hong kong post address的八卦，Yahoo名人娛樂都在討論

國際黃媒黑記對監警會報告形容詞系列：
"Exonerates"（開脫）、"Dimming"（淡化）、"Whitewash"（洗白）
（所謂「香港的真相」全世界都唔多認同囉）

其實都唔洗睇報告內容，一睇個「格仔人」後面個Backdrop都知個報告嘅前設係咩，坦白講，唔知有幾多個香港人會對呢份嘢有一絲期望？不過咁，睇黎外國嘅黃媒黑記對香港好有心，所以今日空羣出動報導同評論內容，不過標題同內容離不開都係嗰幾個形容詞："Exonerates"（開脫）、"Dimming"（淡化）、"Whitewash"（洗白），哎喲，早知係咁，不如詐儍扮懵，博全世界唔記得唔出算啦....

事不宜遲，大家一齊睇下全地球各大黃媒黑記嘅報導：

《The Washington Post》：https://wapo.st/2WYGbNc
Hong Kong watchdog absolves police over protest crackdown, dimming prospects of accountability（淡化責任）

//“Everywhere you go, the problem isn’t necessarily that the police do things wrong. They do things wrong everywhere,” said Clifford Stott//
（辭職唔做報告嘅國際專家Clifford Stott話「無論邊個角度睇，問題唔一定係警察做錯啲嘢嘢，重點係佢地做乜都係錯。」）

《TIME》：https://bit.ly/2LtlfbM
Hong Kong’s Police Watchdog Largely Exonerates Officers （為警察開脫）and Blames Protesters

//It also repeatedly blamed the protesters for instigating the police response, almost appearing to suggest the demonstrators were also an organized entity trusted with the power to use lethal force to uphold the law.//
（份報告重複咁指責示威者煽動啲警察，彷彿暗示啲示威者係一個組織，相信用致命武力彰顯法律咁。）

《The Telegrpah》：https://bit.ly/3bI1ckF
Hong Kong police probe defends officers right to use force

//A long-awaited watchdog report investigating complaints against the Hong Kong police on Friday largely exonnerated officers’ use of force during last year’s turbulent pro-democracy protests and concluded that the Chinese-ruled city appeared to be getting dragged into an “era of terrorism.”//
（等到都頸長關於投訴香港警察嘅監察報告，星期五終於出咗黎，主力係為警察响上年民主抗爭運動中嘅所為開脫。結論係話呢個「中國管治」嘅城市好似跌咗入「恐怖主義時代」咁。）

《The Guardian》：https://bit.ly/2LxSIBL
Anger as Hong Kong watchdog clears police over protest response

//Stott also posted a George Orwell quote to Twitter and said: “it would seem the release of the IPCC report is part of a wider set of coordinated announcements designed to deliver the new ‘truth’.”//
（國際專家用《1984》作者嘅金句評論：「睇黎呢份監警會報告，就等如香港宣告要定立一套設計咗嘅「新真相」。」）

《BBC》：https://bbc.in/3fStsUG
Hong Kong protests: Police watchdog clears officers over crackdown

//The IPCC did not address allegations of misconduct against individual officers during months of unrest, during which more than 8,000 protestors were arrested.//
（個報告連一個警察嘅失職都無提及過，但係咁多個月黎就有8000個示威者被捕。）

《DW News》：https://bit.ly/2zHdkoF
Hong Kong protests: Watchdog clears police of wrongdoing

//Legitimacy in question
Hong Kong leader Carrie Lam described the report as "objective" and "fact-based" during a press conference...However, even before the report's release, experts had cast doubt on its neutrality.//
（（份報告）有合法性問題：雖然香港特首形容個報告係「客觀」同「根據事實」，不過份報告未出之前，啲國際專家已經好懷疑份嘢嘅中立性。）

《AL Jazeera》：https://bit.ly/2LynOsY
Hong Kong police watchdog to release report on protest response

//Credibility questioned：
Anthony Neoh, head of the police watchdog, has said the report did not investigate allegations of misconduct against individual officers.

