quarter of a million protesters marched through Hong Kong yesterday to demand full democracy from their rulers in Beijing,” reported the UK Independent.
.
It became obvious that international media outlets were committed to emphasizing whichever claim made the Hong Kong government (and by extension, China) look as bad as possible. Accuracy was nowhere in the equation.
.
.
STRATEGICALLY CHOSEN
.
At universities in Hong Kong, there were passionate discussions about the apparent decision to pump up the numbers as a strategy, with the international media in mind. Activists saw two likely positive outcomes.
.
First, anyone who actually wanted the truth would choose a middle point as the “real” number: thus it was worth making the organizers’ number as high as possible. (The police could be presented as corrupt puppets of Beijing.)
.
Second, international reporters always favored the largest number, since it implicitly criticized China. Once the inflated figure was established in the Western media, it would become the generally accepted figure in all publications.
.
Both of the activists’ predictions turned out to be bang on target. In the following years, headcounts by social scientists and police were close or even impressively confirmed the other—but were ignored by the agenda-driven international media, who usually printed only the organizers’ claims.
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION
.
Skip this section unless you want additional examples to reinforce the point.
.
In 2011, researchers and police said that between 63,000 and 95,000 of us marched. Our delightfully imaginative organizers multiplied by four to claim there were 400,000 of us.
.
In 2012, researchers and police produced headcounts similar to the previous year: between 66,000 and 97,000. But the organizers claimed that it was 430,000. (These data can also be easily confirmed in any newspaper archive.)
.
.
SKIP THIS SECTION TOO
.
Unless you’re interested in the police angle. Why are police figures seen as lower than others? On reviewing data, two points emerge.
.
First, police estimates rise and fall with those of independent researchers, suggesting that they function correctly: they are not invented. Many are slightly lower, but some match closely and others are slightly higher. This suggests that the police simply have a different counting method.
.
Second, police sources explain that live estimates of attendance are used for “effective deployment” of staff. The number of police assigned to work on the scene is a direct reflection of the number of marchers counted. Thus officers have strong motivation to avoid deliberately under-estimating numbers.
.
.
RECENT MASS RALLIES
.
Now back to the present: this hot, uncomfortable summer.
.
Academics put the 2019 June 9 rally at 199,500, and police at 240,000. Some people said the numbers should be raised or even doubled to reflect late joiners or people walking on parallel roads. Taking the most generous view, this gave us total estimates of 400,000 to 480,000.
.
But the organizers, God bless them, claimed that 1.03 million marched: this was four times the researchers’ conservative view and more than double the generous view.
.
The addition of the “.03m” caused a bit of mirth among social scientists. Even an academic writing in the rabidly pro-activist Hong Kong Free Press struggled to accept it. “Undoubtedly, the anti-amendment group added the extra .03 onto the exact one million figure in order to give their estimate a veneer of accuracy,” wrote Paul Stapleton.
.
.
MIND-BOGGLING ESTIMATE
.
But the vast majority of international media and social media printed ONLY the organizers’ eyebrow-raising claim of a million plus—and their version soon fed back into the system and because the “accepted” number. (Some mentioned other estimates in early reports and then dropped them.)
.
The same process was repeated for the following Sunday, June 16, when the organizers’ frankly unbelievable claim of “about two million” was taken as gospel in the majority of international media.
.
“Two million people in Hong Kong protest China's growing influence,” reported Fox News.
.
“A record two million people – over a quarter of the city’s population” joined the protest, said the Guardian this morning.
.
“Hong Kong leader apologizes as TWO MILLION take to the streets,” said the Sun newspaper in the UK.
.
Friends, colleagues, fellow journalists—what happened to fact-checking? What happened to healthy skepticism? What happened to attempts at balance?
.
.
CONCLUSIONS?
.
I offer none. I prefer that you do your own research and draw your own conclusions. This is just a rough overview of the scientific and historical data by a single old-school citizen-journalist working in a university coffee shop.
.
I may well have made errors on individual data points, although the overall message, I hope, is clear.
.
Hong Kong people like to march.
.
We deserve better data.
.
We need better journalism. Easily debunked claims like “more than a quarter of the population hit the streets” help nobody.
.
International media, your hostile agendas are showing. Raise your game.
.
Organizers, stop working against the scientists and start working with them.
.
Hong Kong people value truth.
.
We’re not stupid. (And we’re not scared of math!)
