daily price action的八卦，YOUTUBE、PINTEREST和Yahoo名人娛樂都在討論

𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓'𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐏𝐑𝐈𝐌𝐀𝐑𝐘 𝐓𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐃𝐔𝐑𝐈𝐍𝐆 𝐂𝐎𝐕𝐈𝐃-𝟏𝟗 𝐂𝐎𝐑𝐎𝐍𝐀𝐕𝐈𝐑𝐔𝐒 𝐄𝐏𝐈𝐃𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐂 𝐑𝐈𝐆𝐇𝐓 𝐍𝐎𝐖?
.
At this moment, we really need to WORK TOGETHER to fight the epidemic. BUT we really need a very clear goal and to identify what is the KEY PRIORITY ACTION.
.
Recently, the media are reporting on the problem of the price hike for face masks, the national police urged the people to stay at home, and the number of confirmed cases published daily by the Ministry of Health (half transparent), and so on.
.
HOWEVER, will the people be convinced by these kind of steps❓
.
𝐖𝐇𝐘 𝐂𝐇𝐈𝐍𝐀 𝐒𝐄𝐀𝐋𝐄𝐃 𝐎𝐅𝐅 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐂𝐈𝐓𝐘
.
Once China discovered the COVID-19 epidemic, they immediately sealed off the city. The purpose is to find the SOURCE OF THE EPIDEMIC as fast as possible so as to IDENTIFY the RANGE OF SPREAD and ROUTE of the epidemic during this lock down period to minimize the risk.
.
Although the Malaysian government has been little slow in taking action, however the official has implemented the control of state-ordered operations. But is it the people of the country will be safe just by STAYING AT HOME?
.
In this context, our country should be grateful because the source of most of the confirmed cases in our country is already IDENTIFIED.
.
But the strange thing is while the government knew that there are still 4,000 people who have not yet gone to the hospital for examination and isolation, on the other hand keep reminding the citizens not to go out and stay at home. Isn't this just like persuading 30 million people across Malaysia to fight with these 4,000 people. I am most concern that these 4,000 people do not know where there will be a third outbreak. In fact, the ultimate victim of this is the citizens
.
𝐖𝐇𝐀𝐓 𝐑𝐎𝐋𝐄 𝐃𝐎𝐄𝐒 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐆𝐎𝐕𝐄𝐑𝐍𝐌𝐄𝐍𝐓 𝐏𝐋𝐀𝐘 𝐈𝐍 𝐓𝐇𝐄 𝐄𝐍𝐃?

Thanks to the people's cooperation at home? And then blame these 4,000 people for slowly appearing for the test and cause the spread of the epidemic?
.
Actually, in order to persuade these 4,000 people to go to the hospital for check out, the theory is the same as persuading a child. You can only use either of the way as below：

1) Mandatory use of the highest criminal law, such as the use of the army to search.
.
2) To deal with the exchange of T&C
Among these 4,000 people, the reason they don't turn out might be because some of them are foreign workers. Yes, they might be worrying of repatriation.
In order to make sure they turn out for testing and isolation, government should give the promise to them that as long as they turn out for testing, other matter can be discussed.
.
Because currently, the most critical matter is not whether they are foreign worker or not, but is the safety of all citizens, including: our leaders, government servants, citizens & etc.
.
Let's look for these 4,000 people together agrressively regardless of your status, which party you come from, government or private sector or organization.
.
At this moment, the government should stop doing something that shouldn't be the priority. The hike of the price of face mask and report every day on how hard the police are patrolling is not the priority. The priority is how to identify and seek for these 4,000 people as the citizens are waiting for the updated news of these 4,000 people !!
.
Thanks.
.
𝑯𝒐𝒑𝒆𝒇𝒖𝒍𝒍𝒚, 𝒂𝒇𝒕𝒆𝒓 14 𝒅𝒂𝒚𝒔, 𝒘𝒆 𝒂𝒍𝒍 𝒄𝒂𝒏 𝒓𝒆𝒎𝒂𝒊𝒏 𝒐𝒖𝒓 𝒅𝒂𝒊𝒍𝒚 𝒍𝒊𝒇𝒆 𝒔𝒂𝒇𝒆𝒍𝒚.

~ Master WeiXuan
(Translated from Mandarin)

Muhyiddin Yassin
DR ADHAM BABA

Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad
Anwar Ibrahim
Dr Wan Azizah Wan Ismail
Lim Kit Siang (林吉祥)

The Star
NST Online
Sinar Harian
MELODY

黃浩銘：

//法官閣下，我能夠參與雨傘運動，爭取民主，實是毫無悔意，畢生榮幸。我已花了最青春的10年在社會運動上，假若我有80歲，我仍有50年可以與港人同行，繼續奮鬥。要是法官不信，且即管以刑罰來考驗我的意志，試煉我的決心，希望我的戰友們在我囚禁的時候，可以激發愛心，勉勵行善，更加有勇氣和力量作個真誠的人對抗謊言治國的中共政權。