The credibility of the investigation was dealt a blow in December when a panel of five foreign experts quit from advisory roles to the watchdog because of doubts about its "independent investigative capability".//
（可信性受質疑：
監警會主席話個報告無權去調查任何一個警員不當行為嘅投訴。事實上個機構嘅可信性响2019年12月，因為五個本來參與嘅外國專家辭職而爛晒，因為佢地質疑監警會嘅「獨立調查能力」。）

《France 24》（引述』法新社）：https://bit.ly/3fSQ4Vm
Hong Kong police watchdog clears force over protest response
（唔洗譯，自己參透，好L多" "例如"TRUTH"「直相」）
//Speaking in front of a backdrop filled with pictures of violent protests alongside the slogan "The Truth About Hong Kong" on Friday afternoon, Lam described the report as "comprehensive, objective, fact-based and very heavy-weighted".//

喂呀，英國、美國、法國、德國同中東嘅傳媒，曲或者直，明隊或者暗示，都無句好嘢講嘅？

埋黎睇下喇喂！國際都會呀！中立報告呀！「香港的真相」呀！

P.S. 咁扭曲嘅新聞要分咁多個報導睇咁L多次，仲要揾出撮要同大家分享，係咪覺得本人EQ好高，抗嘔能力好強呢？

#唔洗國際明眼人
#盲嘅都開眼睇得出

*********************************
支持Patreon係本Page嘅支柱：
https://www.patreon.com/goodbyehkhellouk
*********************************

This is food zombie, it must be our most cult video ever made. Anyone 18+ in HONG KONG who wishes to join us to the Zombieland movie marathon and watch the new sequel one week earlier than its release date, can leave us a comment in this Facebook post. We will inbox the winners and each winner will get 2 free tickets (Total of 35 winners).

1080 HD Link: https://youtu.be/NqcM9ypYAlI

呢套應該係我哋拍得最cult嘅片。任何18歳以上人士有興趣參與《喪屍樂園10周年電影馬拉松》同想早一個星期睇最新一集就請係Facebook Post留言，我哋會抽出35名得奬者 (每位會獲得2張戲票，共70張)，並會以inbox通知領取方法

活動詳情 Event Details:
日期 Date: 12th Oct (星期六 Saturday)
地點 Address: MOViE MOViE Cityplaza

得獎者會需要下午12 時30分起到MOViE MOViE Cityplaza 排隊取票 The winners will be required to arrive to the event at 12:30pm to pick up the tickets.

《喪屍樂園》(ZOMBIELAND)
時間:下午1時35分
片長: 88分鐘

《喪屍樂園: 連環屍殺》(ZOMBIELAND: DOUBLE TAP)
時間:下午3時20分
片長: 96分鐘

*只准18歲以上人士參加
*參加者必須出席兩場放映
* 如有任何爭議，SONY PICTURESHK保留最終決定權。

#Zombieland #doubletap #中二病 #童年回憶 #Fight #zombie #GamesEffect Sony Pictures
Games Effect Pixel Lo Chemain Lo Sheena Lo 6個點 哈嘯Chun Ho NG

蕭叔叔短評被譽為「人生有呢種朋友不枉此生」的黃仁龍那十頁紙求情信

全文：

http://m.mingpao.com/ins/instantnews/web_tc/article/20170220/s00001/1487583133001

（報章轉載錯漏不少，敬請留意）

I have known Mr Donald Tsang since 2005. As Secretary for Justice (SJ), I worked closely with Donald as Chief Executive (CE) between October 2005 and June 2012. In addition to official dealings, I consider Donald to be a good friend and someone I admire for his dedication to public service.

Donald's over 40 years of service and contribution to Hong Kong is a matter of public record. Others will speak to his key role in helping Hong Kong weather through stormy financial crises. Here I would refer to his significant contributions to the public based on my own personal experience particularly in the area of the rule of law in Hong Kong.

During my 7-year tenure as SJ, I had on numerous occasions tendered legal advice to Donald as CE. He would sometimes debate with me and test the basis of the advice; but he has never acted against such legal advice. This in itself is a remarkable attribute as the head of the HKSAR.

Donald always said to me the Governors he previously worked with, however headstrong, would always abide by the legal advice of the Attorney General, and it is important that the CE of the HKSAR should stay that way.

