重點在此的八卦，YOUTUBE、PINTEREST和Yahoo名人娛樂都在討論

我們與精神疾病患者的距離
易讀版: https://awater.tw/archives/429

近期鄭家純與陳沂的名字又再度躍上新聞版面，起因是鄭家純曾經委任過一次的律師，被媒體爆料介入仙人跳團隊組織，此事件給了陳沂逮到機會，大肆胡亂開砲，而後家純多次試圖與其聯絡未果，打了許多電話仍無法聯繫到陳沂，而陳沂更在臉書上公布家純的私人手機，讓彼此的對立更為攀升。

開頭先做個簡單的法律常識教育。

在跟騷法還未三讀通過前，鄭家純的行為不構成任何法律問題，即使未來法條上線後也因為不溯及既往，所以不會有問題，但陳沂將鄭家純私人手機公開後，已經明顯違反個資法。

回到主題。

昨天兩人在晚間時的直播更是同時在線一舉突破1.5萬人，本已經將陳沂封鎖的我，還特別用我老婆的手機去看直播，但當我一看之後就發現事態不妙，陳沂「疑似」生病非常嚴重，而她本人卻絲毫不自知。

國際上對於精神相關疾病有相當嚴謹的定義。

在台灣被稱為思覺失調，其特徵包含錯誤的信念(妄想)，覺知不存在的東西(幻覺)，語無倫次以及不合時宜的行為舉止，甚至從她的行為模式與發言中可以明顯看出，陳沂恐面臨嚴重的焦慮與憂鬱症狀，以至於她無法正常生活。

這件事情最棘手的，就在於陳沂完全沒有病識感。

以學術界的四個等級，她仍處於第一級。

一、缺乏病識感 - 完全否認自己生病，也不認為需要接受治療。

二、部分病識感 - 承認自己有症狀，但歸咎於其他原因，不願意接受自己生病，也可能不願意接受治療。

三、理智病識感 - 理智上承認自己生病並需要接受治療，但情感上還無法接受，對治療的動機較弱與被動。

四、情感病識感 - 承認自己生病並需要接受治療，且情感上能接受，願意積極尋求治療與協助。

這是相當值得眾人關注且明白的事情。

過去許多人總認為幕前的工作者會在鏡頭前刻意放大的某些特質，以藉此特異獨行的言行舉止來吸引群眾，當她的行為模式已經超乎正常人的邏輯時，其實她生病很嚴重了，這時候我們如果還與其相互呼應，這是不對的。

昨天如果有看到兩人的直播，你會發現陳沂真的有太多的地方已經嚴重不對勁了。

包含其說話語無倫次顛三倒四，當家純試圖與其談論任何話題時，陳沂就會開始不斷閃躲跳耀話題，甚至用著超乎常人理解的邏輯在回應，開始東拉西扯的對話，這也是為何昨天的直播過後，陳沂又再度遭受到攻擊，而鄭家純又收穫了大批的支持者。

這是不對的。

我在此也對 鄭家純 呼籲，真的不能再與陳沂繼續耗下去了，我相信她也有感受到陳沂不只生病，而且在心理疾病上已經可說是病入膏肓了，家純也對這塊有過不少的鑽研，相信能夠懂我所說的，我們不該再加重其病情了。

我在此也鄭重地宣布，以後對於陳沂的任何挑釁行為與各式標註我粉專的行為，我都不會有任何的回應，我在這邊只期盼陳沂能夠早日康復，在未經專業的醫師許可下，真的不能擅自停藥，這不只是會讓病情嚴重，更會造成嚴重的副作用。

也希望大家能夠多幾分包容與耐心，生病的人不會能夠理解自己的行為是錯誤的，也不要試圖去與其溝通，重要的應該是讓專業的醫療團隊介入，真正的讓其痊癒才是重點。

在此祝福陳沂能夠早日康復。

正如我在媒體上曾經說的，幾年前我曾經遇過她本人，那時她還是很健康的，更是對於成名擁有十足的企圖心，但在成為創作者的過程是很艱辛的，正如我前天的文章中所寫，在忍受孤寂的過程中，很多創作者就會開始產生心理疾病。