quarter past ten 在 蒟蒻講幹話 Youtube 的評價
https://youtu.be/1K6LJdiIGjc
歐美對數字的念法與亞洲大不同
本單元提供基礎的數字英文唸法
包含價錢、時間與年份
希望大家能學以致用,讓老外豎起大拇指
小額贊助安撫蒟嫂 https://p.ecpay.com.tw/E2494
本單元出現的單字
六點整/ Six O'clock
六點五分/ Five past six
六點十分/ Ten past six
六點十五分/ Quarter past six
六點半/ Half past six / Half to seven
六點四十五分 / Quarter to seven
六點五十分/ Ten to seven
六點五十五分/ Five to seven
1995年 / Nineteen ninety five
千禧年 / Millennium
2001 / Two thousand one
2010 / Twenty ten
2017 / Twenty seventeen
蒟蒻學英文系列影片~
學英文到底有什麼用https://youtu.be/I83UIuX0wDs
辦公室職稱英文https://youtu.be/ELUIWZbygQ4
臉部英文大解析https://youtu.be/BCEwQgNtJLE
電影明星的英文念法https://youtu.be/pi06knRMkuI
跟數字有關的英文https://youtu.be/1K6LJdiIGjc
美國有幾個時區https://youtu.be/hZsZvlSRbCs
這些女鞋的英文怎麼說https://youtu.be/c5PI5lOmERM
跟天災有關的英文https://youtu.be/tz9hQADAkXo
跟身體有關的英文https://youtu.be/oX-rlkmpvCk
婚禮誓詞的英文https://youtu.be/VdHqMm7jnik
跟狗狗有關的英文https://youtu.be/O6_aDwO4Zho
跟廚房有關的英文https://youtu.be/QVtprVv1NjU
跟電玩有關的英文https://youtu.be/h3oFg8KpLVg
跟雞雞有關的英文https://youtu.be/Q6iOZQChkQw
跟妹妹有關的英文https://youtu.be/f_eLuPU2BhU
跟死亡有關的英文https://youtu.be/nFIt6B6SooQ
跟槍械有關的英文https://youtu.be/uPJP3PX_9n0
如何跟外國人聊天https://youtu.be/wBwVFrDXmb4
跟棒球有關的英文https://youtu.be/BD3wAN56fOM
軍事英文唸法https://youtu.be/3mmdlySlOXQ
亞洲國家的英文https://youtu.be/CZaAywriF-E
歐洲國家的英文https://youtu.be/BVoe1bcqBWM
美洲國家的英文https://youtu.be/-N0OP7AI0a0
非洲國家的英文https://youtu.be/hbxFB5JLPxk
大洋洲國家的英文https://youtu.be/hW1uHKOyjf0
如何利用部位來搜A片https://youtu.be/lbwRlnpKg3g
各種性愛體位的英文https://youtu.be/3fgVnczCIYY
有碼無碼的英文https://youtu.be/KWYqyRAYnNE
SM和多P的英文https://youtu.be/3GRktd9_-T4
有關地標的英文https://youtu.be/yvUCuRvk7qU
有關星座的英文https://youtu.be/S2d1ZkuS3cc
有關姿勢的英文https://youtu.be/Y2XZphod3FA
那些年我們聽過的電影歌曲https://youtu.be/PYZWlkZJB70
2018年梗圖繞口令https://youtu.be/CKos1k7YxAA
跟名人偉人有關的英文https://youtu.be/k7bPK3TzS64
跟發明有關的英文https://youtu.be/1w79AZjDNlc
大聯盟有幾支球隊https://youtu.be/Nuxh_3VgtQY
蒟蒻學歷史系列影片~
國務卿是什麼東西https://youtu.be/biyoj7f1ad8
美國的菸酒文化https://youtu.be/94hycBUDGn4
種族歧視背後的真相https://youtu.be/dpBo7NC1QDc
美國名字裡的秘密https://youtu.be/OqQzFJ_prvE
大家都誤解的美國歷史https://youtu.be/Z_Vc26-ao9g
感恩節的由來https://youtu.be/QkHq3_kfeag
可以合法嫖妓的地方https://youtu.be/13b4DcKmiTA
南北內戰的由來https://youtu.be/O4SwEfwSJy4
美國文化冷知識https://youtu.be/9F55jLPex_E
蒟蒻碎碎念系列影片~
何謂薪資透明化運動https://youtu.be/kFveqhy1qgw
為什麼左撇子比較聰明https://youtu.be/M0SVWeXH6Rw
黑人為什麼那麼笨https://youtu.be/UQ-Lsi4YoeU
台灣有多少外國人https://youtu.be/W6vOy993DM0
誰跟你說我種族歧視https://youtu.be/bYp2ibXQ97U
古代人為什麼那麼醜https://youtu.be/TK5151v5soY
川普沒有你想的那麼笨https://youtu.be/ThE1dveZd0I
黑人白人犯罪率大車拚https://youtu.be/ZYNhLOLoimA
5分鐘讓你了解摩門教 https://youtu.be/fOqeKKJP1nM
蒟蒻聊感情系列影片~
如何找適合你的伴侶https://youtu.be/kDfshMFsoQ4
如何搞一夜情https://youtu.be/lQBiOZ7X2eU
如何讓他丟掉前女友的遺物https://youtu.be/PL0P9ns-Gkg
為什麼男人該去結紮https://youtu.be/KsdNS2oTm10
為什麼愛情有兩年魔咒https://youtu.be/qX0rX2ir0A0
老外在台灣怎麼把妹https://youtu.be/4Os-FXhBgJc
為什麼美女反而容易晚婚https://youtu.be/-7OF_NzU1QY
老外的審美標準在哪裡https://youtu.be/bQlkC9Aa7eg
什麼樣的男人會家暴https://youtu.be/8pzqnQq_8IE
如何挑選適合的男朋友 https://youtu.be/Fd9bua8DWVg
感謝各位的支持,蒟蒻的影片才能越做越好
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/f5922/f592290672542b53cbac66b85e4dd628cb0bb470" alt="post-title"
quarter past ten 在 Telling the Time for Kids (Quarter Past, Half Past, Quarter To) 的八卦
... <看更多>