Congo Case

One of the most important tasks, if not the most important task, of the CE of HKSAR is to faithfully and effectively implement the principle of “one country, two systems.” The power of the Standing Committee of the National People’s Congress (NPCSC) to interpret the Basic Law and its exercise have always been considered a major challenge to the post-1997 constitutional order.

During my tenure as SJ, the NPCSC interpreted the Basic Law once in 2011. That was upon the reference by the Court of Final Appeal (CFA) on the question of state immunity. The issue in the case is whether the People’s Republic of China’s doctrine of absolute immunity (under which no foreign state can be sued in the court at all) should be followed in Hong Kong. Prior to 1997, Hong Kong’s common law provided for restrictive immunity, where foreign states could be sued if the dispute arouse out of commercial transactions.

The HKSAR Government lost in the Court of First Instance and in the Court of Appeal. If the Government were to lose again in the CFA, it could stir up serious political and economic repercussions for China particularly vis-à-vis her African friends. National interest of China was at stake. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs was understandably very concerned.

Immense political pressure mounted. There were suggestions that Beijing should not take any risk but should consider taking more definitive measures such as an interpretation of the Basic Law before the appeal was heard. If that were to happen, on the eve of the appeal hearing, the damage to judicial independence would not be less than an overriding post-judgment interpretation.

I cannot go into further details for confidentiality reasons. However, I can testify that Donald has been solid and staunch in endorsing my stance against any extra-judicial measure in view of its adverse impact on the rule of law.

Owing in no small part to Donald’s endorsement and resolve, the Central People’s Government (CPG) was content to trust the HKSAR Government and the CFA, and to leave the appeal to be heard by the highest court, despite grave risk and many conflicting views given by others. At the end, the Government won in the CFA by a majority of 3 to 2. The Court further referred the relevant Basic Law provisions to Beijing for interpretation, as required under Article 158 of the Basic Law, before pronouncing the final judgment. A huge constitutional crisis was warded off. The rule of law had prevailed.

Over this difficult episode, I know Donald had been under tremendous pressure. I remember often times he suffered from acute acid reflux before and after major discussions. Yet he stood firm throughout.

As CE, Donald had faithfully discharged the indispensable trust reposed by both the CPG and by Hong Kong. He had the courage to stand by what he believes to be right and the ability to address mutual concerns and to strengthen mutual understanding. He had performed well the crucial bridging role in the two-way process under “one country, two systems” at critical times.

Constitutional Reform

There was another important event in which Donald’s principled stance had been vital in achieving a favourable result for Hong Kong: constitutional reform.

Although no change could be made of the imminent 2017 CE election method due to the set-backs in 2016, during Donald’s tenure as CE, he has been made significant contributions toward moving Hong Kong closer to universal suffrage.

The first landmark was achieved, with tremendous efforts by the core team under Donald’s lead, when the NPCSC delivered its decision in December 2007 setting out “the timetable” and “road map” for universal suffrage in terms of the elections of CE and Legco.

Second, in 2010, the Government managed to secure Legco’s support to pass the 2012 constitutional reform package. Here, Donald had played a pivotal role, one perhaps not many are aware of.

Whether the 2012 reform package could be passed in 2010 was crucial to ensure “gradual and orderly progress” and that the next round (i.e. the intended goals of universal suffrage in electing CE in 2017) could be achieved.

In June 2010, the original government proposal was losing support and hope was vanishing for it to be passed at Legco. Time was running out. Whether to modify the package by incorporating a proposal of the Democratic Party (i.e. the additional 5 District Council Functional Constituency seats to be elected by over 3 million electorate, “the new DCFC election method”) appeared to be the lynchpin.

Without going into details again for confidentiality reasons, I can again testify that the make-or-break moment was when Donald made the timely and difficult decision to revise the package by incorporating the new DCFC election method. It was an agonizing decision for him as he had to override certain internal opposition and to risk personal credibility and trust before the CPG. As an insider, I know that decision was not a political manoeuvre but a selfless act for the sake of the long-term wellbeing of Hong Kong and the smooth transition toward universal suffrage.

