在面對性侵案件時,「不責備受害者」是大家努力推動的目標。而「女性衣著和性侵無關」,似乎也已成了政治正確的說法。
但是,若單從科學證據的角度來看,過去的研究中到底有沒有發現「女性衣著和性侵被害」之間的相關性呢?(在熟人性侵與權力性侵案例中,衣著可能關係不大,但是在陌生人隨機性侵案例中,衣著也仍然沒有影響嗎?)
稍微搜索文獻之後,發現證據確實很少,但並不是沒有,比方說這一篇研究就發現,女性受到性侵害的其中一個相關因子就是「衣著」:
Synovitz LB, Byrne TJ. (1998) Antecedents of sexual victimization: factors discriminating victims from nonvictims. J Am Coll Health. 46(4):151-8.
原文引用: "The variables found to be related to women's being sexually victimized were (a) number of different lifetime sexual partners, (b) provocative dress, and (c) alcohol use."
還有以下這一篇更是讓人跌破眼鏡,研究竟然發現男性可以透過女性的一些動作與外表,來判斷女性的「被動」或「服從」程度,而「穿著」就是可以用來判斷「被動」或「服從」程度的一個關鍵:有較高的「被動」和「服從」傾向的女性,通常會穿得比較保守。
因此有學者推論,歹徒如果看穿這一點,反而會使得這些穿著保守的女性成為下手目標。相反的,穿著暴露性感的女性,則會被視為「不順從」而成為反指標,反而較不易成為性侵目標。
Theresa M. Beiner, Sexy Dressing Revisited: Does Target Dress Play A Part in Sexual Harassment Cases?, 14 Duke J. Gender L. & Pol'y 125 (2007).
PDF: https://scholarship.law.duke.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1109&context=djglp
原文引用:"While people perceive dress to have an impact on who is assaulted, studies of rapists suggest that victim attire is not a significant factor. Instead, rapists look for signs of passiveness and submissiveness, which, studies suggest, are more likely to coincide with more body-concealing clothing.(140) In a study to test whether males could determine whether women were high or low in passiveness and submissiveness, Richards and her colleagues found that men, using only nonverbal appearance cues, could accurately assess which women were passive and submissive versus those who were dominant and assertive.(141) Clothing was one of the key cues: “Those females high in passivity and submissiveness (i.e., those at greatest risk for victimization) wore noticeably more body-concealing clothing (i.e., high necklines, long pants and sleeves, multiple layers).” This suggests that men equate body-concealing clothing with passive and submissive qualities, which are qualities that rapists look for in victims. Thus, those who wore provocative clothes would not be viewed as passive or submissive, and would be less likely to be victims of assault."
References:
140. Chen Shen, Study: From Attribution and Thought-Process Theory to Rape-Shield Laws: The Meanings of Victim’s Appearance in Rape Trials, 5 J. L. & FAM. STUD. 435, 447 (2003); Alinor C. Sterling, Undressing the Victim: The Intersection of Evidentiary and Semiotic Meanings of Women’s Clothing in Rape Trials, 7 YALE J.L. & FEMINISM 87, 104–06 (1995); DUNCAN KENNEDY, SEXY DRESSING ETC. (1993); Gary D. Lafree, Barbara F. Reskin & Christy A. Visher, Jurors’ Responses to Victims’ Behavior and Legal Issues in Sexual Assault Trials, 32 SOC.PROBS. 389, 401 (1985) (study of jurors in rape trials noting that victim history often finds its way into rape trials in spite of rape shield laws).
141. Lynne Richards, A Theoretical Analysis of Nonverbal Communication and Victim Selection for Sexual Assaults, 9 CLOTHING & TEXTILES RES. J. 55, 59–60 (Summer 1991) (discussing Lynne Richards et al., Perceptions of Submissiveness: Implications for Victimization, 125 J.PSYCH. 407 (1991)).
臆測:
(1) 雖然統計上很少發現「女性衣著和性侵被害」兩者的顯著相關,但是這似乎有可能是因為臨時起意的性侵案件占全部性侵案件的比例太小,導致樣本被稀釋而無法檢視「女性衣著和性侵被害」兩者的相關性?