　　「希望在於人民，改變始於抗爭」，唯有透過群眾力量，直接行動，才能改變社會。8年前如是，今日亦如是。但願港人堅定不移，爭取民主，打倒特權，彰顯公義。自由萬歲！民主社會主義萬歲！願公義和慈愛的　主耶穌基督與我同在，與法官先生同在，與香港人同在！//

希望在於人民　改變始於抗爭
—雨傘運動公眾妨擾案陳情書

陳法官仲衡閣下：

　　自2011年你審理只有23歲的我，追問時任特首曾蔭權知否米貴涉擾亂公眾秩序的案件距今已有8年。在命運的安排下，我再次站在你面前，只是當你讀到這封陳情書的時候，我已經不是當年被你宣判無罪釋放的年青人，而是一個準備迎接第三次入獄的積犯。然而，今天我不是尋求你的憐憫，而是希望道明我參與雨傘運動，公民抗命的緣由，讓法官閣下可以從我的動機及行為來給予合理判刑。

　　8年以來，我們的崗位稍有轉變，但香港的變化更大，充滿爭議的各個大白象基建均已落成，更多旅客走訪社區，似是一片繁華景象，但同時，更多窮人住在劏房，更多群眾走上街頭，亦有更多我們愛惜的年青人進入監牢。從前我們認為香港不會發生的事，都一一在這8年間發生了。當我8年前站在你面前那一刻，我們都不會想像得到香港人可被挾持返大陸，亦想像不到原來有一天大陸的執法人員可在香港某地方正當執法，更想像不到中共政府除了透過人大釋法外，還可藉著「一言九鼎」的人大決定，甚至中央公函來決定香港人的前途命運和收緊憲制權利。

爭取民主的本意

　　民主只是口號嗎？當年，我痛罵無視100萬窮人及30萬貧窮長者利益，卻慶祝不知辛亥革命本意的前行政長官曾蔭權，並要求設立全民退休保障，廢除強積金，因此首次被捕被控。但時至今日，香港仍然有過百萬貧窮人口，超過30萬貧窮長者，貧富懸殊及房屋短缺的問題愈加嚴重。2014年，我見過一位75歲的伯伯跪在立法會公聽會向時任勞工及福利局局長張建宗下跪，懇求政府不要拆遷古洞石仔嶺安老院。2019年，我又見到一位67歲執紙皮維生的婆婆在立法會公聽會哭訴難以找工作，現任勞工及福利局局長羅致光竟然叫她找勞工處。為何官員如此冷酷無情？為何我們的意見均未能影響政府施政？歸根結柢，就是因為香港人沒有真正的選擇，喪失本來應有制訂政策及監督的權力！

　　所謂民主，就是人民當家作主。任何施政，應當由人民倡議監督，公義分配，改善公共服務，使得貧者脫貧，富者節約。今日香港，顧全大陸，官商勾結，貧富懸殊，耗資千億的大白象跨境基建接踵而來，但當遇見護士猝死，教師自殺，老人下跪，政府政策就只有小修小補，小恩小惠，試問如何服眾？由1966年蘇守忠、盧麒公民抗命反對天星小輪加價，乃至1967年暴動及1989年中國愛國民主運動，甚至2003年反廿三條大遊行，無不是因政權專政，政策傾斜，分配不公，引致大規模民眾反抗。2014年雨傘運動的起點，亦是如此。

　　多年來，港人爭取民主，為求有公義分配，有尊嚴生活，有自主空間，但我們得到的是甚麼？1984年，中英兩國簽署《聯合聲明》前夕，前中共總書記趙紫陽曾回覆香港大學學生會要求「民主治港，普選特首」的訴求，清楚承諾「你們所說的『民主治港』是理所當然的」。當時，不少港人信以為真，誤以為回歸之後可得民主，但自1989年六四血腥鎮壓及2003年50萬人反對《廿三條》立法大遊行後，中共圖窮匕現，在2004年透過人大釋法收緊政制改革程序，並粗暴地決定2007及2008不會普選行政長官及立法會。自此，完全不民主的中國立法機關－全國人民代表大會常務委員會掌控香港人的命運福祉，人大釋法及人大決定可以隨時隨地配合極權政府的主張，命令香港法庭跟從，打壓香港的民主和法治。

　　2014年8月31日，是歷史的轉捩點。儘管多少溫和學者苦苦規勸，中共仍以6月的＜一國兩制白皮書＞為基礎，展示全面管治權的氣派，包括法官閣下在內，都要屈從愛國之說。在《8‧31人大決定》之後，中共完全暴露其假民主假普選的面目，其時，我們認為對抗方法就只有公民抗命。

公民抗命的起點

　　違法就是罪惡嗎？我們違法，稱之為「公民抗命」，就是公民憑良心為公眾利益，以非暴力形式不服從法律命令，以求改變不義制度或法律。終審法院非常任法官賀輔明（Leonard Hoffmann）勳爵曾在英國著名案例 R v Jones (Margaret) [2007] 1 AC 136 案提出：「發自良知的公民抗命，有着悠久及光榮的傳統。那些因着信念認為法律及政府行為是不義而違法的人，歷史很多時候都證明他們是正確的……能包容這種抗爭或示威，是文明社會的印記。」