Son of Hong Kong

Donald is truly a “son of Hong Kong” (香港仔). His genuine concern for the public good is most vividly demonstrated when Hong Kong was caught in crises of one kind of another.

Hong Kong went through attacks of avian flu and swine flu. Donald tirelessly headed the cross-bureau task forces and chaired long and intensive meetings. I remember more than once Donald being caught in very heated debates with colleagues, pushing them to the limit to mobilize maximum resources and manpower, in order to give the public maximum protection against these outbreaks. He would grill colleagues over thorny issues such as requisitioning hotels as places of quarantine, not satisfied with the usual civil service response of reluctance, as lives of many were at stake.

Over the Manila hostage incident in August 2010, Donald vigorously pressed the President of the Philippines for full investigation, joining the victims’ families and the rest of Hong Kong to cry for justice, although his action raised eyebrows as foreign affairs strictly is a matter of the CPG under Article 13 of the Basic Law.

Donald had a strong concern for young people. During my tenure, exceptionally I was commissioned to chair a Steering Committee to combat drug abuse by youth. The public might not realize this initiative in fact came from Donald. He was deeply concerned and alarmed by the reports reflecting the seriousness of the problem. He was determined to tackle the problem pro-actively. The Steering Committee was unprecedented, involving concerted and strategic efforts of different departments and bureaus. More importantly, Donald was instrumental in putting in substantial and sustainable resources to strengthen the efforts. The figures of reported drug abusers, particularly among young abusers, have seen significant decline in the past few years.

Other contributions on the rule of law

There was no shortage of controversial cases involving judicial reviews and fundamental human rights. Amidst other voices and political pressure, Donald had fully taken on board the legal position that the Government has a positive duty to protect such rights, including taking reasonable and appropriate measures to enable lawful demonstrations to take place peacefully.

Further, Donald also readily took on my advice regarding procedural fairness in handling Government businesses with quasi-judicial element such as administrative appeals.

Donald truly believes in judicial independence. He assured me repeatedly the independent and internationally renowned Judiciary in the HKSAR is our pride and the cornerstone of our success. His personal commitment to this cause is manifested in his positive response in acceding to many recommendations of the Mason Report endorsed by the Standing Committee on Judicial Salaries and Conditions of Service.

Furthermore, his conviction on the importance of the law as Hong Kong’s assets was amply manifested in his exceptional support in the development of Hong Kong’s capacity as an international arbitration centre. Donald was very understanding on the need of expansion on this front and had put in personal efforts to make it happen. He was instrumental in enabling resources are in place to secure additional space for the Hong Kong International Arbitration Centre, and to procure the arbitration arm of the International Chamber of Commerce and the China International Economic and Trade Arbitration Commission to set up regional offices in Hong Kong.

A fair man who has given much to the public

Before joining the Government, I was an Election Committee member of the Legal Subsector elected on the same ticket as Ms Audrey Eu, Mr Alan Leong and other vocal barristers. In that capacity, in 2005, I first met Donald in an election forum where I questioned him harshly and criticised the Government’s earlier attitude over certain rule of law issues. Instead of bearing any grudge, in the late summer of 2005, Donald invited me to take up the post as SJ, assuring me that he would give me full support in upholding the rule of law in Hong Kong. That quality of fairness in Donald and that personal assurance to me have never slackened in the following 7 years in which I served in his cabinet.

As CE of the HKSAR, Donald had truly poured himself out. I strongly believe his significant contributions to Hong Kong in the past over 4 decades should be properly recognized.

Dated the 20th day of Februray 2017.

Wong Yan Lung SC

- See more at: http://m.mingpao.com/ins/instantnews/web_tc/article/20170220/s00001/1487583133001#sthash.0nwGN3QA.dpuf

This is food zombie, it must be our most cult video ever made. Anyone 18+ in HONG KONG who wishes to join us to the Zombieland movie marathon and watch the new sequel one week earlier than its release date, can leave us a comment in this Facebook post. We will inbox the winners and each winner will get 2 free tickets (Total of 35 winners).