陳沂就可以說是最具代表性的例子。

也因此我們身邊的人都應該善待她，學習不要去與其計較，鼓勵她安慰她讓她知道這個世界是正面的，只有她願意真正的去積極治療，我們才有機會見到曾經健康的她。

陳沂妳一定沒問題的，加油。

IG : Awater0911
專屬社團 - 鬼才阿水Awater的東吳水軍社團
「浪Live」4791472 / 鬼才阿水Awater

【劍橋辯論會（Cambridge Union）演說：China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong】

雖不獲法庭批准離港，我仍在上週透過視像會議方式，參與英國劍橋辯論會（Cambridge Union）的辯論「This House Believes China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong」。

發言期間，除解說香港淪落為警察城市（Police State）的源由，直斥在習近平主政下，人民權利不斷受到侵害；我亦以武漢肺炎為例，提到政權面對疫情爆發，多番以中國國家利益與民族認同，凌駕港人切身安危。

其實官員拒絕完全封關和強制隔離入境陸客，同時兩地社會融合與經濟活動在過去十年越加頻繁，反倒成為香港憂慮疫情難以受控的主因，更說明港中區隔的當務之急，而管治失能只會促使民間自救呼聲越加頻繁，不再寄望和依賴政府。

https://youtu.be/xx0uGpJV38U

#眾志國際連結 #SelfGovernance

Cambridge Union Debate: This House Believes China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong

When we speak of Imperial Power, it doesn’t necessarily mean a colonial power. But we are referring to an act of expanding influence and authority over a territory through political, legal, economic or even military means. And indeed, the Chinese communist government has exerted that influence over Hong Kong since the Handover in 1997 and escalated that influence more rapidly and more aggressively after 2003.

The principle of ‘One Country, Two Systems’ is a fragile ruling philosophy defining China-Hong Kong relations, guaranteeing the global financial city its autonomy. But in the past 22 years, Beijing intervened on many fronts already, abusing this ruling philosophy and implementing authoritarian measures upon Hong Kong citizens.

---------------------------------

My activism experience serves as a clear case for the motion. Hong Kong’s civil society has long been the constant target of state attack, and the motive is crystal clear: to eradicate opposition in order to maintain China’s dominating influence over Hong Kong. The Oppression of personal freedoms is merely one case in point.

Last year in June, shortly after serving my prison sentence, I went protesting against the controversial extradition bill, exercising my freedom to assembly. The government arrested me again and charged me of inciting people taking part in an unlawful assembly. Then I went contesting in local election, yet the government banned me from running for office because of my political stance.

I then turned to international advocacy, planning to fly to the United Kingdom and other European countries to explain our democratic and peaceful cause. Regrettably, the court thought this parliamentary hearing is not important and rejected my travel application. Every time I spoke in parliamentary hearings, no matter in person or via skype, the Chinese foreign ministry would condemn that parliament for colliding with a so-called separatist who has never advocated independence.

Following these encounters, it's become clear now I'm deprived of the right to the election, freedom of movement, freedom of assembly (not allowed to appear on designated area), and freedom of speech. The civil liberties guaranteed in the constitution are however no longer applicable to me. These oppressive measures are not out of political context.

---------------------------------

#重點在此 I’d also argue that time and again, China’s national pride and interests override Hong Kong’s own interests. The development in the past decade has shown that many of the competitive edges of Hong Kong as a global financial city like rule of law, free flow of information, checks and balances are compromised and give way to Xi Jinping’s Chinese Dream. The Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak precisely explain this argument. Hong Kong, given its proximity to mainland China, is highly prone to infection and spread of disease.

Instead of taking strict measures to prevent public health crisis from erupting, the Hong Kong government, as of today, still refused to close the border, allowing countless potential cases flee to Hong Kong and further dampen the burden of Hong Kong’s medical services. From the moment that Xi Jinping’s image become the top priority, the autonomous decision-making mechanism of the Hong Kong government has collapsed.