　　終審法院在最近的公民廣場案（Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung (2018) 21 HKCFAR 35）亦道明「公民抗命」的概念可獲肯定（該案判詞第70至72段）。因此，亦印證我等9人及其他公民抗命者並非可以一般「違法犯事」來解釋及施刑。港人以一般遊行示威爭取民主30年，無論從殖民年代乃至特區年代，皆無顯著改進，今日以更進步主張，公民抗命爭取民主，正如印度、南非、波蘭等對抗強權，實在無可厚非。誠然，堵塞主要幹道，影響民眾上班下課，實非我所願，但回想過來，中共及特區政府多年來豈不更堵塞香港民主之路，妨擾公眾獲得真正的發聲機會？

　　如果我是公民抗命，又何以不認罪承擔刑責？2014年12月，警方以成文法「出席未經批准集結」及「煽動參與未經批准集結」在村口將我逮捕。2017年3月，警方改以普通法「煽惑他人作出公眾妨擾」及「煽惑他人煽惑公眾妨擾」提控。正如戴耀廷先生在其結案陳詞引述英國劍橋大學法學教授 John R. Spencer 提及以普通法提訴的問題：「近年差不多所有以『公眾妨擾罪』來起訴的案件，都出現以下兩種情況的其中一個：一、當被告人的行為是觸犯了成文法律，通常懲罰是輕微的，檢控官想要以一支更大或額外的棒子去打他；二、當被告人的行為看來是明顯完全不涉及刑事責任的，檢控官找不到其他罪名可控訴他」，無獨有偶，前終審法院常任法官鄧楨在其2018年退休致詞提及：「普通法同樣可被用作欺壓的工具。它是一種變化多端的權力，除非妥善地運用人權法加以適當控制，否則可被不當使用。」如今看來，所言非虛。

　　今我遭控二罪，必定據理力爭，冀借助法官閣下明智判決推翻檢控不義，但法庭定讞，我自當承擔刑責，絕無怨言，以成全公民抗命之道。

試問誰還未覺醒

　　我是刻意求刑標榜自己，讓年青人跟從走進監獄大門嗎？我反覆推敲這個問題。然而，我的答案是，正正是希望後輩不用像我此般走進牢獄，我更要無懼怕地爭取人們所當得的。縱使今日面對強權，惡法將至，烏雲密佈，我依然一如既往，毋忘初衷地認為真普選才是港人獲得真正自由之路。任何一個聲稱為下一代福祉者，理應為後輩爭取自由平等的選擇權利，讓他們能自立成長，辨明是非，而非家長式管控思想，讓下一代淪為生財工具，朝廷鷹犬。

　　主耶穌基督說：「我確確實實地告訴你們：一粒麥子如果不落在地裡死去，它仍然是一粒；如果死了，就結出很多子粒來。（《約翰福音》第12章24節）」沒有犧牲，沒有收穫。故然，我不希望年青人跟我一樣要踏上公民抗命之路，承受牢獄之苦，但我請教所有智慧之士，既然舉牌示威遊行均已無顯其效，公民抗命和平抗爭為何不是能令政權受壓求變之策？若非偌大群眾運動，梁振英豈不仍安坐其位？

　　刑罰於我而言，無情可求，唯一我心中所想，就是希望法庭能顧念75歲的朱耀明牧師年事已高，望以非監禁方式處之，讓港人瞥見法庭對良心公民抗命者寬容一面。美國法哲學家羅納德‧德沃金（Ronald Dworkin）在1968年論及公民抗命時（On Not Prosecuting Civil Disobedience），不但認為法庭應給予公民抗命者寬鬆刑罰，甚至應不予起訴。事實上，終審法院非常任法官賀輔明在2014年12月4日，即雨傘運動尾聲（已發生大規模堵路多日），佔中三子自首之後一日，接受《蘋果日報》及《南華早報》訪問時提到「抗爭者及掌權者均未有逾越公民抗命的『遊戲規則』，抗爭活動並沒有損害香港法治」，更進一步提到「一旦他們被判有罪，應該從輕發落，認為這是傳統，因為自首的公民不是邪惡的人」，由此，我期盼法庭將有人道的判刑。

　　法官閣下，我能夠參與雨傘運動，爭取民主，實是毫無悔意，畢生榮幸。我已花了最青春的10年在社會運動上，假若我有80歲，我仍有50年可以與港人同行，繼續奮鬥。要是法官不信，且即管以刑罰來考驗我的意志，試煉我的決心，希望我的戰友們在我囚禁的時候，可以激發愛心，勉勵行善，更加有勇氣和力量作個真誠的人對抗謊言治國的中共政權。

　　「希望在於人民，改變始於抗爭」，唯有透過群眾力量，直接行動，才能改變社會。8年前如是，今日亦如是。但願港人堅定不移，爭取民主，打倒特權，彰顯公義。自由萬歲！民主社會主義萬歲！