(2) 如果男性可以從女性穿著推測出女性的個性,那性感衣著反而會成為反指標,使得穿著保守的女性更容易變成目標,如此一來,「女性性感衣著和性侵被害機率」兩者當然不會有正相關。
結論:兩者關係仍待驗證,切勿過早論斷。
同時也有2部Youtube影片,追蹤數超過267萬的網紅Rachel and Jun,也在其Youtube影片中提到,★Cat Merch! https://crowdmade.com/collections/junskitchen - Resources for statistics/news/reports on gender equality in both English and Japanese: 日...
feminism article 在 蔡依橙的閱讀筆記 Facebook 八卦
上個月中國封掉女權討論區的新聞,我本來沒什麼關心,想說中國封殺什麼不是都很正常嗎?
但這篇端的分析讓我發現,其實這個不是扼殺女權,這是扼殺自由。
因為這些女權小組的訴求並不是針對體制,而是針對自己,連這樣也不行耶。
看來中國是打算規範所有的女性,只能有相夫教子的言論,這種反對自己成為生育機器的自身修為,是不准討論的。
「在此需要特別解釋的是6b4t,一個從韓國女權處借鑑過來的概念。
6b指:不和男人結婚、不和男人戀愛、不和男人發生性行為、不和男性生育、不消費厭女辱女品牌、單身女性互助不與已婚女性互助。
4t指:脱束身衣、脱宗教、脱偶像、脱宅脱腐。
簡而言之就是通過避開戀愛、婚姻等父權制框架下的異性關係,以避免遭受對女性的剝削,同時形成單女互助以補償親密關係的缺失。」
「耐人尋味的是,6b4t的主張雖然因為偏離傳統的社會框架而被歸類為激進,但落實在具體的行動中卻是不具備任何「破壞力」的。
6b4t不對修改法律有任何訴求,也沒有像幾年前的行動派那樣有任何發起線下行動的意圖。
相比之下,豆瓣上有關爭取冠姓權、爭取平等的就業機會或男性對女性的惡性暴力事件的貼文,即使有「挑動男女對立」的厭男傾向和對現存制度的不滿,也一概沒有被刪除。」
「主張6b4t的激進女權所討論的內容更多圍繞」自身「而非」社會「,姿態是「拒絕」而非「爭取」——畢竟,一旦破解了戀愛與婚姻的敘事、完全脱離男性,温和派女權在和男性伴侶的零和遊戲中所需要爭取的冠姓權、家務勞動均分便不存在了;脱離了擇偶的語境,男性凝視和病態審美標準也很難再成為需要費力掙脱的枷鎖。」
豆瓣突然封殺多個女權主義小組
https://udn.com/news/story/7332/5386083
被污名化的激進女權?——關於豆瓣激進女權的五個誤解
https://theinitium.com/article/20210503-opinion-douban-radical-feminism/
feminism article 在 Xiaxue Facebook 八卦
Reposting a snippet from my latest blog post, you can read the full article here: http://xiaxue.blogspot.com/2020/07/raeesah-khan-ge-2020-and-being-labeled.html?m=1
I’m posting more about Raeesah Khan today.
First, a disclaimer. I do not dislike the Worker’s Party.
Of all the opposition parties, I think they are the best. I live in Aljunied grc, and they have done a great job so far. I agree with many of the policy suggestions in their manifesto.
For example, redundancy insurance, abolishing the retirement age, or lowering the age of eligibility for BTO flats, which will help singles and our LGBTQ community to get housing just like married couples are.
Previously I mentioned on my ig stories that Raeesah Khan is not suitable to be an MP.
Today I am going to ask some very important questions which I hope both WP and Raeesah will answer.
I refer to this tweet by Raeesah in the photos.
It appears that she is saying her political views can be summed up by
- Angela Davis’ political views
- Intersectional feminism
Many of you may not know about Angela Davis, but she is a far-left activist, who spent her life sympathising with some of the most oppressive communism regimes around.
She literally calls herself a communist, and was a member of the Communism Party in USA. I think there is no need to explain how horrible communism is.