The opposing side may argue that China is not imperial power in HK because integration and cooperation in the past have fostered but not encroached economic development in Hong Kong and our city does benefit from it. I’m afraid I cannot agree with this viewpoint at all.

Growing socio-economic integration with China, more connected transport infrastructure like the High-Speed Railway, are accounted for the city’s outbreak of Coronavirus. The first five patients confirmed positive to the virus were passengers of the Railway. Behind the grand narratives of ‘economic integration’ is more blatant aggression of the Hong Kong system. Hong Kong always has to give in and make up for its sovereign country’s faulty policy.

---------------------------------

In conclusion, I have two questions for everyone. Can citizens in New York directly elected their mayor? Yes. Can citizens in London directly their mayor? Yes. We are not asking go too far, but just hope to ask for election rather that selection under Chinese rule to hand-pick those Beijing Loyalists.People in Hong Kong is not experiencing rule of law but only suffering from rule by tear gas. The root cause of crisi is police brutality, which included live round fired towards high school students, young lady being gang rape in police stations and 8000 people arrested from the age of 11 to 84.

When offenses are committed and the offenders are prosecuted as is now happening, there’s no damage to the rule of law at all. It’s only when police officers who beat people up and none of them has even been arrested, that the rule of law is damaged. There’s no rule of law when the brutality of police officers goes unpunished!

Therefore, the House should recognize the fact that China is not only the new imperial power in HK, but it is also an authoritarian and oppressive imperial power since Emperor Xi took over the power. The continuing intervention of the Chinese authorities in Hong Kong’s local affairs presents a fundamental challenge to the continuation of HK peoples identity and way of life.

We are proud to be HongKongers and we hope to determine our own future. That’s the reason for cross-generation of HKers to fight for freedom and wish you can stand with Hong Kong. Thank you.

【劍橋辯論會（Cambridge Union）演說：China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong】

雖不獲法庭批准離港，我仍在上週透過視像會議方式，參與英國劍橋辯論會（Cambridge Union）的辯論「This House Believes China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong」。

發言期間，除解說香港淪落為警察城市（Police State）的源由，直斥在習近平主政下，人民權利不斷受到侵害；我亦以武漢肺炎為例，提到政權面對疫情爆發，多番以中國國家利益與民族認同，凌駕港人切身安危。

其實官員拒絕完全封關和強制隔離入境陸客，同時兩地社會融合與經濟活動在過去十年越加頻繁，反倒成為香港憂慮疫情難以受控的主因，更說明港中區隔的當務之急，而管治失能只會促使民間自救呼聲越加頻繁，不再寄望和依賴政府。

https://youtu.be/xx0uGpJV38U

#眾志國際連結 #SelfGovernance

Cambridge Union Debate: This House Believes China is the New Imperial Power in Hong Kong

When we speak of Imperial Power, it doesn’t necessarily mean a colonial power. But we are referring to an act of expanding influence and authority over a territory through political, legal, economic or even military means. And indeed, the Chinese communist government has exerted that influence over Hong Kong since the Handover in 1997 and escalated that influence more rapidly and more aggressively after 2003.

The principle of ‘One Country, Two Systems’ is a fragile ruling philosophy defining China-Hong Kong relations, guaranteeing the global financial city its autonomy. But in the past 22 years, Beijing intervened on many fronts already, abusing this ruling philosophy and implementing authoritarian measures upon Hong Kong citizens.

-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-

My activism experience serves as a clear case for the motion. Hong Kong’s civil society has long been the constant target of state attack, and the motive is crystal clear: to eradicate opposition in order to maintain China’s dominating influence over Hong Kong. The Oppression of personal freedoms is merely one case in point.

Last year in June, shortly after serving my prison sentence, I went protesting against the controversial extradition bill, exercising my freedom to assembly. The government arrested me again and charged me of inciting people taking part in an unlawful assembly. Then I went contesting in local election, yet the government banned me from running for office because of my political stance.