　　願公義和慈愛的　主耶穌基督與我同在，與法官先生同在，與香港人同在！

社會民主連線副主席、雨傘運動案第八被告
黃浩銘
二零一九年四月九日

Hope lies in the people
Changes come from resistance
- Umbrella Movement Public Nuisance Case Statement

Your Honour Judge Johnny Chan,

It has been 8 years since I have met you in court. You were the judge to my case on disorder in public places. It was in 2011 and I was only 23 years old. I chased after the then Chief Executive Mr. Donald Tsang and asked if he knew the price of rice and whether he understood the struggles of the poor. Fate has brought us here again, I am before you once again, but I am no longer the young man who was acquitted. When you are reading this statement, I am a “recidivist”, ready to be sent to prison for the third time. However, I do not seek your mercy today, but wish to explain the reasons for my participation in the Umbrella Movement and civil disobedience, so that your honour can give a reasonable sentence through understanding my motives and actions.

Our positions have slightly altered in the past 8 years, but not as great as the changes that took place in Hong Kong. The controversial big white elephant infrastructures were completed. More tourists are visiting, making Hong Kong a bustling city. At the same time, however, more poor people are living in sub-divided flats, more people are forced to the street to protest, more young people are sent to jail. Things we wouldn’t have imagined 8 years are now happening in Hong Kong. When I was before you 8 years ago, we would not have imagined Hong Kong people could be kidnapped by the Chinese authority to Mainland China. We wouldn’t have imagined that one day, the Mainland law enforcement officers could perform their duties in Hong Kong. We wouldn’t have imagined, not only could the Community Chinese government interpret our law, but they could decide on our future and tightened the rule on constitutional rights through the National People’s Congress Decision.

The Original Intention

Is democracy just a slogan? 8 years ago, I criticised the then Chief Executive Mr. Donald Tsang for ignoring the interests of 1 million poor people and 300,000 elderly. I scolded him for celebrating the 1911 Revolution without understanding its preliminary belief. I called for the establishment of universal retirement protection and the abolition of MPF, and was arrested for the first time. Yet, there are still over a million poor people in Hong Kong today, with more than 300,000 of poor elderly. The disparity between the rich and the poor and housing problem have only become worsen.

In 2014, I witnessed a 75-year-old man kneeling before the Secretary for Labour and Welfare Mr. Matthew Cheung Kin-Chung at a public hearing in the Legislative Council. The old man begged the government not to demolish the elderly home in Kwu Tung Dills Corner. In 2019, a 67-year-old woman, who scavenges for cardboards to make a living, cried during the Legislative Council public hearing. She cried because it was impossible for her to get a job. The Secretary for Labour and Welfare Mr. Law Chi-Kwong simply told her to ask for help in the Labour Department. Why are the government officials so callous? Why have our opinions failed to affect the government’s administration? The root of the problem is that Hong Kong people do not have real choices, we have been deprived of the power to supervise the government and to formulate policies.

What is democracy? Democracy means people are the masters. Any policies should be supervised by the people, the society’s resources should be justly distributed to improve the public services, so that the poor is no longer in poverty. However, in today’s Hong Kong, the focus is on the Mainland China, there is collusion between the government and the businesses, there is a great disparity between the rich and the poor, and multi-billion-dollar big white elephant cross-border infrastructure are built one after another. Nurses die from overexertion at work, teachers commit suicide and old man kneels to beg for what he deserves. Yet, the government policies were only minor repairs here and there, giving small treats and favours to the people. How can you win the support of the people? From the civil disobedience movement in 1966 by So Sau-chung and Lo Kei against the increase of Star Ferry fare, until the 1967 riots and 1989 China Patriotic Democratic Movement, even the 2003 march against the purported legistlation of Article 23, they were all due to the political dictatorship, imbalance policies as well as unfair distribution of public resources. It is for these reasons that led to large scale protests. It is for the same reason that the 2014 Umbrella Movement started.

For so many years, Hong Kong people have been fighting for democracy. We demand a just allocation, a life with dignity and space of freedom. However, what do we get in return? On the eve of the signing of the Joint Declaration in 1984, the then premier of the Communist Chinese government Zhao Ziyang in his reply to the demand for democracy and universal suffrage by the University of Hong Kong Student Council clearly promised that ‘what you referred to, namely “rule Hong Kong by democracy” is a matter that goes without saying.’ At the time, a lot of Hong Kong people believed it. They thought they would have democracy after the handover. However, since the bloody suppression on 4th June 1989 and the 500,000 people demonstration against Article 23 in 2003, the plot of the Chinese communist revealed itself. They decided by force through the NPC interpretation in 2004 that there would be no universal suffrage of the Chief Executive and the Legislative Council in 2007 and 2008. Since then, the undemocratic authority of NPC kept a tight grip on the destiny of Hong Kong people. NPC’s interpretation and decisions can be deployed anytime when convenient to assist the propaganda of the authoritative government, forcing the hands of the Hong Kong court and suppressing Hong Kong democracy and the rule of law.