And of course in order to make any non-communist country a communist state, it would involve total revolution, many lives, and replacing it with a totalitarian regime in charge of redistributing wealth back to its citizens.
She is also a prison abolitionist, campaigning for prisons to completely be eradicated. Where to put the murderers, I can’t seem to find a good answer, because it seems she also is against the death penalty.
Angela Davis was a member of the Black Panthers, a brutal communist, anti-semite organization. In 1970, Angela Davis bought the weapons that were used for a shootout during a trial of 3 black inmates accused of killing a white prison guard. All the black men and judge who was held hostage perished in the gunfight, and Davis fled the state. She was eventually caught.
Even though she conspired to commit murder, the jury found her not guilty.
In short, this woman is the antithesis to the Singapore that Mr Lee Kuan Yew wanted.
This tweet of Raeesah Khan’s talking about Angela Davis was posted only a few weeks ago, but surprisingly enough, nobody is talking about it.
Anyone who knows who Angela Davis is should be horror-filled that a candidate running for parliament is a fan of hers, and claims that the reading of her books represents her political views.
Previously I mentioned Raeesah appears to be one of those radical leftists who seem hell bent on bringing the toxic, cancerous identity politics that America is so notorious for into Singapore.
There are racial issues that minorities face in Singapore, of course there is. It is tough to be a minority in any country.
But instead of discussing calmly and logically what new politics can be introduced to solve these problems or what laws need to change, proponents of Identity politics instead try to make a single race the enemy.
When there are enemies, people unite. Political parties using this method will see themselves get votes if they manage to market themselves as the empathetic ones, even if the politics they impose do more evil than good in the long run.
Society is then split into a them vs us, while tribalistic infighting ensue. If you disagree with this method of classifying victims by their skin colour (when in fact so many things determine a person’s privilege, such as looks, height, family wealth, health, both parents around etc etc), you are automatically seen as racist and the bad guy.
Because nobody wants to seem morally corrupt or unsympathetic, they prop up this system.
Instill this sentiment into citizens long enough and resentment builds. The ones constantly told they are being oppressed will start seeing oppression everywhere. They won’t even try to succeed in life, because they are told they are so oppressed they can never make it. They believe their oppressors owe them.
Meanwhile, the majority race starts feeling angry at constantly being called oppressors. Or maybe they are poor and unhappy themselves, but see that resources for help are only made available for minorities but not them. If they were indeed racist before, this makes them even more racist.
What eventually happens is civil war. We cannot have this poison in Singapore.
Raeesah’s has apologised for her posts, but nobody needed to hear whether she is sorry she was being insensitive.
What people need to know is:
Does she still believe our courts are corrupt as she so insinuated? Does she still believe law enforcement unfairly target minorities? If not, what made her change her mind? Her statement does not address any of this.
Worker’s Party claim they did not see those posts of Raeesah’s. Fair enough. But I do not believe they have done such terrible vetting that they have not seen her tweet about Angela Davis which was so recent.
I wish to ask Raeesah Khan, DO YOU DISAVOW ANGELA DAVIS’ POLITICAL VIEWS?
- Do you believe that Singapore, through a brutal revolution and death, can become a communist utopia?
- Do you think that everyone in Singapore should not own private property and should have equal wealth, the very values communism epouses? If so, do you seek to redistribute your multi-millionaire dad's wealth to the poverty-stricken citizens of Singapore?
- Do you agree that it is only with violence and death do we achieve true freedom?
- Do you seek to abolish prisons in Singapore?
- Do you believe in the ideologies of Karl Marx, or Valdamir Lenin?
As for Worker’s Party, why did you field a candidate who holds extreme left-wing views?
Do you agree with her ideologies and think it aligns with yours? DO YOU ENDORSE THESE FAR LEFT VIEWS??
Please answer these questions. I write all these not because I am a PAP lackey, even though obviously people will say I am. Despite what you think, I believe it is healthy to have opposition seats in parliament.
However, I absolutely do not want to see candidates such as Raeesah Khan in our parliament - she brings with her dangerous political views that can topple the peaceful society we built over the years and is completely against everything that Singapore stands for. As it is, the mindless youth of Singapore are already echoing her dangerous ideologies.