I then turned to international advocacy, planning to fly to the United Kingdom and other European countries to explain our democratic and peaceful cause. Regrettably, the court thought this parliamentary hearing is not important and rejected my travel application. Every time I spoke in parliamentary hearings, no matter in person or via skype, the Chinese foreign ministry would condemn that parliament for colliding with a so-called separatist who has never advocated independence.

Following these encounters, it's become clear now I'm deprived of the right to the election, freedom of movement, freedom of assembly (not allowed to appear on designated area), and freedom of speech. The civil liberties guaranteed in the constitution are however no longer applicable to me. These oppressive measures are not out of political context.

-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-

#重點在此 I’d also argue that time and again, China’s national pride and interests override Hong Kong’s own interests. The development in the past decade has shown that many of the competitive edges of Hong Kong as a global financial city like rule of law, free flow of information, checks and balances are compromised and give way to Xi Jinping’s Chinese Dream. The Wuhan Coronavirus outbreak precisely explain this argument. Hong Kong, given its proximity to mainland China, is highly prone to infection and spread of disease.

Instead of taking strict measures to prevent public health crisis from erupting, the Hong Kong government, as of today, still refused to close the border, allowing countless potential cases flee to Hong Kong and further dampen the burden of Hong Kong’s medical services. From the moment that Xi Jinping’s image become the top priority, the autonomous decision-making mechanism of the Hong Kong government has collapsed.

The opposing side may argue that China is not imperial power in HK because integration and cooperation in the past have fostered but not encroached economic development in Hong Kong and our city does benefit from it. I’m afraid I cannot agree with this viewpoint at all.

Growing socio-economic integration with China, more connected transport infrastructure like the High-Speed Railway, are accounted for the city’s outbreak of Coronavirus. The first five patients confirmed positive to the virus were passengers of the Railway. Behind the grand narratives of ‘economic integration’ is more blatant aggression of the Hong Kong system. Hong Kong always has to give in and make up for its sovereign country’s faulty policy.

-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-

In conclusion, I have two questions for everyone. Can citizens in New York directly elected their mayor? Yes. Can citizens in London directly their mayor? Yes. We are not asking go too far, but just hope to ask for election rather that selection under Chinese rule to hand-pick those Beijing Loyalists.People in Hong Kong is not experiencing rule of law but only suffering from rule by tear gas. The root cause of crisi is police brutality, which included live round fired towards high school students, young lady being gang rape in police stations and 8000 people arrested from the age of 11 to 84.

When offenses are committed and the offenders are prosecuted as is now happening, there’s no damage to the rule of law at all. It’s only when police officers who beat people up and none of them has even been arrested, that the rule of law is damaged. There’s no rule of law when the brutality of police officers goes unpunished!

Therefore, the House should recognize the fact that China is not only the new imperial power in HK, but it is also an authoritarian and oppressive imperial power since Emperor Xi took over the power. The continuing intervention of the Chinese authorities in Hong Kong’s local affairs presents a fundamental challenge to the continuation of HK peoples identity and way of life.

We are proud to be HongKongers and we hope to determine our own future. That’s the reason for cross-generation of HKers to fight for freedom and wish you can stand with Hong Kong. Thank you.

[ ♬ 數位音樂平台]
iTunes : http://smarturl.it/Ronghaoli
KKBOX: http://kkbox.fm/La0XJS
myMusic: http://smarturl.it/Ronghaoli_mm
Omusic: http://smarturl.it/Ronghaoli_om
Spotify: http://smarturl.it/Ronghaoli_sp

▶ 不搭 鈴聲下載資訊:
中華用戶: 手機直撥700→按4→輸入827848
遠傳電信用戶: 手機直撥900→按1→說出「李榮浩」即可下載
--------------------------------------------------------------------------

誰都和他不搭
他是自己的喜劇之王
李榮浩加盟華納音樂首張創作大碟李榮浩
2014.11.28 正式發行

李榮浩新專輯第二波主打「不搭」由黃中平導演執導，忠實呈現歌詞裡，一對男女間，生活方式和價值觀的差異性，男生為了女生而不斷改變自己，試圖融入對方的世界，但在對方的世界裡，怎麼看都如此格格不入與不搭。