31st August 2014 was a turning point in history. No matter how the moderate scholars tried to persuade it from happening, the Community Chinese government has used the One Country Two System White Paper in June as the foundation and forced its way down onto the people. Even your honour was among them, succumbed to the so called patriotism. After the 8.31 Decision of the National People’s Congress, the plot of the Communist Chinese government has revealed itself, the Chinese government has been lying to the Hong Kong people, they never intended to give Hong Kong genuine universal suffrage. At that time, we believed that civil disobedience was inevitable and was the only way out.

The Starting Point of Civil Disobedience

Is breaking the law sinful? We broke the law with a cause, as “civil disobedience” is the refusal to comply with certain laws considered unjust, as a peaceful form of political protest in the interest of the public to change the unjust system or law. Non-Permanent Judge of the Court of Final Appeal Honourable Leonard Hoffman stated in the well-known R v Jones (Margaret) [2007] 1 AC 136 case that, “civil disobedience on conscientious grounds has a long and honourable history in this country. People who break the law to affirm their belief in the injustice of a law or government action are sometime vindicated by history. It is the mark of a civilised community that it can accommodate protests and demonstrations of this kind.”

The recent decision by the Court of Appeal concerning the Civic Square outside the government headquarter（Secretary for Justice v Wong Chi Fung (2018) 21 HKCFAR 35) also confirmed the idea of civil disobedience(paragraphs 70-72 of the judgment refer). This , therefore, confirmed that myself and the other 8 defendants as well as other civil disobedience protestors, should not be understood as “breaking the law” in its general circumstances, nor should our sentencing be weighted against the usual standard. Hong Kong people have been fighting for democracy through protest for 30 years already, whether it was during the times of colonial British rule or during the special administrative region, there has been no improvement. Today, we fought for democracy, just as the fights for freedom and democracy in India, South Africa and Poland, and civil disobedience is inevitable. It is true that we did not want to block the roads or affect Hong Kong citizens attending to work or school. But on reflection, didn’t the Communist Chinese and Special Administrative governments block our road to democracy and interfere with our rights to speak up?

If what I did was in the name of civil disobedience, why should I defend my case and not bear the criminal responsibility? In December 2014, the police made use of the statutory offences of “attending unauthorised assembly and inciting participation in unauthorised assembly” and arrested me at the village I live in. In March 2017, the police amended their charges to common law offences of “incitement to commit public nuisance and incitement to incite public nuisance”. As Mr. Benny Tai said in his closing submissions, quoting law professor of Cambridge University John R. Spencer on common law charges, “...almost all the prosecutions for public nuisance in recent years seem to have taken place in one of two situations: first, where the defendant’s behaviour amounted to a statutory offence, typically punishable with a small penalty, and the prosecutor wanted a bigger or extra stick to beat him with, and secondly, where the defendant’s behaviour was not obviously criminal at all and the prosecutor could think of nothing else to charge him with.” Coincidentally, the then Court of Appeal Honourable Mr Justice Robert Tang Kwok-ching stated in his retirement speech in 2018 that, “Common law can be used oppressively. It is protean power, unless adequately controlled by the proper application of human rights law, can be misused.” What he said has become true today.

Faced with 2 charges, I am going to stand by reasons and my principles, in order to assist the Court to overturn an unjust prosecution. However, should the court find me guilty, I shall bear the criminal responsibility. I have no qualm or regrets, in fulfilment of my chosen path of civil disobedience.

Who has not yet awoken?

I do reflect as to whether I am simply seeking a criminal sentence in order to make a point, or to encourage other young men to follow my footsteps into the gates of the prison. I have reflected upon this repeatedly. However, my answer is that, I am doing this precisely because I do not wish to see other young men following my suit into the prison. Because of this, I need to fight for what is ours fearlessly. Although today we are confronted by an oppressive authority, the looming legislation of unjust laws and a clouded future, I shall be as I always am: relentless maintaining my stance that a real election is the path to freedom for Hong Kong people. Anyone who claims to be acting in the interest of the next generation should fight for a free and equal choice for their youths. This is in order for them to learn to be independent, to be able to tell rights from wrongs. There should be no paternal thinking, simply teaching the next generation to be slaves of money and accessories to the oppressor.

My Lord Jesus Christ has said: ‘Very truly I tell you, unless a kernel of wheat falls to the ground and dies, it remains only a single seed. But if it dies, it produces many seeds. (Book of John 12:24.) Without sacrifice, there is no reward. I don’t wish to see any more young men having to join the path of civil disobedience as I did, and to pay the price as I did. However, I ask this of all men and women of wisdom: if peaceful demonstration in the old fashioned way has lost its effectiveness and was simply ignored, why is peaceful civil disobedience not a good way to bring about change whilst one is being oppressed? If not for this crowd movement, C Y Leung would still be sitting comfortably on the throne.