I would rather any opposition joker win than her.
feminism article 在 Rachel and Jun Youtube 的評價
★Cat Merch! https://crowdmade.com/collections/junskitchen
- Resources for statistics/news/reports on gender equality in both English and Japanese:
日本語:
「世界男女格差指数」:
http://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E4%B8%9...
http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_NR_G...
「厚生労働省の統計情報・白書」: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei_hakusho/
「男女共同参画白書 平成25年版」 : http://www.gender.go.jp/about_danjo/w...
「保育所関連状況取りまとめ」: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/stf/houdou/2r98...
「夫は祖手で働き、妻は家を守るべきである」: http://www.gender.go.jp/about_danjo/w...
「男性の育児休業取得率の推移 」: http://www.gender.go.jp/about_danjo/w...
「役職別管理職に占める女性割合の推移 」: http://www.gender.go.jp/about_danjo/w...
「週労働時間60時間以上の就業者の割合(男性・年齢別)」: http://www.gender.go.jp/about_danjo/w...
English:
Global Gender Gap Report 2012: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Gend...
Ministry of Health, Labour, and Welfare: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/
MHLW's Equal Employment and Child Welfare Report: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/english/wp/wp-h...
Japanese work week [article]: http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013...
Japanese daycare issues [article]:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2013...
Gender Equality Bureau Cabinet Office of Japan, "Women and Men in Japan 2012" report: http://www.gender.go.jp/english_conte...
Perceptions of Gender Equality survey results: http://www.gender.go.jp/english_conte...
Women want to work [articles]:
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2012...
http://www.japantimes.co.jp/opinion/2...
Center for Work-Life Policy Press Report on Japanese women workers: http://www.worklifepolicy.org/documen...
OECD Employment Outlook 2013 (Gender gap wage information): http://www.keepeek.com/Digital-Asset-...
★ Patreon! http://patreon.com/rachelandjun
Greek subtitles thanks to: Λιλιαν Τσιουτσια
Spanish (Mexico) subtitles thanks to: Eduardo Lugo (GagaBabymetal)
Want to help us subtitle our videos?
http://www.youtube.com/timedtext_vide...
【You can also find us:】
×Gaming channel: http://www.youtube.com/user/Racheland...
×Extra videos: http://www.youtube.com/user/Racheland...
×Jun's Kitchen: http://www.youtube.com/user/JunsKitchen
×Twitch: http://www.twitch.tv/rachelandjun/pro...
×Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/RachelAndJun
×Twitter: https://twitter.com/RachelAndJun
×Instagram: http://instagram.com/rachelandjun
×Our blog: http://rachelandjun.blogspot.com/
feminism article 在 Xiaxue Youtube 的評價
This video was uploaded yesterday but it mysteriously got deleted, the error message says deleted by user. My account is not hacked and I have two step verification. I don't know if it's gone because it's an unpopular opinion or whatever but hey let's see if it gets deleted again. -_-
Some links:
Breastfeeding article: https://www.facebook.com/Xiaxue.sg/posts/10155214365042431
Gender wage gap debunked: http://www.forbes.com/sites/karinagness/2016/04/12/dont-buy-into-the-gender-pay-gap-myth/
Other dumb modern feminist movements:
Mansplaining: https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mansplaining
Manspreading: http://www.gender-focus.com/2016/02/13/manspreading/
Fart rape (yes for real): https://thewaterpipe.wordpress.com/2013/12/22/can-a-fart-be-misogynist/
feminism article 在 Feminism is for everybody - The Lancet 的相關結果
Likewise, Sara Davies and colleagues argue that a feminist research agenda is key to advancing gender equality in global health, and ... ... <看更多>
feminism article 在 What feminism means today - American Psychological ... 的相關結果
Gomez: It's being who you are-being the woman that you are, without fears of judgment or a joke. It's being successful, not in a materialistic way, but in the ... ... <看更多>
feminism article 在 feminism | Definition, History, Types, Waves, Examples, & Facts 的相關結果
Feminism, the belief in social, economic, and political equality of the sexes. ... In the first feminist article she dared sign with her own name, ... ... <看更多>