不搭（詞／曲：李榮浩）
「不搭」是整張專輯中，最接近標準情歌的一首。描述一對情侶在日常生活中，各方面習慣、相處的格格不入，但總是因為「愛」，能讓兩人在不搭的互動中繼續走下去。

這樣的情節，幾乎可以套用在所有人的生活經驗中，每個人生來的環境不同，自然個性也有差異，要能長期相處，總要在不搭中不斷磨合，中間一些吵吵鬧鬧，到最後還是分不開，當然也是因為愛。歌詞最後一句「跟我相愛誰都不搭」，點出整首歌傳達重點，沒有誰和誰能完全合拍，或許因為不搭，彼此才深深的相互吸引吧！


不落俗套　為苦悶日子解套
不唱高調　好聽得無法低調
一整年只等一張李榮浩
全亞洲音樂人／媒體／樂迷 屏息期盼
新時代的獨特　新音樂的模特　李榮浩
加盟華納音樂首張創作大碟李榮浩
2014.11.28 正式發行

李榮浩新歌演唱會
時間：11/30（日） 晚上七點
地點：Neo Studio（台北市信義區松壽路22號5F）
入場方式：憑全新專輯入場
最新活動訊息請鎖定華納官方FB
https://www.facebook.com/WarnerMusicTaiwan

李榮浩專輯推出後，也將於11/30（日）晚上七點在Neo Studio舉辦他的新歌演唱會。今年金曲獎舞台上，李榮浩簡短的現場演出已讓歌迷為之驚豔，這次首度在台灣的專場演出，李榮浩也將帶來多位他長期合作的樂手們，精銳盡出，感受他的現場魅力。

●更多李榮浩消息:
李榮浩官方臉書FB：https://www.facebook.com/ronghaoli711
李榮浩官方新浪微博：http://tw.weibo.com/leeyoungho
華納官方FB:https://www.facebook.com/WarnerMusicTaiwan
華納線上音樂雜誌：http://www.warnermusic.com.tw
華納音樂台灣新浪微博：http://weibo.com/3849734662/

❄☃ about this video
歡迎兩倍速撥放，
事發在今年2018的5/4，被吉普賽小孩把錢包偷走
嗯⋯⋯希望大家不要只用20分鐘斷定我是個怎麼樣的人
（很多人有疑問但片中沒提的：因事後有調閱監視器而證實）
哭成那樣現在覺得太傻了呀，但就是很真實，
相信大多人在這樣的情境下掉了證件都會心急如焚
大筆的金額令我惶恐，但更多的是，我該怎麼回家？我的下一步是什麼？
怎麼在亂了手腳的當下，想辦法讓旅行繼續，
也許我處理得不夠冷靜，也許我眼淚太輕彈，
但本影片重點只是希望能給想去歐洲的朋友一些警訊
歐洲還是美得讓我想一去再去，還請大家笑看此片並多加注意治安的嚴重性。

❄☃ 為什麼關留言？
當你們上班上到一半
一堆匿名留言叫你死在歐洲、罵你醜八怪難怪被偷，被網路言語霸凌，
你就會知道為什麼了。

⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️
那麼給有類似情況的朋友：
請去大陸的大使館求助 -by各種網友

❄☃ Murmur
我知道很笨也滿好笑的吧，
但身為受害者再接續一連串的蝴蝶效應，
希望你們停止指責我滑那麼五分鐘的手機，
在荒郊野外的公路旁休息站滑一下是我疏忽了，所以我得到應有的後果。
歐洲治安議題聊不完，
每個有經驗、無經驗的人也有說不完的心得、道不完的甘苦
大家也有給不完的建議。
去玩請大家保護好自己，因為要防護到什麼程度是自己決定的，
我就是去了歐洲各國幾次，發現挺幸運的啊，都沒事，
進而心態鬆散的人，
還請大家不要不信邪，引我為戒才是。