I have no mitigation to submit. I only wish that the Court would spare Reverend Chu, who is an elderly of 75 years of age. I pray that a non-custodial sentence may be passed for Reverend Chu. I hope that the Court will have leniency and mercy for Reverend Chu. I refer to the work of the American legal philosopher Ronald Dworkin in 1968, namely: ‘On Not Prosecuting Civil Disobedience’. He opined that, not only should the Court allow leniency to civil disobedience participants, but also should they not be prosecuted. In fact, Lord Hoffmann NPJ of the CFA stated the following in an interview with Apple Daily and South China Morning Post on 4th December 2014 (which was at the end of the Umbrella Movement, a day before the surrender of the 3 initiators of the Occupy Central Movement): ‘In any civilised society, there is room for people making political points by civil disobedience.’ ‘These are not wicked people.’ Civil disobedience had ‘an old tradition’ in the common law world. ‘When it comes to punishment, the court should take into account their personal convictions.’ In light of this, I hope the Court shall pass a humane sentence.

Your honour, I have no regret for participating in the Umbrella Movement and the fight for democracy. It was an honour of a lifetime. I have spent the best 10 years of my youth in social movements. If I can live up to 80-year-old, I would still have 50 years to walk alongside the people of Hong Kong, to continue the fight. If this is in doubt, please test my will against the whips of criminal punishment. I shall take this as a trial of my determination. I only hope that my brothers and sisters-in-arms can be inspired whilst I am imprisoned, to do goods and encourage others. I hope they shall have further courage and strength to be honest men and women, to fight against the lies of the ruling Chinese Communist authority.

“Hope lies in the hands of the people, change starts from resistance.’ It’s only through the power of the people and direct action that the society can be changed. This was so 8 years ago. This is still the case today. May the will of the people of Hong Kong be firm and determined, to fight for democracy, overthrow the privileged, and let justice be done. All hail for freedom! All hail for democratic socialism!

May justice and peace of my Lord Jesus Christ be with me, with your Honour and with the People of Hong Kong!

Vice President of the League of Social Democrats,
the 8th Defendant of the Umbrella Movement Case

Raphael Wong Ho Ming
10th April 2019

《天天父母親節》(English version below)
EVERYDAY IS FATHER'S AND MOTHER'S DAY

妳你知不知道，妳你是怎麼出現在這人間的？妳你知不知道，妳你的眼睛，是如何能見到光明，見到這世界的？妳你知不知道，妳你的耳朵，是如何能聽見聲音的？妳你知不知到，妳你的鼻子，是如何能夠呼吸的？妳你知不知道，妳你的舌頭，是如何能嚐到百味的？妳你知不知道，妳你的口，是如何能說話的？妳你知不知道，妳你的身體如何有的？這一切都是我們父母的精和卵結合的生命，還有十月懷胎、安胎、養胎，以及臨盆時的恐慌，與危險而所造就的。

佛、道、儒三教，皆大力倡導孝心、孝行。若妳你說妳你不必行孝，

原因一：妳你是西方信仰。
原因二：妳你無任何信仰。
原因三：妳你是孤兒。
原因四：妳你父母已不在人世。
原因五：妳你不是父母最寵的孩子。

告訴妳你，西方信仰的教義，其實就同中國的儒教，提倡己立而立人，己達而達人，也就是先把人的基礎，給打好。有人將儒教，歸類爲人乘，這段落的開頭吾已寫到，儒教也大力倡導孝心孝行，西方信仰既同於儒教人乘，都在講做人的基礎，哪有不必行孝這種邪說與歪理。除非這人不想做人，祇想做畜生。

行孝根本和信仰，毫無關係。行孝乃是做人的基本良知，倫理的道德。因此，祇要妳你是人的話，行孝是天經地義的。孤兒的由來，依然是爸媽的精卵，依然懷妳你，托著妳你，含著生命的危險，才把妳你給生出來。要不然，妳你連孤兒，這兩個字都沒有。生父生母妳妳或許，沒機會盡孝行孝，但妳你可以好好的孝敬孝敬養父養母呀！若父母已不在人世的妳你，可以天天唸佛修法，迴向她他們轉投更好的境界。要不妳你最起碼，也應奉公守法，不爲非作歹，行坐皆正啊！吾，玳瑚師父，實實在在，告訴妳你，吾並不是父母最寵的孩子，但吾自修自正，大力以佛法與玄學，廣利冥陽眾生，也常爲她他們法會報名與主祈，修法迴向之等等，以報父母難報之恩啊！

很多人總喜歡在所謂的父親節及母親節時，帶父母上餐館用餐，或包個利市給父母，或買個禮物送父母，或帶父母出國遊玩。這些是無可厚非的，也是人之常情。不過，這裡有幾點，大家必需得有所認知，才能真正的算得上，慶祝父母親節。

一、父母親節並不是，中華民族所定立。
二、帶父母親上餐館、出國遊玩、送禮物，是慶祝但更是享樂。

反一切的享與用，都是在消耗我們的福。而我們的福一旦被享完，災禍也就隨後跟著來。這些就是爲什麼，前幾天才慶祝父母親節，家裡其中一老就身體有恙，工作上、生意上皆不順逐等等。古德有言，聖哲有言、祖師有言，每天晨起向父母微笑請安、隨順父母，與父母一同昇華心靈，對父母關懷備至，遠比唯在父母親節，給於她他們的「享與用」，來得更實在更實惠。表示對父母的感恩，不是也不可在一年一度裡，而是將以上吾所寫的，實現在每一天裡，這就是天天父母親節。

..............................