呢套應該係我哋拍得最cult嘅片。任何18歳以上人士有興趣參與《喪屍樂園10周年電影馬拉松》同想早一個星期睇最新一集就請係Facebook Post留言，我哋會抽出35名得奬者 (每位會獲得2張戲票，共70張)，並會以inbox通知領取方法

活動詳情 Event Details:
日期 Date: 12th Oct (星期六 Saturday)
地點 Address: MOViE MOViE Cityplaza

得獎者會需要下午12 時30分起到MOViE MOViE Cityplaza 排隊取票 The winners will be required to arrive to the event at 12:30pm to pick up the tickets.

《喪屍樂園》(ZOMBIELAND)
時間:下午1時35分
片長: 88分鐘

《喪屍樂園: 連環屍殺》(ZOMBIELAND: DOUBLE TAP)
時間:下午3時20分
片長: 96分鐘

*只准18歲以上人士參加
*參加者必須出席兩場放映
* 如有任何爭議，SONY PICTURESHK保留最終決定權。

#Zombieland #doubletap #中二病 #童年回憶 #Fight #zombie #GamesEffect #Sony Pictures

►►► Facebook Page: http://www.facebook.com/gameseffect
►►►Twitter ツイッター: https://mobile.twitter.com/GamesEffect1
►►►Instagram インスタ: https://www.instagram.com/gameseffectofficial
Support us by LIKE and SUBSCRIBE!

Hello everyone!

Today's vlog:
The Classical Music game (TRY IT!!!!)
Our FAIL attempt doing the posh English accent,
Domo wants up!
Our PO Box address,
SAY GOODNIGHT!
Package from Kandeejohnon


It took me years to decide to release a PO Box. It's just because I always felt like you guys have done more than enough for me already. We are humbled so many of you want to write to us. I can't wait to read your letters!

Write to me here at:

Lindy Tsang
P.O. Box 2093
Yuen Long Post Office
Hong Kong



Ps. Being born and bred from UK, we are very aware that there are many many many accents. We were attempting more of the posh british accent rather than implying this is how the British accent should sound. Just a little heads up ^_^.

Love Bubz, Tim, Chubbi & Domo xox


Connect with me:
MY WEBSITE: http://www.bubzbeauty.com
TWITTER: http://www.twitter.com/bubzbeauty
INSTAGRAM: http://www.instagram.com/itsbubz
FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/itsbubz
SHOP: http://www.shopbubbi.com

Not sponsored
GIVEAWAY WINNER: KATRINA CHAN - katrinakaikaikai@gmail.com

♦ Instagram: bethniy
♦ Twitter: http://www.twitter.com/bethniy
♦ Facebook - http://facebook.com/bethniblog
♦ VLOG Channel - http://www.youtube.com/bethnivlogs

♦IG SHOP: @BEAUTYBRICKSCOM

♦ Official BLOG
http://www.bethni.com

♦ Google+
http://www.google.com/+bethni

Inquiries: info@bethni.com
PO BOX:
PO BOX 218, TAI PO POST OFFICE, TAI PO, N.T, HONG KONG

May contain affiliate links.

Sulwhasoo Perfecting Cushion #21 Medium Pink
$430 (購自香港機場DFS)

Giveaway Rules:
1. 留言留你想同我講嘅說話，video ideas etc. － 每日只可留言一次 否則留言會被刪除而不另行通知
2. 留埋email address方便我聯絡得獎者
3. This giveaway is international!
4. 得獎者會在下星期 1月8號在我的instagram - @BETHNIY 公佈
5. 1月7號12:00am 截止
This giveaway is not sponsored by or affiliated with Kikki K. I bought the planner with my own money for this giveaway.

♦ Disclosure:
I get sent products from time to time to review or to share with you all. These products are marked with an *.
I am in no obligation to "sell" these products nor to review them in a positive light. I am to select the products I feel are related to my channel and to review them for you (the viewer) and to provide my honest feedback to the brand(s) for further product development/analytics.
From time to time I am invited to collaborate with brands where I am financially paid to publish sponsored content. All sponsored content will be marked as such (Ad/Sponsored in video title and info box) and will be reviewed in the same way as non-sponsored/self-purchased products. Opinions cannot be bought and reviews cannot be masked.