⟜ 𝐅𝐨𝐥𝐥𝐨𝐰 𝐦𝐞
IG：https://is.gd/JlXxZz
FB：https://is.gd/gzr24q
我的愛用品：https://www.dontkjoanne.tw/fav/

⟜ 𝐏𝐚𝐫𝐭 𝐓𝐢𝐦𝐞 / 我的兼職 - 整理師
預約整理：https://re-life7.webnode.tw/
整理初級課：https://bit.ly/2YapUFz
整理初+中級課：https://bit.ly/3gZBFal
整理師是什麼？：https://is.gd/BzAnpK

⟜ 𝐌𝐮𝐬𝐢𝐜 / epidemicsound.com
⦸ 影片‘無授權’任何平台搬運轉載與使用

「因為保有你，我感覺幸福；
同時保有自己，所以能安心自由。」
━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

伴侶關係 在獨處中相處 在相處中獨處
知性歌手劉若英整一年沈思主題 誠實成歌

作為一個詮釋過無數種人格、演繹過無數他人故事的演員、歌手，劉若英自己，卻始終都在練習著一個人。

一個人看電影、唱KTV、吃餐館都只能算是基本習慣，她也可以一個人離開台灣，去到任何地方，進行任何工作，面對任何未知。初出道，她就曾一個人帶了個行李箱，到中國大陸人生地不熟的酷寒之地，拍攝一齣工時長達三個月的電影。初入唱片業時，做小助理，她也時常一個人留守錄音室通宵到天亮，在公司樓下曙光中的停車場，感到人生真的就是孑然一身。

總是一個人處理很多事，那只是劉若英眼中生命的必然。因為不想麻煩別人，因為誠實面對生活，也就安然獨處。即使有了伴侶，有了孩子，反而促使她更進一步理解孤獨的另一層境界。她花一年的時間，探討「獨處」與「相處」，與朋友切磋，寫成文字。她說，結婚不是兩個人變成一個人，而是兩個「一個人」在一起生活。

劉若英將這一年來的沈思體會，都注入創作裡，成書，成歌。同時也是婚後對兩人關係更進一步的思索，因為珍惜，所以戰戰兢兢，念念不忘。


━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━━

「我敢在你心中享受我孤獨
我的堅強和你柔情沒有衝突
有你 我很幸福 就像我 擁有我 很滿足」

詞神林夕突破詞風 量身打造「知性抒情」新詞體
劉若英「我敢在你懷裡孤獨」將一本書 唱成一首歌

「我敢在你懷裡孤獨」是一句話，也是一本書，現在更成為一首歌。
它是婚後的劉若英，給自己心境的一次註腳。或許重點不是「孤獨」，也不是「你懷裡」，而是那赤裸裸的「我敢」兩個字。誰能大剌剌地承認孤獨，尤其是在另一個人的懷中，然而，因為孤獨的自己而找到了另一伴，若忽略了孤獨，豈不等於忽略了自己？

「我敢在你懷裡孤獨」是劉若英最新的散文集結，是她與八名好友的對談、分享獨處經歷的精華呈現。在決定錄製成歌之後，因為覺得「親愛的路人」這首詞裡，林夕寫出了她最深層的心情，劉若英再次邀請林夕來寫「我敢在你懷裡孤獨」的歌詞，以便更直接地承接她的心境。

林夕接到題目、閱讀過劉若英的文字之後，認為這是一首「知性抒情」歌曲，因此他屏棄傳統情歌一貫抒情的筆法，使用大量金句鋪墊，用硬手法處理軟主題，傳達歌者對孤獨的心得。「我敢在你懷裏面對我孤獨/傾聽你心跳 跟自己傾訴/總是數一個人 兩個人 的好處/想不起和自己怎樣同甘共苦」劉若英看到這樣的文字，深受感動，雖然是以前幾乎沒遇過的語法，她發揮了擅長的知性口語，溫暖又誠懇地娓娓道來，將「那些年」、「缺口」、「親愛的路人」作曲者木村充利的旋律唱得字字入心，一本書寫成一首歌，而劉若英把一本書，唱成了一首歌。




劉若英facebook.....https://www.facebook.com/Rene0601