Do you know how did you appear in this human world? Have you got any idea how you get the ability of sight to see light, and this world? Do you know how your ears are able to hear sounds? How about your nose? Do you know how you can breath through it? Do you know how you can taste a hundred different flavors through your tongue? Not forgetting your mouth, do you know how you get the ability to speak? Lastly, do you know how your body is formed? All these are attributed to our parents' sperm and egg, the 10-month pregnancy, miscarriage prevention, fetal nourishment, not to mention the fear and danger when it is time to give birth to us.

The 3 schools of Buddhism, Taoism and Confucianism all strongly advocate the virtues of filial piety. If you say that there is no need to be filial, there must be a few reasons:

Reason No. 1: You are of a western faith and religion.

Reason No. 2: You have no faith or religion at all.

Reason No. 3: You are an orphan.

Reason No. 4: Your parents have already passed on.

Reason No. 5: You are not your parents' most doted child.

Let me tell you thus, the Western faith preaches similar dogma to that of the Chinese Confucian school of thought: Just as you would like to establish yourself in the world, so allow others to establish themselves. Just as you seek to understand things, so allow others the same opportunity. In other words, first lay a solid foundation as a human being. Some people classify Confucianism as The Way To Be A Human Being. As I wrote at the beginning of this paragraph, Confucianism also strongly espouses the virtues of filial piety, and the Western faith is similar to Confucianism in preaching the foundation qualities a human should have.

Therefore, it is nonsense and evil saying that one does not need to perform filial duties. Unless this person does not wish to be a human, but only an animal.

Being filial has absolutely nothing to do with faith and religion. It is the basic foundation of the human conscience and moral principles. Therefore, as long as you are a human, being filial piety is the unalterable principle of Heaven and Earth. Even an orphan is borne out of his or her parents' sperm and egg, and the exhaustion and risk of the pregnancy period and delivery. Without this, you won't even be able to be called an orphan. As an orphan, you may not have the opportunity to perform filial duties to your biological parents, but you can do it dutifully for your foster parents!

If your parents are no longer alive, you can recite the Buddha's name and perform spiritual cultivation everyday, and dedicate the merits to a better afterlife for them. Or at the very least, you can abide by the law, abstain from evil doings and be a righteous person in your daily living! I, Master Dai Hu, can honestly tell you that I am not my parent's favourite child. However, I self-studied and corrected myself. I put in great effort to benefit sentient beings, both in the worlds of the living and the dead, with Dharma and Chinese Metaphysics. In addition, I accumulate merits for them by regularly registering them as primary supplicants in numerous puja sessions, and through my daily Buddhist practices, etc. All these to repay the huge and impossible-to-repay debt of gratitude to my parents!

On the other hand, all forms of enjoyment and usage exhaust our store of good fortune. When our good fortune are fully depleted, misfortune will strike. This is why a few days after a Father's or Mother's Day celebration, you encounter situations like sickness in one of the old folks at home, obstacles in your career or business, etc. The ancient virtuous teachers, sages and masters have these sayings, that we should greet our parents with a smile every morning, follow their wishes, and progress spiritually together with them. We must also show meticulous care and concern towards them.

These practical actions speak volumes, and dwarf the once-a-year showering of dinner and gifts on Father's or Mother's Day, for their indulgence and usage.

Expressing our gratitude to our parents cannot be performed only on a single day each year. Follow what I wrote above, and actualize your filial piety every day. And we will have Father's and Mother's Day every day.

*********************
【開放預購】PRE-ORDER OPEN
《向善向上 2》Towards Kindness, Towards Betterment 2

心可造天堂，心可造地獄。
改命必從心起，改運必先行動。

30則真人真事的度眾故事 30 real-life deliverance stories of Master Dai Hu
全彩色的漫畫 Comics in full colour illustration
中英文翻譯 In both English & Mandarin
192頁 192 pages

此書將於2018年11月底印刷完畢，目前開放預購，預計12月15日之前以Smartpac寄出 （本地郵寄），屆時也會在台灣金石堂書局同步上架。價格大眾化，包涵全球運送，無需再付郵資。

歡迎大家踴躍支持，人手一冊，也可將此書贈送給鄉親父老、親朋好友，帶領他們向善向上，迎接更美好的未來！

https://booklaunch.io/masterdaihu/towardskindness2

.

The mind can create Heaven. It can also create Hell.
Transformation of your destiny begins from your mind.
Transformation of your luck begins from taking action.

My new book should reach the shores of Singapore in 1st week of December 2018. Pre-order is now open and the books are estimated to be mailed out through Smartpac, by 15 December. At the same time, it will be on the shelves of Taiwan KingStone bookshops.

The economical price includes global delivery (Smartpac mailing for Singapore addressees, registered mail for overseas mailing).

Looking forward to your enthusiastic support! May everybody has a copy and gift copies of this virtuous book to your family and friends and together, embrace a beautiful future!

https://booklaunch.io/masterdaihu/towardskindness

Do you struggle with multiple timeframes?

For example:

The Daily timeframe is in an uptrend, but the 1-hour is in a downtrend.

So, what now? Do you buy or sell?

Well, the answer will be clear as water once you’ve mastered multiple timeframes.

And the good news is, in today’s training you’ll learn:

1. A mistake almost all traders make when trading with multiple timeframes and how to avoid it
2. How to understand multiple timeframes like a pro without getting confused about whether you should be buying or selling
3. How to identify stacked levels so you can “predict” market turning points with sniper accuracy
4. How to time your entry just when the market is about to move in your direction without being “too early”
5. And much more!

Are you interested?

Then go watch it right now...

** FREE TRADING STRATEGY GUIDES **

The Ultimate Guide to Price Action Trading: https://www.tradingwithrayner.com/ultimate-guide-price-action-trading/

The Monster Guide to Candlestick Patterns: https://www.tradingwithrayner.com/candlestick-pdf-guide/

** PREMIUM TRAINING **

Pro Traders Edge: https://www.tradingwithrayner.com/pte/

Pullback Stock Trading System: https://pullbackstocktradingsystem.com/

Price Action Trading Secrets: https://priceactiontradingsecrets.com/

For free trading education, go to http://www.tradingwithrayner.com

I believe you’ll enjoy this forex trading strategy video.

Because I will start from scratch, with a blank chart.

Then, I’ll draw my Support & Resistance areas.

Next, I’ll add in a simple indicator that tells me whether to be long or short.

Finally, you’ll learn my thought process on how I’m looking to enter a trade — and why.

The BEST part?

You can apply this forex trading strategy to any markets or timeframes.

Whether it’s stocks, forex, futures, bonds, metals, and indices. Or the Weekly, Daily, 4-hour, 1-hour, and even the 5-minutes timeframe.

So, if you’re interested then go learn this forex trading strategy below…

** FREE TRADING STRATEGY GUIDES **

The Ultimate Guide to Price Action Trading: https://www.tradingwithrayner.com/ultimate-guide-price-action-trading/

The Monster Guide to Candlestick Patterns: https://www.tradingwithrayner.com/candlestick-pdf-guide/

** PREMIUM TRAINING **

Pro Traders Edge: https://www.tradingwithrayner.com/pte/

Pullback Stock Trading System: https://pullbackstocktradingsystem.com/

To enter the giveaway:

1.Answer in the description box: What is the hero product of Hiruscar Anti Acne Skincare range and what is the function of it?

2. Get 1 friend to subscribe to my channel and leave their channel link in the description box

3. Give this video a thumbs up, and be sure to subscribe to my channel

*5 winners will win a full set of Hiruscar Anti Acne Skincare products
*End date 26/9/2017

Goodluck! :)


WHAT IS HIRUSCAR ANTI-ACNE?
Hiruscar Anti-Acne range has been created to address mild to moderate of the various acne conditions like Blackheads/Whiteheads, Papules and Pustules with proven efficacy. It helps to control sebum secretion, reduces bacteria, removes dead skin cells, balances skin moisture level and reduces acne recurrence. Specially formulated to be gentle on skin, non-irritating and perfect for facial usage and acne-prone skin.

Why Hiruscar Anti-Acne?
Fast action and it is an effective treatment for various types of acne. Acne spot visibly reduce in size in 2 days* due to the product’s keratolytic property. And you can depend on it to improve the acne condition within 1 week* by making Hiruscar Anti Acne range as part of your daily skincare routine.
Hiruscar Anti Acne helps to reduce acne, reduce red mark on acne and acne recurrence.
Contains Salicylic Acid that will promote the sloughingaway of dead skin cells and unblock pores.
Formulated with unique ingredient – MPS which helps increases and improves skin’s hydration level.
Contains Vitamin C to reduce dark spots from blemish and acne.
Alcohol free and colorant free formula.
Tested Non-Comedogenic and Hypo Allergenic and suitable for daily use.

HOW TO USE HIRUSCAR ANTI-ACNE?
Click here - http://hiruscar.com.my/how-to-use-hir... to find out more!

How to purchase, and what is the price? Click http://www.watsons.com.my/search?text... to shop or purchase it from any Watsons Malaysia stores or E-store!

LET'S BE FRIENDS!

Website: www.faafirds.com

Instagram:
http://instagram.com/faafirds

Twitter:
http://twitter.com/faafirds

Facebook page:
https://www.facebook.com/pages/Faafirds

Snapchat:
faafirds

Email:
faafirds@hotmail.com

DISCLAIMER
This video is not sponsored. All opinions are my own. There may be affiliate links used above. Most of the items I have purchased myself but some may have been gifted to me by companies.